The Qur'an

Then it won't be hard to show where the Chinese moved to in Arab lands from the 700s until the Mongol invasions.
 
Then it won't be hard to show where the Chinese moved to in Arab lands from the 700s until the Mongol invasions.
:bugeye:

What are you talking about?

As if asking how many Chinese were living in New Amsterdam before trade started in the Americas makes any sense? Of course, there were ZERO Chinese in New Amsterdam BEFORE trade started! So What? After trade started they were welcomed and settled there to conduct trade with China.

How many Arabs were living in the Tang capital of Chang'an before sea trading routes were opened with Arabs? Oh, that would be ZERO. But AFTER trade started about 4000 Muslims lived and worked in Chang'an. The Chinese Emperor also provided land within his capitol city and paid for and Chinese Citizen built a Mosque for the Muslims living there.


Wherever Chinese merchants were welcomed they settled and traded.



Again, the obvious answer is staring you in the face. Islam teaches there is One God. It is inherently hostile towards people of different faiths. It teaches only the people of the book are accepted religions. It teaches to tax people if they are not Muslims. It teaches to treat non-Muslims with hostility.

Because of these hateful ideologies non-Muslim have not been welcomed into cities like Mecca in the way Muslims have been welcomed into other peoples cities. It's exactly the same TODAY. This is so obvious you'd have to be completely blind not to see it.
 
Last edited:
Native Americans embraced Christianity.
With swords to their necks and with riffles aimed at their heads from the British and the French invaders. The Christians used and are still using proselytising tactics everywhere they can .
 
Christianity has been used as a means to advance colonization since the Age of Discovery. \
Islam has been used as a means to advance colonization since the Islamic Crusades.

Without doing some serious back-flipping monotheism will never accept that another people's belief system is as valid as its own. Sure the Xians made some concessions for Socrates and Plato etc.. but ONLY because they were before Christ. The same may be true for Buddha (at least for Catholics - although I'm not 100% convinced that's true). More often than not Christians used the idea of bringing the Word of God to the heathens as a way to sanctify their colonization. As did the Muslims.
 
Actually, some Native American religions are very much like Christian monotheism.
Huh.....!!!.
Natives had their own deities and they were very different from Christianity .
The British and the French brought Jesus to the natives with rifles, swords and blood shed .....yikes !!!.
 
The British and the French brought Jesus to the natives with rifles, swords and blood shed .....yikes !!!.

Some rich men came and raped the land,
Nobody caught 'em
Put up a bunch of ugly boxes, and Jesus,
people bought 'em
And they called it paradise
The place to be
They watched the hazy sun, sinking in the sea

You can leave it all behind
and sail to Lahaina
just like the missionaries did, so many years ago
They even brought a neon sign:"Jesus is coming"
Brought the white man's burden down
Brought the white man's reign

Who will provide the grand design?
What is yours and what is mine?
'Cause there is no more new frontier
We have got to make it here
We satifsy our endless needs and
justify our bloody deeds,
in the name of destiny and the name of God

And you can see them there,
On Sunday morning
Stand up and sing about what it's like up there
They call it paradise
I don't know why
You call someplace paradise,
kiss it goodbye

The Last Resort - Eagles
 
Something interesting I was reading on Wiki:
Mecca was never capital of any of the Islamic states but Muslim rulers did contribute to its upkeep. During the reigns of Uthman Ibn Affan (c. 579-656) and Umar (c. 586-590-644 CE) concerns of flooding caused the caliphs to bring in Christian engineers to build barrages in the low-lying quarters and construct dykes and embankments to protect the area round the Kaaba.

How were Muslims able to found and build Baghdad and yet not even be able to keep their Kaaba from flooding a few decades prior? :confused:
Notice again how few cities were founded during the supposed 800 year " long "Islamic" Golden Age.


It's interesting to uncover the propaganda used to magically enhance superstitions or credit them for various mystical Utopias and "Golden Ages" ... too funny :)
 
786 theorized that perhaps Europeans may have been bigoted by Christianity and therefor couldn't (or wouldn't) appreciate the deep insights into humanity expressed by GOD in the Qur'an.

and yet these same Christians had no problem with other Philosophies.

Jesuits were very active in transmitting Chinese knowledge to Europe. Confucius's works were translated into European languages through the agency of Jesuit scholars stationed in China. Matteo Ricci started to report on the thoughts of Confucius, and Father Prospero Intorcetta published the life and works of Confucius into Latin in 1687.[88] It is thought that such works had considerable importance on European thinkers of the period, particularly among the Deists and other philosophical groups of the Enlightenment who were interested by the integration of the system of morality of Confucius into Christianity.


Again, we're left with the more simpler answer being that the Qur'an wasn't really written by a magical sky-God at all and more than likely was an inferior peace of literature. The Qur'an probably wasn't constructed as a means to lead to enlightenment about humanity and so wasn't valued by neither Chinese nor European intellectuals.
 
786 theorized that perhaps Europeans may have been bigoted by Christianity and therefor couldn't (or wouldn't) appreciate the deep insights into humanity expressed by GOD in the Qur'an.

and yet these same Christians had no problem with other Philosophies.

What seems to have skipped you is that Islamic Empire was a direct threat to them, or did you not care to read that, I gave the example of Japanese in America.

