The Forbidden Zone For Blacks In 2007 (racism from Latinos on Blacks)

Tazmaniac

Banned
Banned
Would you believe that in 2007???

The Forbidden Zone For Blacks In 2007
http://www.blacknews.com/pr/zone101.html

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, BlackNews.com Columnist


There’s no physical sign, barrier, or even a chalk line that marks the zone where a black can’t enter at the risk of grave harm. But the zone is there, and blacks know that if they enter it they can be beat, shot at, or killed. The twist is that the forbidden zone is not in a redneck, backwoods, and Deep South town during the rigid and violent Jim Crow segregation era. The bigger twist is that the Klan, Neo-Nazis, racist skinheads, and bikers didn’t establish the racially restrictive zone. Purported Latino gang members established it. The forbidden zone is in a small, mixed ethnic bedroom community in Los Angeles. The year is 2007, not 1947.

A black family that recently fled the community in fear for their lives bluntly told a reporter that they left because blacks there are scared to death. In the past year, the hate terror escalated to the point where blacks tell tormenting tales of being harried when they leave their homes, or their children walk to school. They say that they are forbidden to go into a park, and a convenience store.

This is not a bad case of racial paranoia run amok. Blacks have been taunted, harassed, beaten and shot at in this community. But the tragic murder of a 14-year-old black girl and the wounding of two other young blacks in the forbidden zone sparked anguish, rage, and finally drew some local media attention. The murder drew gasps of disbelieve that in America in 2007 in a big, Northern cosmopolitan city, with a Latino mayor, and that routinely back pats itself for its ethnic diversity, there is an entire area that blacks are banned from on pain of injury or death at the hands of other non-whites. And city officials seem powerless to do anything about it.




Though two reputed Latino gang members are charged with the teen’s murder, and were slapped with a hate crime charge, the arrest and the hate charge didn’t calm the jitters and fears of blacks that live there. Even after the arrests, a number of blacks still said that they planned to get out of the area as soon as they could.

Latino on black (and black on Latino) violence is hardly an aberration in Los Angeles (and other places). According to police reports, there have been more than a dozen murder attempts in other parts of Los Angeles by alleged Latino gang members on mostly young blacks that have no known gang involvement in the latter part of 2006. A Los Angeles County Human Relations Commission report on hate violence in 2005 found that overall Latinos committed nearly half of the hate attacks in the County, while blacks committed thirty percent of the hate attacks. But when it’s Latino and black violence, the figure for hate violence soars. Latinos and blacks committed the bulk of the racially motivated hate attacks against each other.

The easy explanation for the hate terror is that the perpetrators are bored, restless, disaffected, jobless, untutored, violence prone gang members, and the violence is a twisted response to racism and deprivation. The attacks no doubt are deliberately designed by the gang hate purveyors to send the message to blacks that this is our turf, and you’re an interloper. But despite arrests, police crackdowns, gang injunctions, assorted anti-violence marches and rallies, and community peace efforts, the black and Latino low intensity battle has shown no sign of abating.

Then there’s the vehemence of the racial hate. The dirty, and painful secret is that blacks and Latinos can be racist, maybe even more racist than whites, toward each other. It’s easy to see why. Many Latinos fail to understand the complexity and severity of the black experience. They frequently bash blacks for their poverty or type them as clowns, buffoons and crooks. Some routinely repeat the same vicious anti-black epithets as racist whites. The color complex reinforces the notion that blacks are a racial and competitive threat, and any distancing, ostracism, avoidance, and even violence is a rational response to keep blacks at arms length.

On the other side, some blacks feed the same myths and racial stereotypes, and bash Latinos as anti-black, and violence prone, gangsters that are a menace, as well as ethnic and economic competitors. The warped misconceptions and fears have so far trumped the loud calls and efforts by black and Latino activists and many residents for unity and peace.

The murder of a black teen, and the gradual dawning that racially motivated hate attacks are happening right under the noses of a slumbering, maybe indifferent public, and impotent city officials, in a modern-day city like Los Angeles, did touch a mild nerve of disgust and ignite faint demands for action. But that’s not nearly enough to erase the shame that in America in 2007 there is a zone in a big city that blacks can only enter at mortal peril. And that zone isn’t marked by a burning cross or guarded by men in menacing white sheets and hoods.

