The Universe has no beginning, and No End.

Pincho Paxton said:
It's just a word description. Lots of words are not physical. The car doesn't know it is quicker, it's a human concept. Maybe I should change the words to something that really happens... the car travels a shorter distance, and the Aether catches up with it when it stops.
Click to expand...
The word quicker means that something moves further in a given time than something else, or takes less time to cover a fixed distance than something else.
Both descriptions involve time.

It's okay to say you'll change the word but you're gonna find it bloody hard to get any meaning without time in there somewhere.

If there's no time then everything must move at the same rate, there can be no relative movement.
 
*************
M*W: The universe is in a constant state of change (expansion or contraction), even though we don't actually perceive the changes until after a period of time in which they can be recorded. I think the universe will still be around long after we're gone. Perhaps there will be a new life form (evolved from us, or maybe something entirely unique). And, what would it matter anyway, if we're not here?
 
Dywyddyr said:
The word quicker means that something moves further in a given time than something else, or takes less time to cover a fixed distance than something else.
Both descriptions involve time.

It's okay to say you'll change the word but you're gonna find it bloody hard to get any meaning without time in there somewhere.

If there's no time then everything must move at the same rate, there can be no relative movement.
Click to expand...

I don't think it helps however to include imaginary concepts in science. What really needs to happen is that a study needs to be made of what happens to oblate Aether and electrons. If a photon uses the Aether Membrane then the membrane is a fast material, Oblate Aether moves the electron nearer to the membrane, and I am wondering what that would do. I can't really stick with the shortening of distance in front of the car, only to the aether that are part of the car, otherwise you would actually see the stuff in front of the car shrinking, which is silly. So only the aether that are part of the moving object can squash. If it just makes the electrons spin faster then I can't make sense of it. Relativity has to go, but how do I get rid of it?
 
Last edited:
Medicine*Woman said:
*************
M*W: The universe is in a constant state of change (expansion or contraction), even though we don't actually perceive the changes until after a period of time in which they can be recorded. I think the universe will still be around long after we're gone. Perhaps there will be a new life form (evolved from us, or maybe something entirely unique). And, what would it matter anyway, if we're not here?
Click to expand...

We will probably create our own evolution. It wouldn't surprise me if it starts off as Bionic parts, and then moves forward to a complete new body, but keep the brain. Or DNA reconstruction.
 
Pincho Paxton said:
I don't think it helps however to include imaginary concepts in science.
Click to expand...
Yeah, unforyunately your grasp of science isn't all it could be.
And if you're referring to time as imaginary that's yet to be shown as such by you.

What really needs to happen is that a study needs to be made of what happens to oblate Aether and electrons.
Click to expand...
Get on with it then, because a real scientist wouldn't waste his time with a nonsense concept.

I can't really stick with the shortening of distance in front of the car, only to the aether that are part of the car, otherwise you would actually see the stuff in front of the car shrinking, which is silly.
Click to expand...
Also unfortunately no matter how silly you think it is it happens.

Relativity has to go, but how do I get rid of it?
Click to expand...
You can't.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Yeah, unforyunately your grasp of science isn't all it could be.
And if you're referring to time as imaginary that's yet to be shown as such by you.


Get on with it then, because a real scientist wouldn't waste his time with a nonsense concept.


Also unfortunately no matter how silly you think it is it happens.


You can't.
Click to expand...

Relativity has many problems...

1/ It includes Time which is an imaginary concept.
2/ It includes infinite timelines for each object.. which..
A/ Includes infinity which doesn't exist..
B/ Requires infinite energy as well.

So to keep Relativity it would need to be re-written so that it makes sense, but that might confuse people who use an old dictionary. So it has to get a new name. New Relativity Theory... which is...

Oblation of Aether due to speed, and mass.

Yes it uses the word speed.
 
Pincho Paxton said:
Relativity has many problems...
1/ It includes Time which is an imaginary concept.
Click to expand...
Only in your warped opinion.

2/ It includes infinite timelines for each object.. which..
Click to expand...
Huh?

A/ Includes infinity which doesn't exist..
Click to expand...
Huh?

B/ Requires infinite energy as well.
Click to expand...
What?

I get it. You want to get rid of relativity because you haven't got a clue about it.

So to keep Relativity it would need to be re-written so that it makes sense
Click to expand...
But it does make sense. And it's been shown many times that it works. As predicted.

Oblation of Aether due to speed, and mass.
Yes it uses the word speed.
Click to expand...
There is no aether and speed requires time, which you've claimed doesn't exist.
You can't even manage to be a self-consistent crackpot.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Only in your warped opinion.


Huh?


Huh?


What?

I get it. You want to get rid of relativity because you haven't got a clue about it.


But it does make sense. And it's been shown many times that it works. As predicted.


There is no aether and speed requires time, which you've claimed doesn't exist.
You can't even manage to be a self-consistent crackpot.
Click to expand...

Speed doesn't require time, speed requires physics, and all of those Huh? are that you don't even understand the old version of relativity.
 
Pincho Paxton said:
Speed doesn't require time, speed requires physics, and all of those Huh? are that you don't even understand the old version of relativity.
Click to expand...
Speed requires time, since the definition of speed is distance moved per unit time.
And the "huh"s aren't MY misunderstanding at all, simply surprise that you've misunderstood it so much.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Speed requires time, since the definition of speed is distance moved per unit time.
And the "huh"s aren't MY misunderstanding at all, simply surprise that you've misunderstood it so much.
Click to expand...

No that is a translation of speed into English

Speed is

Fast = ...
Slow = ...........

And your Huh's are you forgetting to examine your knowledge, and where it came from. Does relativity not say that two clocks can show different times due to speed. And time is an entire Universal photograph, and that photograph includes all of the matter in the universe, and that photo would be relative to each person, so that is 6 Billion photographs per millisecond all different. Infinite Universes per millisecond if you include all of the relative matter.
 
Last edited:
draqon said:
I think you forgot about history and you are following a childish play here.
Science dose not prove that Earth is round, its definetely flat, heretic!
Science dose not prove string theory, it just assumes it for the best of it.

Or you not a child? speak!
Click to expand...

Huh.................!. Look how huge is the world.....and you think it has no beginning ?. Life follows certain rules that imply a designer or designers and therefore a beginning too .
 
Dywyddyr said:
Nope.
That's "short" and "long".


Not really.
Click to expand...

So now English is your version of nature. Everything has to be an English word. Speed = Distance and time, because science only knows those words. It doesn't know the shortening of distances? Well that just keeps you from moving forwards then. You move like this Speed = Distance, and time, and I move through oblate Aether. That's why I'm faster.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Nope.
That's "short" and "long".


Not really.
Click to expand...

Not really ?.
Coincidence does not create a man and create a woman for him to enjoy and multiple. Coincidence does not create for him food, water.....etc.
Things are in a perfect rhythm that implies a certain designer or certain designers .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top