In the news today... Trump asking if he can use executive power to pardon himself!
It's been a weird cycle on this point. Meanwhile,
Rachel Maddow↱ describes what might be the week's
strangest strangeness.
The setup is a
Bloomberg↱ piece about the Mueller investigation turning to Donald Trump's business dealings; there are a couple paragraphs, though, inviting a double-take:
John Dowd, one of Trump’s lawyers, said on Thursday that he was unaware of the inquiry into Trump’s businesses by the two-months-old investigation and considered it beyond the scope of what Special Counsel Robert Mueller should be examining.
“Those transactions are in my view well beyond the mandate of the Special counsel; are unrelated to the election of 2016 or any alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia and most importantly, are well beyond any Statute of Limitation imposed by the United States Code,” he wrote in an email.
That is to say:
Wait, wait, wait. Statute of Limitation? For what?
The hook comes after Maddow's staff apparently hounded Dowd on this point, such that he eventually responded. According to Maddow:
The President's lawyer brought up the prospect that the President's business activities are crimes, and they're beyond the statute of limitations. He brought that up, apparently unprompted, which is unusual. So, it wasn't a blind quote; it had a name attached to it, so we contacted John Dowd, today. We contacted the President's lawyer today, actually tonight, to see what that meant; to see whether there was something in particular about the President's past business transactions that made him look up the statute of limitations for certain crimes. And Mr. Dowd took our call, and he told us, quote, "We have no evidence that any of these entities"—meaning Trump business entities—"We have no evidence that any of these entities are under investigation." He then told us, quote, "I'm beginning to think it's not true. I'm beginning to wonder where the hell it came from." He then told our producer that he would never speak to him again. Quoting, he told our producer, quote, "this is the last call we'll ever have". I'm beginning to think it's not true, I'm beginning to wonder where the hell it came from, this is the last call we'll ever have.
It's interesting because her A-block setup was predicated in part on the premise that Donald Trump and his administration are panicking—"Like, break glass in case of emergency? They were smashing the glass, last night." And Dowd is an attorney
par excellence, except he's also the guy you go to when you're in freakin' trouble. Not, like, Jacques Verges, defending the worst among humanity because somebody must, but one of John Dowd's clients ended up with the longest sentence in U.S. history for insider trading. That was the day he answered a reporter, "Get the fuck out of here! That's what I've got for CNBC."
Which, in turn, is in stark contrast to the early reports intended to play the whole issue like President Trump asking questions because he's not smart enough to know the answers already.
It is, presently, really easy to get caught up in glimmers of hope; at the same time, there really are signals that people are starting to panic.
Then again, msnbc has spent most of the week panicking, so ... yeah, y'know?
____________________
Notes:
Farrell, Greg and Christian Berthelsen. "Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions". Bloomberg Politics. 20 July 2017. Bloomberg.com. 22 July 2017. https://bloom.bg/2ul7ToF
Maddow, Rachel. "WaPo: Intel intercepts show Sessions, Kislyak talked Trump Russia". The Rachel Maddow Show. 21 July 2017. msnbc.com. 22 July 2017. http://on.msnbc.com/2toGqRH