That means I hate knowlegde now.
I can't think of anyone who fits that description. All of the forward thinkers I can think of are constantly publishing, teaching, researching, experimenting and working to contribute, if not to discover for themselves, some esoteric fact about the next leading edge question in science.
(such as rpenner) rpenner is one of the most generous and concise contributors to this board. You have no idea what you are missing by arguing with a person of such insight and ability. Of course it seems twisted to you, because you've decided that the standard for knowledge is arbitrary, and you can just define it as you wish. If anything is absolute in science, it's the minimum standards of knowledge of facts and methods that are universally applied and understood even by beginners. For some reason this fact has left you in this dust. It seems odd to me when people react cynically to the basic stuff they've never bothered to actually study. Do you stand over your plumber or car mechanic and tell him how much torque to apply to a nut, or do you rely on such a person's expertise? Why is engaging science-educated people any different? Why the arbitrary standards and cynicism?
What makes you think there is any better "version" of science than the one we've got? What is so insidious about scientists? Did you have a bad experience in a science class? Did you freak out from watching a horror flick as a kid, one that involved a mad scientist, and you still can't get it out of your mind? Did you get denied a grant, a grade, or graduation, or some other result for which you blame others? Contempt for science makes no sense. You'd just as well discredit mechanics or plumbers, for conspiring to use mainstream wrenches and screwdrivers. Why would anybody do that?