Vega said:ok, so back to the question!
would you prefer to live in pakistan rather than india?
I prefer to live in India of course.
Its my country.
Vega said:ok, so back to the question!
would you prefer to live in pakistan rather than india?
what's wrong with pakistan?samcdkey said:I prefer to live in India of course.
Its my country.
Vega said:what's wrong with pakistan?
women not allowed to drive cars?
Is that you in the picture sam?samcdkey said:where do you live????? Cars???
You do remember that Pakistan has had a woman Prime Minister?
http://www.cricinfo.com/db/STATS/WOMEN/PAK-WOMEN/
And they have a cricket team too!
Vega said:Is that you in the picture sam?
Thats the colour of the indian cricket team!samcdkey said:I'm no cricketer! Nor am I Pakistani!!
Thats their team colors!
Vega said:Thats the colour of the indian cricket team!
pakistani's are green!
don't pakistani women have little rights compared to secular india?samcdkey said:Oops you're right!
Sorry fasting and low on caffeine!
Here is the Pakistan team!
Vega said:don't pakistani women have little rights compared to secular india?
It does. Mutation isn't the only way to create new genetic material; sexual reproduction allows crossover (half a chromosome from each parent means entirely new genes can be formed at the connecting point). Experiments with genetic algorithms have in fact shown crossover to be more of a driving force for evolution than mutation.Lord Insane said:Good point Roman !!
However the new mutation of the gene only happens in one person - or egg or spermcell or fertilized egg or embryo !!!!!!!!
After that it might be passed on .........
So it doesn´t matter that it takes two to tango ....
That there is a very crucial point! There are areas such as genetics and human biology where it has rasied ethical issues often clashing with the progression of ground breaking research!spidergoat said:The knowledge of evolution is one aspect of the problem with religion. Religious people are less likely to be aware of emerging science, or to simply discount it entirely due to their ideology, and therefore tend to make bad decisions about the course of society.
I think it's all because of sharia law.samcdkey said:Yes and its all because of Zia-ul-Haq.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zia-ul-Haq's_Islamization
But I'm very glad that people are sitting up and taking notice.
About time raised to the nth degree.
http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/07/bbaede32-3722-4bb2-b884-91869daa6224.html
http://www.wwrn.org/article.php?idd=22323&sec=36&con=26
http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=3379
http://www.cii.gov.pk/infoservice/interWS.asp
http://www.geo.tv/zs/capitaltalktranscript_english.asp
http://www.dawn.com/2006/07/27/local2.htm
spidergoat said:The knowledge of evolution is one aspect of the problem with religion. Religious people are less likely to be aware of emerging science, or to simply discount it entirely due to their ideology, and therefore tend to make bad decisions about the course of society.
Vega said:I think it's all because of sharia law.
so what's wrong with sharia law, sam?samcdkey said:You mean the interpretation of it.
Yes, I agree.
Vega said:so what's wrong with sharia law, sam?
too much for you to cope with ?..you said you are religious ..correct???
samcdkey said:What? Don't you know me by now?
What is the problem with Sharia?
That they stopped ijtihad on it many years ago and have not moved forward.
ijtihad=consensus and review from Islamic scholars
Here is the take from an Islamic scholar.
http://ecumene.org/IIS/csss97.htm
BTW, this point is elaborately discussed in one of the links I posted earlier.
If you are not even glancing over them, don't make me waste my time.
Vega said:there you go evading the question again!
Could you pleeeeeease answer the question?
samcdkey said:What is the problem with Sharia?
That they stopped ijtihad on it many years ago and have not moved forward.