The Five Most Hated Posters

Status
Not open for further replies.
gendanken:
True, but don't you just love it when people wish the worst for you simply becuase they can't fucking stand that nasty habit you have of always being right?
Click to expand...

Bing bing bing!

For me, it's not that I'm always right but that I'm good at seeing through people and they hate, just utterly hate, a witness.

There are many reasons for being spiteful and this kind of contempt is by far the most interesting.
Click to expand...

They're afraid of intelligence more than anything else in this world.
 
Wraith:
would that please you?
Click to expand...
Don't ever confuse pleasure with amusement. I'm laughing my tits off.


For me, it's not that I'm always right but that I'm good at seeing through people and they hate, just utterly hate, a witness
Click to expand...
Oh yes- the added bonus of the prying eye. Its this pineal gland of mine seeing through those fronts people put up thinking one is not in on the game.

You know who can't stand this the most? "Intellectuals".
Lovers come second.
Relatives come third
And stupid girls are a cool runner up.



They're afraid of intelligence more than anything else in this world.
Click to expand...
Yup. Intellegence is power, privelege and justice. People either admire it, avoid it, or hold it as a misdemeanor becuase
they
can't
fucking
play.
 
Originally posted by gendanken
Look this up the next time your shuffling through your chewed up thesaurus: F.U.C.K.I.N.G liar.
Click to expand...

. . . and while I'm wondering how I'm to do that without a "chewed up thesaurus" in my possession, why don't you look up dead F.U.C.K.I.N.G wrong, you ballsy snot.
Originally posted by Xev
It is best to suggest . . . because they are stupid, not because they simply disagree.
Click to expand...

Exactly . . .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Logorrhic stool:
why don't you look up dead F.U.C.K.I.N.G wrong, you ballsy snot.
Click to expand...
And the ballsy snot will put put the declamatory, euphuistic, flowery, fustian in a fucking chokehold until he coughs up his dog-eared thesaurus.


Sevi?
 
Firstly, you must mean "logorrheic" . . .

Secondly, "fustian" cannot be used as a noun for the description of a person.

Sorry . . . snot . . . :rolleyes:
 
Want to play semantic nightmares? Lets...

Redoubtable:
Firstly, you must mean "logorrheic" . .
Click to expand...
No, dear. I mean 'logorrhic'. Think 'color' and its European counterpart 'colour'.

Secondly, "fustian" cannot be used as a noun for the description of a person.
Click to expand...
Oh? Dick is the colloquial term for a penis, yet the same is used to describe action, as in:

"Notice how our dear Redoubtable likes to dick with the bountiful, extra, unnecessary adjectives"
 
Last edited:
Gendanken

Never read "logorrhic" in my life. Deign to give me source that I can touch, feel, taste, and appreciate, and I'll consider concession, sister.

Nope . . . "fustian" should not be used as a noun to describe a person.
It does not compute . . . period.
Look it up.
Impugn, curse, and trample me.
Importune your heathen gods.
Don't respond and forget about it.
I am not concerned with whatever measures you choose to take. I am absolutely, unshakably certain about my stance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Originally posted by gendanken
Wraith:

I know. So long as "mature" equates to "godly" in your book.
Click to expand...

gend-wank-ass:

1) have you been drinking? Or do you not bother with coherent thought?
2) What book is that then wench?
3) Ok, you've got my attention.....I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt...but fuck it....let's do it.
 
Redoubtable:
I am absolutely, unshakably certain about my stance.
Click to expand...
Yes, but is it the certainty of a "ballsy snot"? That is what you called me, yes?

Impugn, curse, and trample me.
Importune your heathen gods
Click to expand...
I am my own god. Importuning her would be self defeating, baby doll.

Look it up
Click to expand...
The sorriest thing to do is think one can get a hold of the English language by just 'looking it up'.

Now where have I read it? Took me a while to find it but here goes- ever read Mr. William James? A philosopher who wrote on the psychology of religion?:
John Bunyan was a man moved by pathos. He was the "typical case of the psychotic temperatment, sensitive of conscinence to a diseased degree...and a victim of logorrhic, verbal automatism".

Mr. Enderby (by Burgess) also wrote about suffering from logorreah and used the term 'logorric'

Now, as far as "fustian" goes, have you never seen it in a Dickens novel?
 
Spooky:
take it off you hot bitch
Click to expand...
Why when you've ripped them off long ago and accused me of going through your underwear drawers?


Wraith:
gend-wank-ass:
Click to expand...
Its gendankass, gendy, genital, or porcelain princess. Now, if you want to sit there and try to cough up something witty- fine- but do it in the corner where you usually are.
 
What exactly would "godly" mean in Buddy Christ's book?
I guess it would mean . . . Dad.
 
Originally posted by gendanken Yes, but is it the certainty of a "ballsy snot"? That is what you called me, yes?
Click to expand...

It is my certainty in my stance, my position.
I'm certain that "fustian" should not be used as a noun to describe a person, and every up-to-date dictionary on earth agrees with me.
I think it can be used as an adjective to describe a person, but you used it, explicitly, as a noun to describe a person.

"John Bunyan was . . . a victim of logorrhic, verbal automatism."
Click to expand...
I am tempted to call William James' writings archaic, but I will admit that I myself am wont to use archaisms. It would be hypocrisy for me to continue criticizing you for a word which could just as easily have been born of my own fingers.

Now, as far as "fustian" goes, have you never seen it in a Dickens novel?
Click to expand...
I have only read one Dickens novel, and I would never be able to recall the particular usage of one word from that reading.
Perhaps this is a case similar to that of your "logorrhic," but since you have given no source of antiquity, I am yet unmoved.

I will search for a source in agreement with you, though.
 
Originally posted by gendanken

And the ballsy snot will put the declamatory, euphuistic, flowery, fustian in a fucking chokehold until he coughs up his dog-eared thesaurus.
Click to expand...

In this sentence, Gendanken, you used fustian as the direct object of the verb put.

"Fustian" is obviously the D.O. since it is the last word in the series "declamatory, euphuisitc, flowery, fustian," this coming immediately after the verb.

"Fustian" is then becomes the antecedent of the pronoun "he," which is, of course, masculine.
The word "fustian" is not a noun used to describe persons, and, by implication, it cannot be masculine.

The closest word I've found is "fustianist," a writer of fustian, or bombastic literature.
Source
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top