The Etp Model Has Been Empirically Confirmed

Status
Not open for further replies.
The false claim you mention is in quotations but you don't mention who said it. Who made such a false claim? Please provide a post number in which I ever said such a thing. Here is what I have been consistently saying in multiple posts throughout the thread:
Oy. I've been giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are just pretending to be stupid, but wow. Not sure what to do with that. Try harder and maybe you'll figure it out. A little tip though: when you know what you are talking about, you don't need to put any effort into remembering your own claims because they don't change. But when you don't know what you are talking about, it is easy to forget what you are claiming from one day to the next. So, the tip: learn.
[edit: Hmm....maybe that's why you rely so heavily on copying and pasting? Because when you try to generate your own content, you trip over your own feet/ignorance too often.]
Your post is very carefully worded.
Of course it is. Scientific statements must be very precisely worded to be accurate. Maybe you know what you are saying is slightly improperly worded and realize it is slightly different from what I said (process having rising entropy vs universe having rising entropy, for example), and maybe you don't. Whether you are trolling on purpose or just dumb enough that you don't understand such seemingly subtle differences, I'm still not sure. What is incongruous is that your grammar is generally pretty good, which would generally indicated that you aren't a complete idiot. So that would seem to make it unlikely that your grasp of science/math/logic could be as awful as you are demonstrating. But who knows - some people I guess can be decent in verbal skills be complete morons when it comes to science/math/logic. Maybe you are. Maybe you are just blinded by your religion. Maybe you are just trolling. Regardless of which it is, there isn't any real functional difference in the result.
 
Last edited:
I found a really interesting discussion about entropy on Physics Forums...
I'm not really sure what to do with that one either. You do realize that copying and pasting something someone else said about thermodynamics does not imply that you understand thermodynamics, right? But hey - yay, you posted something accurate! Congrats! Do you want a cookie?
 
I'm not really sure what to do with that one either.
Ha ha! Yeah, I'll bet. The discussion took place on a forum where you are a moderator! :confused:

You do realize that copying and pasting something someone else said about thermodynamics does not imply that you understand thermodynamics, right?
True, but both INFO-MAN and Chestermiller agree with me about the thermodynamics of open systems. And what they said totally contradicts your position. :confused:

But hey - yay, you posted something accurate! Congrats! Do you want a cookie?
Thanks. I am glad you can finally see that it is accurate.

You do realize that means you have been wrong the whole time, don't you? :confused:

I want a medal! :)



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
Russ_Watters constructed a giant lie about the Second Law of Thermodynamics in order to falsely claim the Etp model is somehow not valid. I caught him in this lie. The evidence is crystal clear on page 50.

Russ-Watters' lie fell completely apart and he fell flat on his face for all to see. :oops:

Anybody else want to try?



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
krash661 said:
how obvious is it that info is your sock puppet.
Gee krash661, I am flattered you think so, but if INFO-MAN were actually my sock puppet that would mean that I sure know a lot about thermodynamics according to both Chestermiller and Russ_Watters!:
Russ_Watters said:
You do realize that copying and pasting something someone else said about thermodynamics does not imply that you understand thermodynamics, right? But hey - yay, you posted something accurate! Congrats!
Ha. ha. :D



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
how obvious is it that info is your sock puppet.
:)

I lost interest in this thread when he responded to Aqueous Id after the proclaimed ignore. It would seem quite obsessive to make such a sock. And for all know, he's glorifying table scraps when I used the word 'and' instead 'and or'.
 
True, but both INFO-MAN and Chestermiller agree with me about the thermodynamics of open systems.
I'm quite confident that you have no idea what they were talking about and therefore couldn't possibly know if they would agree or disagree with you. In other parts of the thread I can't be sure of what is real and what isn't, but that post can be nothing but trolling.
You do realize that means you have been wrong the whole time, don't you? :confused:
Heh.
I want a medal! :)
No, you can't have either. Cookies and medals are only awarded for real accomplishments. But when a college somewhere introduces a degree offering in Copying and Pasting Thermodynamics (a BS degree, for sure), I'll be sure to let you know.

Hey look, Futilitist, I googled "entropy" and here is the result:
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=entropy
As you can see, the entire internet agrees with me. I win! :D
 
Last edited:
Give it up, Russ.

You guys all lost. It looks like the great Russ_Watters cost you the game!

Quit embarrassing yourselves. :oops:



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
I'm quite confident that you have no idea what they were talking about and therefore couldn't possibly know if they would agree or disagree with you.
Okay, I confess. I am INFO-MAN! :D Ha ha!



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
You still didn't answer how thermodynamics predicts how I think and feel.
I don't know what thermodynamics would say about your question, but I predict you are feeling pretty bad about now. :D

And now that I have answered all of your questions, I submit once again that the Etp model is valid.

Thank you all.



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Give it up, Russ.

You guys all lost. It looks like the great Russ_Watters cost you the game!

Quit embarrassing yourselves. :oops:
Right, we lost. Sorry to inform you if you haven't noticed, but the economy hasn't collapsed and we're all still alive. I'll let you know if either of those changes. ;) [or maybe I won't because the economy will collapse so fast that I'll starve to death before I get a chance?]
And now that I have answered all of your questions, I submit once again that the Etp model is valid.
"Submit"? To what? A scientific journal? Good luck with that. Scientific journals have standards. The only place beyond the forums dedicated to your religion that you can actually "submit" this without being quickly shut-down are unmoderated forums like this one. I guess we all need to try to take pleasure in even the smallest victories, but geez, not being banned from a poorly moderated and sparsely populated internet forum is aiming pretty low!
 
Right, we lost.
That is correct Russ. You all lost the argument and your grotesque arrogance was the cause. You need to go away now.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is one of the greatest achievements in the history of science. And you constructed a careful lie about it to misinform and mislead the readers of this science forum. I think this forum has rules about knowingly and intentionally presenting false information. If you persist in your squirming and trolling, I will start a thread in site feedback and get you banned.

I wonder what they would think about what you did on Physics Forums?

Shame on you, Russ. :oops:


---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh, stop, you're killing me. You really need to find a comedy club nearby that does an open mic night - you'd kill!
 
You are a very sore loser, Russ. :mad:

You must feel pretty comfortable here to flaunt this. I do hope your confidence in the management seeing things your way is unjustified. If not, that would make this fine forum a fraud, and we all know (hope) that isn't true, don't we? You really messed this up for a lot of people. You are a drowning man, Russ. You might not be as popular as you think you are.


This thread is to seriously discuss the Etp model. Anything else is trolling.



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top