The Sun Is Not Hot

I found the lead for more worthy teachers. You wise guys here must attend these conventions:
[video=youtube_share;t8tqgntbjyE]http://youtu.be/t8tqgntbjyE[/video]

These scientists still have the capacity to question the current paradigms in place.
 
It looks quite interesting, so far as I've got, but why
do you want us to watch nearly 5 hours of video
about something that has nothing to do with the OP?
 
Last edited:
The first 5 minutes is interesting. It was saying that the great pyramid with a ground base of over 14 acres, is square to half an inch.
I've probably got the details a bit wrong, but something like that.
Could that be true? It sounds incredible.
If it is true, I'll watch some more of it.

Added later.
Other people say the same thing.
I'll try to watch another 5 minutes today.
 
Last edited:
Our science and history is only a remembering of the knowledge of previous versions of man before our current model of humanity. We were rebooted already and previous link was intentionally severed.

Cold fusion is a reality that is slowly getting disclosed and it is a less destructive form of energy that can serve as the model for the sun.


Aside from Kaku's theory that suns can be white hole ejecting what they capture from other realms, Plasma Cosmology is another interesting model.

Plasma Physics and electrical universe model can also better explain the sun, the corona discharges and photonic discharges that do not necessarily consume the mass of the sun. The aurora phenomena is an example of plasma formation in space that do not translate to hot temperature.

Here are scientists who are slowly advancing a better understanding of the sun and cosmology:
[video=youtube_share;NH5RKT1DQC4]http://youtu.be/NH5RKT1DQC4[/video]

These scientists could be insiders. The standard model so far advanced by the academe is constantly needing ad hoc explanatory accretions that is better and simpler understood by plasma and electrical universe model.

[video=youtube_share;8hiv9yT7BhA]http://youtu.be/8hiv9yT7BhA[/video]
 
chung said:
The sun is a light generating sphere, but the photons traveling the near vacuum of space are not hot. We only feel the heat from friction of the sun's rays as they pass particles within the space-time curvature around the planet.

It is like the effect certain waves that agitate certain kinds of molecules, just like how microwaves agitate H2O molecules to heat food. But placing a ceramic figurine in the microwave will not make it hot.
Click to expand...

This is wrong on three accounts:
1. The sun is indeed extremely hot. It is some 27 million fahrenheit in it's core, 10,000 degrees fahrenheit on it's surface and about a million degrees in it's atmosphere. The sun is after all a nuclear reaction and nuclear reactions generate huge amounts of heat.

2. Heat does not need a carrier medium because it can travel in the form of electromagnetic radiation called infrared. Also, ultraviolet rays can generated tremendous heat too. The glass part of an incandescent light bulb gets very hot and yet some incandescent light bulbs are full of a vacuum. How does the heat travel from the filament through a vacuum to the glass? I.R. is how.

3. Most of the heating done to the air by sunlight is done after the sunlight heats the ground and the ground radiates the heat outward.
 
[QUOTE="alphareign, post: 3473556,

3. Most of the heating done to the air by sunlight is done after the sunlight heats the ground and the ground radiates the heat outward.[/QUOTE]

Why are you saying that , since some of the heat is absorbed by the ground then the difference is reflected
 
timojin said:
Why are you saying that , since some of the heat is absorbed by the ground then the difference is reflected
Click to expand...
Some is absorbed and then re-radiated at night, some is reflected directly.
All of it came from the sun.
No sun, no warm ground, no re-radiation.
 
chung said:
Our science and history is only a remembering of the knowledge of previous versions of man before our current model of humanity. We were rebooted already and previous link was intentionally severed.

Cold fusion is a reality that is slowly getting disclosed and it is a less destructive form of energy that can serve as the model for the sun.


Aside from Kaku's theory that suns can be white hole ejecting what they capture from other realms, Plasma Cosmology is another interesting model.

Plasma Physics and electrical universe model can also better explain the sun, the corona discharges and photonic discharges that do not necessarily consume the mass of the sun. The aurora phenomena is an example of plasma formation in space that do not translate to hot temperature.

Here are scientists who are slowly advancing a better understanding of the sun and cosmology:
[video=youtube_share;NH5RKT1DQC4]

These scientists could be insiders. The standard model so far advanced by the academe is constantly needing ad hoc explanatory accretions that is better and simpler understood by plasma and electrical universe model.

[video=youtube_share;8hiv9yT7BhA]
Click to expand...

Hmmm....none works

However

Go to youtube , search ; A Plasma Universe ? part 1 , will get you there .
 
Plasma Physics' Answers to the New Cosmological Questions by Dr. Donald E. Scott-Full video.

Doesn't work

However if you go youtube and put in this title you will get there . Buy the way NASA is involved , enjoy .
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
Some is absorbed and then re-radiated at night, some is reflected directly.
All of it came from the sun.
No sun, no warm ground, no re-radiation.
Click to expand...

I guess you don't believe there is heat generation from nuclear decay and a minor heat coming from the core trough volcanoes , but that is ok.
 
timojin said:
I guess you don't believe there is heat generation from nuclear decay and a minor heat coming from the core trough volcanoes , but that is ok.
Click to expand...
Oh for Pete's sake Tim; this is the second time in just a few days you've lost track of your own argument:

alphareign said:
Most of the heating done to the air by sunlight is done after the sunlight heats the ground and the ground radiates the heat outward.
Click to expand...
Direct response, quoting the above:
timojin said:
Why are you saying that , since some of the heat [from that sunlight] is absorbed by the ground then the difference is reflected
Click to expand...
You were referencing specifically the sunlight alphareign mentioned when you directly quoted him.

As was I, by extension, when I directly quoted you:
DaveC426913 said:
Some [of that sunlight] is absorbed and then re-radiated at night, some is reflected directly. All of it came from the sun.
Click to expand...
 
timojin said:
I guess you don't believe there is heat generation from nuclear decay and a minor heat coming from the core trough volcanoes , but that is ok.
Click to expand...
Not really. There is some heat generation from nuclear decay, but it's about 0.03% of the energy coming from the sun. (47 terawatts vs 173,000 terawatts.)
 
chung said:
Cold fusion is a reality that is slowly getting disclosed
Click to expand...
No, it's not. It has never been demonstrated. Every attempt has failed.
Plasma Physics and electrical universe model can also better explain the sun, the corona discharges and photonic discharges that do not necessarily consume the mass of the sun. The aurora phenomena is an example of plasma formation in space that do not translate to hot temperature.
Click to expand...
For plasmas you need either very low pressures (auroras, fluorescent bulbs) or very high temperatures (the Sun.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top