BlackNews.com columnist Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a political analyst and social issues commentator, and the author of The Emerging Black GOP Majority (Middle Passage Press, September 2006), a hard-hitting look at Bush and The GOP’s court of black voters. For order information, see http://www.blackgopbook.com
 
Just one more of many signs that "integration" is not only a stupid ideal that won't and can't happen, it's also damned dangerous to even try it!

Voluntary segragation is the only, ONLY way that different humans are ever going to be able to live in the same general vicinity. Forcing them to live together in close proximity is only going to make the hatred worse, and the killing get more violent and more often.

Baron Max
 
It's funny that I am actually supporting black gangs this time.

But yes, Baron Max, precisely.
 
Yeah, I just read an article in the local paper today about how Los Angeles' murder rates has dropped this year but gang-related murders has increased mainly between blacks and hispanics. The mayor said we need to put an end to these racial hate crimes. I found it weird that he talked about hate crimes where whites weren't mentioned cause usually only whites get targeted as being racist and all that, heh.

- N
 
Yeah, I just read an article in the local paper today about how Los Angeles' murder rates has dropped this year but gang-related murders has increased mainly between blacks and hispanics. The mayor said we need to put an end to these racial hate crimes. I found it weird that he talked about hate crimes where whites weren't mentioned cause usually only whites get targeted as being racist and all that, heh.

- N

If White aren't doing anything, then why would he mention them?
The gang violence is primarily between Blacks and Latinos correct?
 
If White aren't doing anything, then why would he mention them?
The gang violence is primarily between Blacks and Latinos correct?

As I mentioned, I found it "weird". The reason being that it's the first time I've ever heard of the phrase "hate crime" being used where whites weren't mentioned -- it's kind of stereotypical to assume a white person's involved. Whenever I've heard black on Mexican violence (and I've heard it a lot), the phrase "hate crime" has never come up.

- N
 
I think it is awesome that blacks are sticking up for this country and killing illegal immigrant gang members.
 
So while reading this I had a strange thought. Religion is fairly good at influencing the behaviors of people with the promise of eternal bliss or fire and brimstone.

We've got 50+ states at our disposal and maybe it makes sense to restrict / enable people to live in different places based on their behavior?
 
What did I say that was racist?

I said it was awesome that blacks are sticking up for this country and getting rid of our illegal immigrant problem at the end of a gun barrel.

I am saying black people = yay, good!

In what way is this saying my race is superior?
 
The use of the word "immigrant" in the context of Latinos was probably what aroused that comment.

The proper way to state that is, "I think it is awesome that African-Americans are sticking up for their rights and their country by combating gang members."
 
Ayodhya:

The majority of Latino gang members are illegals. It is not simply gang members that I am applauding killing (or I would be deliriously in love with tremendous amounts of urban blacks) but illegal immigrant gang members.
 
From my little experience here in NY, Latinos are the number one white-man kiss ass. White men to latinos, especially the women, are like angels. Black people don't really care. Chinese are too embroided in their ego to even notice anything, they pretty much hate everybody. Koreans in NY(where I am typing this message from like a resistance from WW2) out and out hate black people. Middle Easterns try to stay away from the jews, and Australians are too drunk. So there you are, one big happy community, ready to explode any minute.
 
It's funny that I am actually supporting black gangs this time.

But yes, Baron Max, precisely.
The point of the article is that they aren't just targetting "black gangs" but ordinary people, including small children because of their colour. Had the Latino's been white, you'd have been rooting for them instead.

I found that story to be very sad. Gang warfare is one sad fact of life, but to target small children just because of their colour. Frankly it is disgusting. A hate crime is a hate crime. But when small children are targetted, then it is even more pathetic. Both sides are losers in this.
 
It's so sad. The most-likely eternal state of human misery, that is.

The ideal of joyous intermingling of all races and nationalities is so wonderful.

But the reality of our deepest ingrained genetic predispositions is undeniable.

I believe that PJ and the Baron are correct here. Our unfortunate denial of this state of humanity is and will be a source of strife and misery until it is recognized for what it is.
 
what a white supremacist user prick you are
Unfortunately for you, he's not. He's a realist. Trying to force the ideals of a few intellectuals on the typical human population has always led to incredible misery and waste.
 
It's so sad. The most-likely eternal state of human misery, that is.

The ideal of joyous intermingling of all races and nationalities is so wonderful.

But the reality of our deepest ingrained genetic predispositions is undeniable.

I believe that PJ and the Baron are correct here. Our unfortunate denial of this state of humanity is and will be a source of strife and misery until it is recognized for what it is.

What a load of shite.
 
Back
Top