I first want to commend you on your boldness, adstar. You're a true Christian, whereas so many others fall by the wayside. They were afraid of this post, they knew not what to say. And you stepped up with an calm intrepidty thus unseen. Bravo!
...now...
16, I did not ask about, in particular. It was actually 6-16. 16 being included because it tells you to "beat a dead horse"...rather redundant is it not?
In your thinking i guess so. I don't particularly understand why God wanted them to do it.( destroy property) I guess it was a demonstration that false teachings where so wrong that they made the possessions of those who taught them unclean also. We see time and time again in the gospels the Jews tearing the cloths of their own backs when they heard something that they thought was blasphemy said in their presence. it was like that very sound waves of what they thought was blasphemy made their own cloths dirty.
Despite, my question of the passages in general, was answered almost satisfactorily. I wanted to know what you THINK about it, how you interpret it.
The price of sin is death. One who teaches false teachings in relation to thing God is worthy of being put to death. God required the Jews to carry out the death penalty for him. I feel that this was because he wanted them to be reminded of the price of sin and wanted the world to know the seriousness of the sin. The price of death for this sin still stands. People who seek to entice Christians to go and worship other gods are still under a death sentance. what has changed is that God no longer requires us to carry out that death penalty.
So the process of the law has changed. Not the death penalty that is the outcome of seeking to entice followers of God to worship other gods.
It is clearly a "violent" thing to spill the blood of your children, wife (wives) or friends AT LEAST by today's standards. I don't believe it was something Jesus particularly preach to do either.
Your right there. Jesus taught us to be messengers of Gods Grace/forgiveness and until Jesus comes again that’s what true Christians will be doing. Loving, forgiving and revealing the gift of forgiveness Jesus proclaimed. But the time when humanity can accept grace will not last forever because God while being longsuffering to the current state of mankind will not allow this state to exist into eternity. God has His plan and His time line.
It would surely be considered "murder" in American court (I would hope anyway) and should surely be lumped in with a violation of the ten commandments.
No murder is unjustifiable/unlawful killing. When God gives commandment to kill then it is not murder but the carrying out of an execution order given by God. The Jews that followed Gods instructions on these matters rightly where never guilty of murder.
In fact, there is no commandment that says "You can directly disobey any or all of the other commandments in the name of God" So really it shouldn't be warranted...unless you believe the rest of the bible supercedes the commandments, rendering them null and void on all accounts, as they are the smaller part of the two and anything outside of them that is contradictory but written under the inspiration of God gets first priority?
Lost me here. Confusing to me. If you can please try and break these up into points or try rewording it in might help me understand what you are getting at and allow me to answer you in a considered and informed manner.
Moreover if one wants to separate "Kill" from "Murder" (which is very difficult to do when one INTENDS to kill someone) even then killing one's parents seems to be a dishonorable thing, leaving our beloved 5th commandment, violated.
Intention has no relevance to the law in regard to carrying out the penalty of the law.
For example. Wether an executioner tasked with giving a lethal injection to a condemned prisoner to day does so with enthusiasm or reluctance makes no difference. Their duty is to carry out the judgement of the court. Likewise the Jews who carried out these judgements of God. it is irrelevant of they did so with enthusiasm or reluctance.
So is it your interpretation, adstar, that these things in the selected passage would not be considered "ok" nor pious today?
Once again it has everything to do with what Gods will is for his followers Today. If i where to do what the Jews where told to do in the referenced scriptures then i would be in rebellion against the teachings of Jesus. I would be in the wrong.
But the law remains true and constant:
It was wrong back them to entice followers of God to worship other Gods and the penalty for doing so was death.
And it is wrong today for them to entice followers of God to worship other Gods and the penalty for doing so is still death.
The only change is the carrying out of the Law. in the past it was physical death carried out by men under the authority of God. Today however God himself carries out the punishment of the law when he deems it proper. After He has given them wrongdoers a life time to repent of their acts and accept the atonement of the Messiah Jesus for the forgiveness of those sins.
Or should it be recognized and encouraged by the Big Boys at the Vatican?
What have i to do with the "Big Boys at the Vatican?" They have their traditions, I have Jesus.
What is the MOST important aspect of Salvation and being with the Lord:
Listening to God when when instructions are given or follolwing the Word of God selectively?
Believing and trusting in the atonement that Jesus has provided all whom will believe and trust in it.
And it is not a selective thing at all. It is following the will of God and travelling with Him in faith acting according to his will as His eternal plan unfolds and is revealed.
Because if the bible IS the word of God rather than WAS the word of God, you're doing a terrible job at being a Christian if you're not out desolating villiages, universities, and churches.
Once again Jesus did not change the law regarding the wrongness of enticing followers of God to follow other gods.
I attest that it is still wrong for people to entice followers of God to follow other gods and that the lawful penalty for doing this is still Death.
I as a Christian am following Gods instructions in regard to the change in the way this death penalty is and when this death penalty is carried out.
The Law has not changed, merely the process ( the way the law is carried out) has changed.
All Praise The Ancient Of Days