The most obvious problem is that you just copied and pasted it and you have absolutely no clue what any of it means.What exactly do you find wrong with the methodology, above, used to develop the Etp function?
The most obvious problem is that you just copied and pasted it and you have absolutely no clue what any of it means.What exactly do you find wrong with the methodology, above, used to develop the Etp function?
Oy. I've been giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are just pretending to be stupid, but wow. Not sure what to do with that. Try harder and maybe you'll figure it out. A little tip though: when you know what you are talking about, you don't need to put any effort into remembering your own claims because they don't change. But when you don't know what you are talking about, it is easy to forget what you are claiming from one day to the next. So, the tip: learn.The false claim you mention is in quotations but you don't mention who said it. Who made such a false claim? Please provide a post number in which I ever said such a thing. Here is what I have been consistently saying in multiple posts throughout the thread:
Of course it is. Scientific statements must be very precisely worded to be accurate. Maybe you know what you are saying is slightly improperly worded and realize it is slightly different from what I said (process having rising entropy vs universe having rising entropy, for example), and maybe you don't. Whether you are trolling on purpose or just dumb enough that you don't understand such seemingly subtle differences, I'm still not sure. What is incongruous is that your grammar is generally pretty good, which would generally indicated that you aren't a complete idiot. So that would seem to make it unlikely that your grasp of science/math/logic could be as awful as you are demonstrating. But who knows - some people I guess can be decent in verbal skills be complete morons when it comes to science/math/logic. Maybe you are. Maybe you are just blinded by your religion. Maybe you are just trolling. Regardless of which it is, there isn't any real functional difference in the result.Your post is very carefully worded.
I'm not really sure what to do with that one either. You do realize that copying and pasting something someone else said about thermodynamics does not imply that you understand thermodynamics, right? But hey - yay, you posted something accurate! Congrats! Do you want a cookie?I found a really interesting discussion about entropy on Physics Forums...
Ha ha! Yeah, I'll bet. The discussion took place on a forum where you are a moderator!I'm not really sure what to do with that one either.
True, but both INFO-MAN and Chestermiller agree with me about the thermodynamics of open systems. And what they said totally contradicts your position.You do realize that copying and pasting something someone else said about thermodynamics does not imply that you understand thermodynamics, right?
Thanks. I am glad you can finally see that it is accurate.But hey - yay, you posted something accurate! Congrats! Do you want a cookie?
Gee krash661, I am flattered you think so, but if INFO-MAN were actually my sock puppet that would mean that I sure know a lot about thermodynamics according to both Chestermiller and Russ_Watters!:krash661 said:how obvious is it that info is your sock puppet.
Ha. ha.Russ_Watters said:You do realize that copying and pasting something someone else said about thermodynamics does not imply that you understand thermodynamics, right? But hey - yay, you posted something accurate! Congrats!
how obvious is it that info is your sock puppet.
I'm quite confident that you have no idea what they were talking about and therefore couldn't possibly know if they would agree or disagree with you. In other parts of the thread I can't be sure of what is real and what isn't, but that post can be nothing but trolling.True, but both INFO-MAN and Chestermiller agree with me about the thermodynamics of open systems.
Heh.You do realize that means you have been wrong the whole time, don't you?
No, you can't have either. Cookies and medals are only awarded for real accomplishments. But when a college somewhere introduces a degree offering in Copying and Pasting Thermodynamics (a BS degree, for sure), I'll be sure to let you know.I want a medal!
A while back he put me on what I think he called "pretend ignore".I lost interest in this thread when he responded to Aqueous Id after the proclaimed ignore.
Hey look, Futilitist, I googled "entropy" and here is the result:
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=entropy
As you can see, the entire internet agrees with me. I win!
Okay, I confess. I am INFO-MAN! Ha ha!I'm quite confident that you have no idea what they were talking about and therefore couldn't possibly know if they would agree or disagree with you.
You guys all lost. Quit embarrassing yourselves.
I don't know what thermodynamics would say about your question, but I predict you are feeling pretty bad about now.You still didn't answer how thermodynamics predicts how I think and feel.
Right, we lost. Sorry to inform you if you haven't noticed, but the economy hasn't collapsed and we're all still alive. I'll let you know if either of those changes. [or maybe I won't because the economy will collapse so fast that I'll starve to death before I get a chance?]Give it up, Russ.
You guys all lost. It looks like the great Russ_Watters cost you the game!
Quit embarrassing yourselves.
"Submit"? To what? A scientific journal? Good luck with that. Scientific journals have standards. The only place beyond the forums dedicated to your religion that you can actually "submit" this without being quickly shut-down are unmoderated forums like this one. I guess we all need to try to take pleasure in even the smallest victories, but geez, not being banned from a poorly moderated and sparsely populated internet forum is aiming pretty low!And now that I have answered all of your questions, I submit once again that the Etp model is valid.
That is correct Russ. You all lost the argument and your grotesque arrogance was the cause. You need to go away now.Right, we lost.
Wait; tell the one about how accurate the ETP model is, again. That one was hilarious.This thread is to seriously discuss the Etp model. Anything else is trolling.