I submit that this problem will neither correct nor eradicate itself. Primarily because the problem is deliberately generated and maintained by and within a woman hating society.
This is not a guesstimate or an overstatement. It's been dealt with for a long time by distinguished persons who've done their homework (all of which has been kept in the margins and displaced with violence against women and children as standard TV programming recreational entertainment - eclipsing unknown, desperately exluded works such as)...
Susan Brownmiller's AGAINST OUR WILL: Men, Women & Rape. Eric Fromm's ANATOMY OF HUMAN DESTRUCTIVENESS, Susan Faludi's THE UNDECLARED WAR AGAINST WOMEN, Simone De Beuvoir's THE SECOND SEX, Emelie Buchwald, Pamela Fletcher & Martha Roth's TRANSFORMING A RAPE CULTURE. Marilyn French's THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN, Peggy Reeves Sandy's FRATERNITY GANG RAPE,
THE RAPE MENTALITY
Recreational Woman Hating In The U.S.
WHERE TO START-STOPPING THE INFRASTRUCTURAL SOCIAL VIOLENCE: Misogyny (Woman Hating) Revisited:
Q.) What is the most employed serious verbal insult in the United States?
A.) Fork you! (Paraphrased)
This is the undeniable infrastructure of woman hating - misogyny (for which there is no male-hating counterpart word in the English language) - in the United States.
Women may hurl the aspersion, but it's still projecting the (Fork!) role of a male on what is instantly transformed into the receiving role of a female (You!). Rarely is the insult intended in a caring manner, but rather as a categorical and angry insult, assigning the role of the male to the projector and the role of the (unwilling) female to the 'recipient' (target). Repeat. This expression and what it really means has become so much a part of the American culture that it is not recognized for what it is: the infrastructure of the rape mentality. Hear. Think. Say. Do.... (Act out.)
Review: The most commonly used male vs male verbal insult (Fork U!).
This is the direct counterpart for randomly calling a man 'queer', or 'gay', or 'corksocker', or 'bortfork' (paraphrased - in each case, projecting the role of a woman on a man. Although women do use these terms, they are simply aping what is fundamentally and by far the dominant male paradigm in issues of male insults and put downs projected on other males. It matters not what the sexuality of the target really is, he's being involuntarily cast - ready or not - into a woman's role: the role of a raped woman.. Or a woman who may be raped at any time...
This author has yet to see this phenomenological fact with which everyone is all too familiar, openly counterstated: published or controversied anywhere in the mainstream - whether you practice or agree with it or not. (People who don't practice it cannot escape hearing and otherwise being exposed to it, certainly women and children included; whereas: Nobody Wants To Talk About It. The publicly practitioning monsters reign supreme: unrestrained.)
It inevitably translates to being 'the worst thing a man can be' - a woman... Specifically, an overwhelmed, overpowered, humiliated, defeated, raped woman...
Womanization of men is - by far - the (altogether undeniably) most common angry or wry insult in the U.S. Moreover, this fact is rarely recognized as being what it is. The infrastructure of the dominant paradigm - the male rape mentality. Directly related to 'AGAINST OUR WILL', and 'WE MUST (Fork You!) STOP THE VIOLENCE. Of course it has nothing to do with currencied sex - it is categorically an assault on sex and all of the contingencies of lovemaking, intimacy, sharing and caring...
"A woman in a three piece suit is shiek.
But, a man in an evening gown is fired."
- Kent Benjamin Robertson (Book title)
Moral: Women who dress like men are acceptably manlike; whereas, men who dress like women are unacceptably woman like.
QUESTION:
What is 'gay bashing', when there is no gay to bash?
Randomly & punitively Projecting the role of a woman, on a man.
What Is (alleged) 'Homophobia' - When There Is No Queer To Fear?
ANSWER: Racist, sexist hate-crime:
(Behold: the difference between men and women in one sentence: Rape is the most common serious crime in men's prisons, whereas it is relatively unusual in women's prisons, refer: AGAINST OUR WILL: Men, Women & Rape, by Susan Brownmiller ).
