The problem the Dems now face is that the more Trump abuses this woman, and he will abuse her, the more they will support him...IMO
The key is to activate the Dem. voters that would normally not be bothered to vote. IMO
The problem the Dems now face is that the more Trump abuses this woman, and he will abuse her, the more they will support him...IMO
Of course you do. You don't mind that she defended the death penalty, tried to block evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row, kept people in prison longer for cheap labor, put over 1,500 in jail for marijuana violations, etc.. https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/01/politics/tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris-debate/index.htmlI like Kamala Harris!
And of course, like all excuse making red necks, let's not forget the fucking womanising and worse actions, approaching into criminality, of the moron that at this times sits in the White House.Not to mention the nepotism she received from her dating a 60 year old married man when she was 29.
Then again, you like Trump and he's the "grab-em-by-the-pussy" guy who is trying to suppress the vote in the upcoming election. Horses for courses, it seems.Of course you do. You don't mind that she defended the death penalty, tried to block evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row, kept people in prison longer for cheap labor, put over 1,500 in jail for marijuana violations, etc.. https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/01/politics/tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris-debate/index.html
Not to mention the nepotism she received from her dating a 60 year old married man when she was 29.
Of course you do. You don't mind that she defended the death penalty, tried to block evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row, kept people in prison longer for cheap labor, put over 1,500 in jail for marijuana violations, etc.. https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/01/politics/tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris-debate/index.html
Not to mention the nepotism she received from her dating a 60 year old married man when she was 29.
I've already refuted your "suppress the vote' lie.Then again, you like Trump and he's the "grab-em-by-the-pussy" guy who is trying to suppress the vote in the upcoming election. Horses for courses, it seems.
I must have missed that.I've already refuted your "suppress the vote' lie.
I understand that having a President who has a proclivity to sexually assaulting women is not setting up a good role model in the most powerful position in the land. What did your daddy teach you about that?And if you don't understand about the facts of life with women and rich men...well, I ain't your daddy.
I guess a short convo with Jeffery Epstein would be in order yes? Oh that's right, wasn't he found dead in his prison cell...??And if you don't understand about the facts of life with women and rich men...well, I ain't your daddy.
Must have.I must have missed that.
See, that's the discussion your daddy should have had with you. Maybe your mommy should have taught you not to hold politicians up as role models too. Man, your formative education was sorely lacking.I understand that having a President who has a proclivity to sexually assaulting women is not setting up a good role model in the most powerful position in the land. What did your daddy teach you about that?
Attributing to corruption what is fairly straight forward evolutionary psychology is pretty ignorant.I guess a short convo with Jeffery Epstein would be in order yes? Oh that's right, wasn't he found dead in his prison cell...??
It just shows you how deep the corruption runs hey?
It's not just that, of course. The man's attitudes to women, based on his record of behaviour, must inevitably influence his decision making and policy formulation when it comes to dealing with and for women.See, that's the discussion your daddy should have had with you. Maybe your mommy should have taught you not to hold politicians up as role models too. Man, your formative education was sorely lacking.
Yes, a rich man's attitude toward women who literally throw themselves at rich guys, but not reportedly experienced by former female staffers or having anywhere near as much actual evidence as Joe Biden's sexually harassing creepiness toward women and young girls. And according to Kamala Harris apologists, Trump never cheated, as he and his wives were already "estranged". Apparently, that makes it all okay. And don't worry, no one really likes Rosie O'Donnell.It's not just that, of course. The man's attitudes to women, based on his record of behaviour, must inevitably influence his decision making and policy formulation when it comes to dealing with and for women.
Hope springs eternal. Oddly, even for foreigners who have shouldn't have any personal steak in it.This is just one more personal attribute that confirms that Trump is a really bad pick for President. But it's okay. He'll be voted out in a couple of months, assuming a fair vote takes place.
You have no clue what you're on about, aside from your squarely outside view, informed by leftist sources.One other point I'd add is that it might well be fine for you to ignore Trump's character, being the rugged individualist you are, but there are lots of people out there who do regard him as a role model of sorts. Overall, having him as your President degrades your society. America used to be the light on the hill, a model for other nations. These days, not so much.
Not as ignorant as overlooking the evolutionary psychology behind political corruption.Attributing to corruption what is fairly straight forward evolutionary psychology is pretty ignorant.
which is a pity - there's some good humor potential in there, puns and all, if one could assume intent.Hope springs eternal. Oddly, even for foreigners who have shouldn't have any personal steak in it.
But yeah, sure, Trump's going to be creamed by the dead guy and his far left, Trojan hores presidential candidate running mate.
I understand. The pussy grabbing was obviously their fault, not his. Will you make the same excuse on behalf of Epstein and Maxwell, or do you make a special plea for Trump because he's your political man?Yes, a rich man's attitude toward women who literally throw themselves at rich guys...
It's not that odd. Like I said, America used to be the light on the hill. A lot of people would like to see it return to some semblance of its former, respectable self. Step 1 is obvious. It's not only that, either. Your people are dying in far greater numbers than they should be.Hope springs eternal. Oddly, even for foreigners who have shouldn't have any personal steak in it.
How strange. I give you the view from squarely outside, as you put it, and you - squarely inside - tell me that I'm less qualified than you to provide that view.You have no clue what you're on about, aside from your squarely outside view, informed by leftist sources.
Your people are dying in far greater numbers than they should be.
Wow. So you live in a naive little world where men are from Mars and women from Venus, without any hope that a man can understand and respond to what a woman actually wants. It's not anyone's fault. It's mutual understanding. Some women will do just about anything for a rich man. That's a fact of life. But God forfend any man understand that and act on it, huh? And you're so out of touch that a man simply understanding women must be a rapist.I understand. The pussy grabbing was obviously their fault, not his. Will you make the same excuse on behalf of Epstein and Maxwell, or do you make a special plea for Trump because he's your political man?
Too bad Australia and other countries need America to be the light on the hill.It's not that odd. Like I said, America used to be the light on the hill. A lot of people would like to see it return to some semblance of its former, respectable self. Step 1 is obvious. It's not only that, either. Your people are dying in far greater numbers than they should be.
Yes, outsider views are very often inaccurate. It's not a mystery.How strange. I give you the view from squarely outside, as you put it, and you - squarely inside - tell me that I'm less qualified than you to provide that view.
You mention sources. Is it that you think I have the wrong view because I haven't been seen enoughpropagandareliable information from your trusted conservative sources? Blame the ubiquitous liberal media again?
You have it wrong again...Firstly it's not America, but the USA, but a mistake that would be common among your brigade.Too bad Australia and other countries need America to be the light on the hill.
Just as your red neck views are totally inaccurate with regards to Australia.Yes, outsider views are very often inaccurate. It's not a mystery.
That you would indiscriminately call what you deem conservative sources propaganda pretty much says it all.
I'm out of touch because I don't think sexual assault - of men or women or children - is right? What's wrong with you?Wow. So you live in a naive little world where men are from Mars and women from Venus, without any hope that a man can understand and respond to what a woman actually wants. It's not anyone's fault. It's mutual understanding. Some women will do just about anything for a rich man. That's a fact of life. But God forfend any man understand that and act on it, huh? And you're so out of touch that a man simply und1erstanding women must be a rapist.
Look, I know eggheads are generally lacking in social skills, but at least an intellectual understanding that they do exist should be possible.
And you say leftists have no sense of humour.That you would indiscriminately call what you deem conservative sources propaganda pretty much says it all.