I found this site http://mtbest.net, this is a good example of good ideas to follow.
They are advance because majority of the people cannot understand their claimWhat makes you think those people are "advanced"?
They deserve ridicule. They cannot prove one single claim they make.
Much like yourself and this idiotic book.
Wrong, their claims are understood. And their claims cannot be substantiated.They are advance because majority of the people cannot understand their claim
WHY do you restrict yourself to your own rules? our latest post are about ideas.Good ideas for whom?
And what does that have to do with the topic?
Because we have a topic to discuss (after a fashion). If you want to talk about something else start a new thread.WHY do you restrict yourself to your own rules?
No, they were about you holding incorrect ideas as espoused in that ridiculous book.our latest post are about ideas.
Because we have a topic to discuss (after a fashion). If you want to talk about something else start a new thread.
I'm still trying to get a rational response from you on your original "claims".
No, they were about you holding incorrect ideas as espoused in that ridiculous book.
Holidays in Australia aren't relevant.
And now you're having to resort to fantasy yourself.You are not conscious enough to comprehend thats why the book is so ridiculous for you. Your reality is distorted.
No.Have you tried meditation?
My mind is as relaxed as it needs to be, and you're the one that needs to get get in touch with reality. It would make a change from the nonsense you currently subscribe to. Who knows? You may even learn something.it will help you relax your mind and get in touch with reality.
Why are you so sure that the book is invalid?And now you're having to resort to fantasy yourself.
No.
My mind is as relaxed as it needs to be, and you're the one that needs to get get in touch with reality. It would make a change from the nonsense you currently subscribe to. Who knows? You may even learn something.
And I note that you still can't come up with any reasoning as to why you think the book is valid...
As I have previously said: it's a fantasy. It has nothing whatsoever to support its claims and goes directly against known facts.Why are you so sure that the book is invalid?
What are these information?And since I have had the good grace to answer your question (albeit with information I have already given you) would you now answer what I have been asking you for many pages?
As I said before, the book is valid because I understand it is valid. Its in the mind, the explanation is beyond words. I feed my mind with many information and ideas. The book is just an information. And I just know which is valid and not validWhy are you so sure it is valid?
What?What are these information?
In other words you don't even have the decency to answer my questions. You believe because you want to believe. And you rely on ignorance to "support" that belief.As I said before, the book is valid because I understand it is valid. Its in the mind, the explanation is beyond words.
Obviously not, since the book is not "information".I feed my mind with many information and ideas.
False.The book is just an information.
Apparently you don't, you just think you do.And I just know which is valid and not valid
why false?Obviously not, since the book is not "information".
False.
The book is NOT information. To say it is is false.why false?
Yes it is.The book is NOT information. To say it is is false.
Message?Information in its most restricted technical sense is an ordered sequence of symbols that record or transmit a message.
Instruction? Knowledge? Meaning?Moreover, the concept of information is closely related to notions of constraint, communication, control, data, form, instruction, knowledge, meaning, mental stimulus, pattern, perception, representation, and especially entropy.
What you need is an education.what you need is the right information
Carlos Castaneda was a Peruvian-born American author who graduated from the University of California with a PhD in Anthropology. Starting with The Teachings of Don Juan in 1968, he wrote a series of books that described his training and awareness expanding experiences, sometimes inaccurately described as traditional Mesoamerican shamanism. Initially his books were considered works of anthropology, but five years after the first book was published, critics such as Joyce Carol Oates began to consider them fiction.
While today his publisher Simon & Schuster still publishes his popular books as non-fiction, Oates called his writings into question, concluding that his books were fiction. She cited inconsistencies and contradictions, discrepancies between the books and anthropological data, alternate sources for Castaneda's detailed knowledge of shamanic practices, and the lack of corroborating evidence. Critics of the works believe that there is little evidence to suggest that Castaneda's books were the result of actual field work as he claimed.
Castaneda was very protective of his privacy and until recently little was known about him outside what was learned from his twelve books. He rarely spoke in public except toward the end of his life, and gave very few interviews.
I've read couple of chapters, but it's all the same: the story of his "visit" - not one single thing to link it to reality or explain why we're supposed to accept it. If it weren't published as "fact" then it would largely indistinguishable from, say Michael Moorcock's Warrior of Mars (but not as well-written). I.e. supposedly a narrative of an actual visit to an alien planet and what he did there.I am certainly not going to read this book
Er, if time has stopped how are they conversing? Why, and how, is anything happening?‘At this instant, time has stopped for you, and you could remain here twenty or fifty of your Earthly years and then return as if you hadn’t left. Your physical body would remain absolutely unchanged.’
Hmm, or maybe T. Lobsang Rampa.What I did see reminded me a great deal of Carlos Castaneda and books from the late 60's. You are probably familiar with him, but here is the Wiki.
So is that what this junk is? Some sort of "reincarnation" of Castaneda?
Hmm, or maybe T. Lobsang Rampa.
Yeah, this sounds somewhat familiar as well.This section has collected extensive extracts from the spiritual wisdom from the INITIATED Tibetan LOBSANG RAMPA - who wrote many books on the ancient wisdom - nearly half a century ago. This, after he had entered the spiritual and seen the ignorant western world in a manner that was not understood by the average reader, when the books were published. He was the first who in a logical way, described the WALK-IN process - where higher developed beings have the ability to take over a body of a person who voluntary wants to leave this world...
I read all sorts of stuff when I was a teenager, trying to figure out what makes "sense".I haven't read any Castenada, it's hard enough to get my local library to get me Borges' books!
Emphasis mine...The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui Way of Knowledge was published by the University of California Press in 1968 as a work of anthropology. It was written by Carlos Castaneda and submitted as his master’s thesis in the school of anthropology. It reportedly documents the events that took place during an apprenticeship he claimed to have served with a self-proclaimed Yaqui Indian Sorcerer, don Juan Matus, between 1960 and 1965. The authenticity of the book, along with the rest of Castaneda’s series, has been a topic of debate since they were published.
The book is divided into two sections. The first section, The Teachings, is a first person narrative that documents Castaneda's initial interactions with don Juan. The second, A Structural Analysis, is an attempt, Castaneda says, at “disclos[ing] the internal cohesion and the cogency of don Juan’s Teachings.”