dalahar said:Why should the universe take up all the space?
sounds like the totality of all that exists.dalahar said:the whole body of things and phenomena observed or postulated
is this wher you get the "closed" from?a distinct field or province of thought or reality that forms a closed system or self-inclusive and independentorganization
[/edit]dalahar said:whole
(2): milky way galaxy (3): an aggregate ofstars comparable to the Milky Way galaxy
is the universe expanding or is that a postualte from the evidence we have?dalahar said:If the universe is expanding, then what is it expanding into?
this "something else" it must have principles, properties and elements, it must have charecteristics , it is some sort of environment, it it not?Something else that takes up space. Is that not right?
if it is expanding it is expanding within itself, so you could call the nothing "the unvierse". jewish philosophy has a model called "ain soph" meaning "the limitless" this would be what you undesrtand as nothing, this nothing is then impregnated with "ain soph aur" meaning "the limitless light" this would be what you understand as matter, particles, waves, heat, light.If it is wrong, then what do you call the nothing that it is expanding into?
ellion said:this is the same problem as "who created the creator?"
actually my motorbike will get me about as far as anglsey then i will probably have to get a boat after that. how far is the edge of your universe from mine?What if you got to the edge of the universe and could go no further in the flesh but could only continue if you were in the spirit?
how do you know that?I know you don't believe in the spirit,
science is the art of creating problems for an infinity of solutions.but isn't it unscientific to discard the idea of a spirit or heaven because you don't yet have proof?
any more labels to rid your self of, break free of another box, etcI must not be a scientist.
do you feel gods love for you?I heart God,
then you was not really in the spirit, as i have never spoke such words in maybe 6-7 years.I was in the spirit and I overheard you tell your cousin.
to me that sounds like a box of god. just open that box and have a taste of gods love, and when the box is closed god goes back to heaven.Everytime I think about the life and death of Christ.
The point of it is that the definition of Universe is all that exists.TruthSeeker said:How do we know if there's nothing outside our universe? That sounds very much like an assumption...
Ok. That is a different definition from which we are used to. Ever heard of Big Bang?one_raven said:The point of it is that the definition of Universe is all that exists.
There is no "our Universe" and "other Universes".
If it exists at all, anywhere, whether it is in our neighborhood of space or not, it is part of "The Universe".
By saying it exists, you are saying it is part of the Universe, since the Universe is all that exists.
To say something exists outside of the Universe (outside of all that exists) you are saying that it does not exist.
The Universe is not a "place" it is all.
No it doesn't.TruthSeeker said:I hear you, and I agree it is a good definition. However, that begs the question: how big is the universe?
Oh, so we don't live in a place!?one_raven said:No it doesn't.
Because if the universe is not a place, it does not have a size.
Such a definition is convinient and unable to define anything.one_raven said:The difference is that the article treats the Universe as "all that exists" you are thinking of the Universe as a place in space, or even all of space.
The Universe, according to how the writer is defining it, is all of space, all that is IN space, anything that exists (if anything does) outside the boudaries or space... Everything.
TruthSeeker said:Such a definition is convinient and unable to define anything.