The subjected 'trivial' offense (Imposing the role of a woman on a man - the 'womanisation' of men by other men) is the verbal infrastructure of woman hating and the physical act of rape: the verbal Imposition of sex where not welcome/unbelonging. Hysterically calling (especially small physically statured) white males 'fags' Is practicing the same motivational bigotry as calling black people 'ni**ers', women 'holes', Jews 'sh*enies' & 'k*kes', Mexicans-’we*backs', 'gre*sers' etc: THINGIFICATION.
Have you been verbally and publicly threatened and /or assaulted for 'suspected gayness', yet? Do you 'look like one'? 'Why do you let it (nazi bigots) bother you?'
Men who Insist they 'don't have trouble like this', see more a trivial source of 'amusement' here than a serious, invasionary matter. 'Entertainingly', unimportantly, and directly related to the fastest growing physical violence in the nation. Ho hummie.
Is anyone you know - including your mother - not threatened by such an assailant? Imagines himself more masculine whenever he 'womanizes' any other man. This is his (hysterically shouted out) way of proclaiming that he isn't queer. 'There goes a fag!', equates with 'I'm not a fag!' Berserked, hysterical male sexist madness. Woman-hating (misogyny) by any other name or alleged ('socially acceptable' and/or 'politically correct') masculine disguise.
These are all, equally: the crazymaking languages and false dilemmas of Orwellean DEATH-SPEAK. The contrived misunderstanding of exploitive, disinformation-mongering, Friendly Fascism: The establishment & encouragement of 'acceptable, amusingly unimportant', publicly-excersized woman-hating platforms: 'not to be taken seriously'. Only whiners, complainers, woman-like fags and losers/victims take opposition to 'an obvious joke' like this.
The only question remains: Are You Working For, Or Against The('Fork-U-Fag!') woman-hating Insanity Factory That Has Taken Over Your Streets, Schools And Neighborhood, via television; as 'entertainment'?
THE COMMITTEE AGAINST INFRASTRUCTURAL *RAPE MENTALITY. - Kent Benjamin Robertson, Founder.
If you can't find a female to punish, become 'Godlike' and create one; just make sure he's white and small enough 4 U 2 'handle'- 'There's a fag!' - Instant, 'politically correct' gratification for the enterprising nazi connoisseur and the chuckling woo-man on H.I.S. arm (on her knees): especially small white males have no rights, dignity or grace and must be publicly punished where opportunity affords.
How can it be racism? When one or a group of white males project this on another white male? How can it be sexism when it's males projecting on other males? The New Age, Perfectly Flawless Friendly Fascism. PASS it ON. It is a laughing matter of no importance. Remember that and 'Get Real!'
You ask where rape most originates, and how it may be recognized and stopped. I submit that the above verbal American infrastructural tradition is among its most fundamental - most unrecognized; frequently laughed about - and at - sources of origin.
(Hear. Think. Say. Do. )
No. It isn't funny. But if a man hears this and takes offense, instead of shining it on, then, 'he must be a fag (woman-like, a man who plays a woman's role)', 'otherwise it wouldn't bother him' <Re: CATCH 22>)
Feeling insecure? 'Discover and publicly announce a ("There goes a") 'fag' - it'll establish that you are more manly than whoever you've just branded to be womanlike. :bugeye:
(Whether he is or not is irrelevant, of course <Frequently the designated - random - 'target' - is not even confronted, just passing by>... Refer, thingification of others in order to aggrandize and gratify yourself at the expense of others. Dehumanization of humans. Not infrequently laughed about and joined in with...).
No, I do not happen to be, nor have I ever been 'gay'; though if I were, it wouldn't make a wit of difference, as I'm sure any reasonable person would agree...
What can be done about it? Well. Popularizing the above dissertation and placing it in the mainstream consciousness (where it presently isn't) would be a swell place to start?
(No real problem can be resolved if and when it is surrounded by a policy of feigned ignorance, uncaring, denial or underestimation. Re: 'gridlock'.)
- Kai