A little told story in the Vietnam war is how most of the guerrillas hiding underground for long periods- frustrating as they were for American troops to deal with- ended up dying or debilitated from horrible diseases and malnutrition. Only the kind of life you'd want to live if you believed the alternative was certain death. As it's shown in Afghanistan and elsewhere, the US has plenty of tools in its bag to make sure that whatever goes into the caves never comes back out.
The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End
- Thread starter ExposingAmericanLies
- Start date
A little told story in the Vietnam war is how most of the guerrillas hiding underground for long periods- frustrating as they were for American troops to deal with- ended up dying or debilitated from horrible diseases and malnutrition. Only the kind of life you'd want to live if you believed the alternative was certain death. As it's shown in Afghanistan and elsewhere, the US has plenty of tools in its bag to make sure that whatever goes into the caves never comes back out.
That analogy would only be valid if the Taliban were occupying downtown Houston. Kind of a different matter when you're trying to weed thousands of them out from hundreds of millions who themselves aren't really so friendly towards the West in the first place. Anyhow, you'll be humiliated enough if the US does indeed strike, no need to go over the details in advance before anything actually happens.
The details are as following:
التفاصيل من السفن الأمريكية وقواعدها التي سيتم استخدامها في الحرب ضد سوريا وشعب سوريا
translation: Details of American and their allies ships and their bases that will be used in war against Syria and people of Syria
NATO:
1) Air-base in Indzhirlik, Turkey
France:
1) Fregate Chevalier Paul with missile launchers
2) Air-Base in Al Dahra, UAE
Britain:
1) Helicopter carrier HMS Illustrious
2) Fregate HMS Montrose and HMS Westminster
3) carrier HMS Bulwark
4) submarine Trafalgar with Tomahawk missiles
5) air-Base in Akrotiri, Cyprus.
USA:
1) 60th Operational Group of 6th fleet of USA of 5 destroyers with Tomahawk missiles قاذفات صواريخ
2) Airship carrier USS Nimitz (group of 4 destroyers and a carrier)
3) USS San Antanonio (w/ Harrier II) and USS Kersarge (w/ Harrier II)
4) Airship carrier USS Harry S. Truman
5) Air-Base in Dahran
Don't worry, Iran's flying boats will take them all out.
don't be silly, SA-22 and SA-17 will take em out.
but, who is on those 5 warships US sending? Majors like Nidal Malik Hasan in charge of Lewis McChords?
So a 30 year plus old Soviet surface to air weapons systems is going to take them out?
I think I already asked you in another thread to start constructing such things yourself. I can see that's not going to happen. In your defense, I guess it's probably hard to look things up with one hand desperately seeking Obama's wood all the time. To wit:
joepiostole said:
Yes, taking time off in the middle of an acute crisis is certainly a good play.
I know you are right and the people of these states are the ones suffering from our interference in their politics. Oppression is never the answer and so do we just sit back and watch as civil war erupts in Syria and accept that it may well end up being an Islamist state? As things look now the choices are Assad or an Islamist state and either will be decided by a civil war. There is only one certainty in my mind and that is Assad must go. What Syria becomes after Assad may well look like Iran.:shrug:
'nuff said. yep.
That's right. In 30 years the US still has yet to figure out effective defense tactics and technologies to counter Soviet-era sea missiles, and the commanders onboard US warships are all militant Islamic psychopaths. This should be an easy rout, I don't know why those ships ever bothered setting sail in the first place.
Well, even if Syria's air and naval forces aren't truly up to par, America does have plenty of women and children, and Assad's supporters are incredibly good at dealing with those.
[video=youtube;ZnuivgGFKw0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnuivgGFKw0[/video]
So this is how you explain you many errors of fact and reason? Again, I challenge you to make a fact based truthful rational argument.
If the US was in crisis you might have a point. But the US is not in crisis. The US doesn't have 5 naval destroyers off its coast threating to rain havoc down on it...Syria does. If President Obama was in Assad's shoes you would have a point. But he isn't. Syria is in crisis.The United States is not. So your premise is as usual, wrong...one of them minor details again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantsir-S1
30 year old what? It's like calling Ford cars 100 year old because Ford's Model-A car was made in 1903, obviously Ford car now has been modified to an extreme from what it used to be.
And US supporters are incredibly good at using chemical weapons against Syrian people and blaming it on the government, to be used a pawn for intervention into Syria.
Obama should ''fucking care.'' Petty politics, unless it's a repub playing golf. lol
Ah yes, Pantsir-S1, Mig-29, Ivan Drago, they will all bring America to its knees. But none of them will serve Syria nearly as well as the army of prisoners it's training for human shield duty.
About what? He is a pawn in Pentagon's hands, the guy does what others tell him to do. He might as well just read a newspaper and poop and eat all day long.
No, it isn't. It is still a 30+ year old Soviet surface to air missile defense system. That missile system really worked out well for Iraq when the US attacked and invaded Iraq not once but twice, didn’t it? How long did it take US forces to destroy Iraqi forces not once but twice? And you think it is going to work better for Syria?
I would that all Presidents find a way to relieve stress and if golf is it then so be it. You chastised Joepistole for bringing in Party politics and you brought in Petty politics! Sad really sad!