Both the democrat backed media and the republican backed media have similar faults. The democrat backed media tends to stick closer to actual fact, since recently republican backed media has found that facts present inconvenient obstacles to their agenda.Why do you think Democrat-backed "media" don't have the same faults? Moral superiority?
billvonThe democrat backed media tends to stick closer to actual fact,
can i hear an amen?Regardless of intent or purpose, a religious test is unconstitutional...
yeah...Heh, no problem Captain... I just wish Republicans would remember these things in the Constitution more often then simply when it is convenient for them.
yeah...
personally, i wish all political parties would remember it
they each have their own agenda and you can see that with any party, be it DEM or REPUB's (or etc)
and sometimes the only casualty is the constitution
meh
actually, you didn't even have to continue past that , IMHO ...whereas with Trump
not sure i agree with this, but i know people who have argued the same thingI think Obama did what he honestly thought was in the best interests of the nation...
While that is true for true "political media outlets" like Breitbart, most news outlets are made up of real journalists that are simply more congruent to one point of view or the other. Thus, you will even see FOX News occasionally report on climate change, even if they often downplay it or deny parts of it.IMHO, any politically backed media outlet is simply a tool that is used by said political party to attempt to establish a truth by repetition
I think it's based on political persecution in their own country.Soviet Jews have basically had refugee status for 50 years, solely on the basis of their religion
I think it's based on political persecution in their own country.
Define Muslim.... define Christian...?No necessity to show evidence of any persecution (like under the UN definition of refugee), but even if there were, wouldn't that be plenty of reason to show preference to Christians from Muslim countries?
And I am amused how the right wing has abandoned Christianity now that the Pope has come out against Trump's wall, and come out for the basics of Christianity (helping the poor, turning the other cheek, not turning the needy away.)I like how all the atheists have suddenly rushed to the defense of a religion, of all things, and diametrically opposed to their own ideals to boot. Unless atheists now favor subjugating women and persecuting gays.
That's a bullshit argument because many atheists support religious freedom, which includes the right to not believe. Gays and women in the US are increasingly protected under the law. I think the influence of a secular society could make religions more moderate.I like how all the atheists have suddenly rushed to the defense of a religion, of all things, and diametrically opposed to their own ideals to boot. Unless atheists now favor subjugating women and persecuting gays.
I like how all the atheists have suddenly rushed to the defense of a religion, of all things, and diametrically opposed to their own ideals to boot. Unless atheists now favor subjugating women and persecuting gays.