Except that isn't true. First, Trump hasn't presented a budget. He has presented a budget outline. There is a difference. Just because you like and support the Trumper, it doesn't magically transform his budget outline into a budget. And contrary to your assertion, Obama submitted several budgets during his term in office. Just because the Republican controlled congress failed to pass those budgets, it doesn't follow that Obama didn't submit budgets.
No, Republicans would let the budget lapse. I suggest that instead of using the Constitution as a political prop you should actually spend some time reading the document. It's not the president's job to pass budgets. In the US Constitution, that duty is explicitly delegated to the Congress which was mostly controlled by Republicans during Obama's presidency and which mostly used the budget process as a political prop. Republicans not only threatened to shut down the government, they did shut down the government when they refused to pass a budget. Republicans did on multiple occasions threaten to cause a debt default by refusing to raise the debt ceiling. Republicans on multiple occasions threatened the full faith and credit of the United States government in an attempt to advance their political goals. That's no less than despicable if not treasonous.
Do you have any evidence Obama was golfing and throwing concerts at the White House during budget deals? And why would that be a problem? You do realize that every president for several decades now has played golf while in office and has had "concerts" in the White House? Your man The Donald flies down to Florida every weekend for a round of golf and to be entertained. So for some reason it was wrong for Obama to play golf and be entertained, but it's okay for Trump to play golf and be entertained? Don't you feel a little hypocritical?
So you think meals for the elderly is a Democratic slush fund? Trump's budget would cut more than just funding for the arts. And where is your evidence that staffing at PBS is higher than in private industry counterparts, and why is that important? Additionally, you are wrong to compare PBS (i.e. Corporation for Public Broadcasting) to commercial broadcasters. PBS is collection of many independent TV and radio stations from across the country. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting receives grants from the federal government and uses that money to fund independent broadcasting stations across the country.
The truth isn't a liberal slush fund comrade.
Truth and reason aren't liberal conspiracies comrade.
Women's health isn't a liberal conspiracy or slush fund either. Tax payer funding of abortion has long been illegal in the United States. Planned Parenthood doesn't use government money to provide abortions. So if that's all the Trumper wanted from Planned Parenthood, there is no reason to not fund Planned Parenthood. The fact is by denying funding for Planned Parenthood, Trump will deny healthcare for women.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Amendment
And where is your evidence that the EPA is a Democratic slush fund? And what does the EPA have to do with unions? I think you are confused. I think you are confusing the Department of Labor with the EPA. The Department of Labor deals with unions, the EPA does not. The fact is there is no indication the EPA has anything to do with unions, much less Democratic slush funds.
So you don't think the Koch brothers, two of the richest men in the world, aren't Republicans? I'm sure that would be news to them and they many right wing institutions they have created and funded to advance Republican causes. The fact is the Koch's and their wealthy cohorts are without precedent on the left.
And you don't think Republicans "buy" votes? The Kochs alone spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year to "buy" votes. That's why the Kochs and their cohorts do it. They spend all that money every year to buy influence, and they have been quite successful at it. The Kochs and their ilk get a lot of benefit from their "vote buying". That's why they do it. That's why the Kochs pay no state income taxes in the state where they are headquartered. And Republicans are responsible for the Citizens United decision which allowed the unlimited secret funding of campaigns, and Citizens United mostly benefits Republicans.
Drinking clean water, and breathing clear air, and living in contaminant free homes aren't liberal conspiracies conspiracies comrade.