Have fun jumping to conclusions :D

Peace be unto ;)
 
The Qur'an probably wasn't constructed as a means to lead to enlightenment about humanity and so wasn't valued by neither Chinese nor European intellectuals.
Islam had a pretty profound effect on China....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_China

And then the low count for Muslims in China is over 20 million.

Not that I am especially a fan of Islam. I haven't managed to read the Koran - or the whole Bible, or Ulysses by James Joyce, or Adam Smith's works, for that matter.)
 
:bugeye:

What are you talking about?

As if asking how many Chinese were living in New Amsterdam before trade started in the Americas makes any sense? Of course, there were ZERO Chinese in New Amsterdam BEFORE trade started! So What? After trade started they were welcomed and settled there to conduct trade with China.

??? Do you think Arabs and Chinese started trading only after Islam? Where did you learn history?

Why do you think the Chinese did not construct temples to pre-Islamic Arab faiths?
 
SAM said:
??? Do you think Arabs and Chinese started trading only after Islam? Where did you learn history?

Why do you think the Chinese did not construct temples to pre-Islamic Arab faiths?
They did, of course - unless you intend to dismiss Zoroastrianism and the like as non-Arab.
wiki said:
Well before the 6th century Zoroastrianism had spread to northern China via the Silk Road, gaining official status in a number of Chinese states. Remains of Zoroastrian temples have been found in Kaifeng and Zhenjiang, and according to some scholars[who?] remained as late as the 1130s, but by the 13th century the religion had faded from prominence in China. However, many scholars[who?] assert the influence of Zoroastrianism (as well as later Manicheism) on elements of Buddhism, especially in terms of light symbolism.

And there is the age old pattern of such religions, usefulness to empire:
Wiki said:
It was during the Mongol-founded Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368), that large numbers of Muslims settled in China. The Mongols, a minority in China, gave Muslim immigrants an elevated status over the native Han Chinese as part of their governing strategy, thus giving Muslims a heavy influence. Hundreds of thousands of Muslims immigrants were recruited and forcibly relocated from Western and Central Asia by the Mongols to help them administer their rapidly expanding empire

Embracing Islam, one way or another, is something despots and tyrants and feudal lords have often found useful - Saudi Arabia a recent small example.
doreen said:
And then the low count for Muslims in China is over 20 million.
The low count for the Chinese is over a billion.

And the discussion was not of the influence of Muslims, or even Islam, but of the Quran directly on Chinese philosophy or intellectual work. It appears to have been little, if any.
 
Zoroastrianism is Arab? I will tell my BIL. He keeps calling me Taliban :D
 
SAM said:
Zoroastrianism is Arab? I will tell my BIL. He keeps calling me Taliban
I don't think your point was about Arabs carefully defined, but about Islam compared with other trader's religions from the Middle East area- at least, the ones that built temples.

But if you want to dodge on the technicality, so be it. The Chinese built temples or churches to basically all the major religions - certainly all the empire-scale ones - that traded in their borders.
 
Last edited:
I don't think your point was about Arabs carefully defined, but about Islam compared with other trader's religions from the Middle East area- at least, the ones that built temples.

But if you want to dodge on the technicality, so be it.

The Arabs were never considered as Zoroastrians. Their pagan religions were always distinct. Zoroastians like Jews are born, not made and have kept themselves ethnically "pure" since the last 2000 years in India [most Judaism is borrowed from Zoroastrianism].

Ever hear of Hatim Ta'i? Ta'i is what the Arabs were before they were Arabs. They were vassals under the Persians, just like the Nestorians.

A two second google search

That there were Arab and Persian merchants domiciled in Chinese ports in the immediately pre-Islamic period is indicated by the words used to refer to them in Chinese annals. Persians were called Po-ssu, Arabs Ta-shih. Po-ssu is obviously an attempt to render the word Pars, which gave rise to the Greek Perses, the Latin Parthia and the Arabic Fars. Ta-shih is derived from the Aramaic name of the Arab tribe of Tayy, which must have reached China via Aramaic-speaking Nestorian merchants from the region of al-Hira, where this tribe was dominant.

http://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/issue/200504/the.seas.of.sindbad.htm
 
SAM said:
The Arabs were never considered as Zoroastrians. Their pagan religions were always distinct
The Chinese built temples for the Zarathustrans and the Muslims, the Buddhists and the Taoists, the Christians and I will bet you the Jews.

They did not build temples for the Mongol shamanism, and other such religions, most likely because there was no temple building involved.

Now, about the blank page where the observations of the Quran's influence on Chinese intellectual endeavor are to be recorded - - - I've read the book in translation, and I can well understand why someone with the Analects or the Tao Te Ching or the I Ching or the many others might find it underwhelming. But there is something, surely?
 
What seems to have skipped you is that Islamic Empire was a direct threat to them, or did you not care to read that, I gave the example of Japanese in America.

Have fun jumping to conclusions :D

Peace be unto ;)
The doesn't explain why European Christians translated Arab Philosophers into Latin. They certainly weren't threatened enough to skip over those treaties. Oh, they read the Qur'an they just didn't think it was as good as Greek, Roman, Indian, Chinese or Arab philosophy.
GOD, for inexplicable reason, wasn't valued as highly as mortals.
 
Back
Top