But you seem to insist on witnesses, so are you going to provide any or not? Scientists do insist on some kind of evidence in place of direct observation.
But you seem to insist on witnesses, so are you going to provide any or not? Scientists do insist on some kind of evidence in place of direct observation.
The bible lists the witnesses. Or are you going to claim they were imaginary as well?
Ah, so you're going to use the bible to prove the bible. Need I explain how ignorant that is?
Moreover, if we apply your fallacious reasoning regarding science, your bible and your gods don't stand a chance. Need I explain how ignorant your arguments are?
I'm going to make a prophecy now: your anti-science nonsense isn't going to last long here.
Is that why most acknowledge that much of what is in the Bible is, in fact, verifiable and has contemporary suporting evidence?So they know there is much evidence of a global flood yet deny the biblical account because it's in the bible.
Is that why most acknowledge that much of what is in the Bible is, in fact, verifiable and has contemporary suporting evidence?
If they deny the flood "because it's in the bible" why would they not deny:
The existence of the Biblical kings?
The Babylonian conquest of Persia?
Abraham?
*************I'm not sure if you're aware of this but there was no Human life in the jurassic period, so how could that have been Noah's Flood?
*************Most scientists deny the biblical flood because they claim there is no evidence that water flooded the earth even though over 200 ancient cultures have passed along accounts of a global flood where one family survived.
*************Hey God-boy, Homo sapiens is the scientific classification for modern humans. Are you fictitious?
*************I'm sure they do agree there was global food. Galileo used to say that if science contradicted God's word, the error was in our interpretation of God's word.
*************Sorry they claim there was no global flood but instead, a global ice age. Of course God doesn't say that, but who cares what God says? Certainly not scientists. So ask any scientist if he believes the biblical account of the Flood. Or better yet, look at all the posts on this forum alone which deny the Flood.
*************That is incorrect. There have been many speculations that there was an ice age based on certain observations. The sedimentary rock layers can also be used to claim there was a global Flood.
*************Sorry but Jesus said; "He who is not with me is against me."
Get educated and read what he said in the bible just like you read what scientists say in their textbooks. Only then will you be speaking from knowledge rather than your imagination. So you're right; there's no point in discussing a topic with you until you first get educated about it.
*************And as I already said, there are only a few options for "fluid flow" to create sedimentary rock layers all over the earth. And only ONE of those options has been recounted by ancient cultures; a global flood.
*************Just because you're ignorant and undereducated doesn't imply that others aren't knowledgeable or that they don't or can't understand.
Yours is a position that is to be either pitied or ridiculed.
ust because you're ignorant and undereducated doesn't imply that others aren't knowledgeable or that they don't or can't understand.
I'm ridiculed because most people here don't know that each animal can only produce its own kind.
But you don't want to be educated on the birds and the bees so you'll continue to ridicule me and live in the twilight zone where animals turn into humans.
So you ridicule me because your theory is indefensible.