The devil?
- Thread starter Perishiko
- Start date
So now you know, there's no REALITY in the bible!
Your average joe could probably also not make much sense out of the writings of a molecular physicist - doesn't mean the document is bereft of references to reality
He fell from the lord because he wanted to be the lord. He used to be second to the lord...
You really are an idiot!
The question was asked to look up the word "reality" in the bible, in a software that looks up bible quotes, hence no word "reality" was found.
So in laymans term, there's no "reality" in the bible!
The bible was writen for the average joe, yet not even scholars can agree to it's interpretation, hence 33000 different sects of christianity evolved out of the same ancient text! every average joe, is interpreting the bull shit to fit their lifestyle!
Last edited:
Please remind me, when the Bible was written, how many of these average joes were sufficiently educated to read it?
You really are an idiot!
The question was asked to look up the word "reality" in the bible, in a software that looks up bible quotes, hence no word "reality" was found.
So in laymans term, there's no "reality" in the bible!
The bible was writen for the average joe, yet not even scholars can agree to it's interpretation, hence 33000 different sects of christianity evolved out of the same ancient text! every average joe, is interpreting the bull shit to fit their lifestyle!
Seems you change your stance on whether the scripture is written for average joes when you comment as .....
hence your opening lineOh!! the beuty of it all! Most didn't know how to read, so therefore easily manipulated by these thugs called "priests" as they were the authority of the grand old bullshit buybull!
You really are an idiot!
seems to be applicable to you as well
but putting aside letting the proverbial hit the fan, actually the fracturing up of religiousity is what happens when it falls out of the hands of saintly persons - this is why god incarnates and also sends his representatives periodically to re-establish the principles of religion in all times and places on the planet (according to time place and circumstance)
It's all a matter of prespective dumb ass! The average joe can and is an assumbtion of any individual, if a priest can read, does not mean he is not a dumb ass, since he fell for the bull shit obviously he is/was, however he also saw this as a opportunity for power, and full well took advantage of the cituation. When people learned to read, the tourture stoped, people wised up a bit, however still gullible enough to follow "tradition" in some aspects.
Your religion's history has a good tell:
The Christianising of Europe
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/murderers.htm
How lovely was it back then when people din't know how to read, and gullible as your idiotic ass!
Your religion's history has a good tell:
The Christianising of Europe
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/murderers.htm
How lovely was it back then when people din't know how to read, and gullible as your idiotic ass!
And people learned to read...
And people that saw the words to heart have passed through doors of heaven...
Of course...the book spoke wisely, it wispered death inside the peoples' ears.
actually when radical Islamic fascist learned to fly they flew into American Buildings!
But then again I was refering to christianity use of torture, now a christian church can't torture you, or molest your kid, without paying for the consequence! Islam is another matter, they are at the stage where christianity was in the middle ages!
But then again I was refering to christianity use of torture, now a christian church can't torture you, or molest your kid, without paying for the consequence! Islam is another matter, they are at the stage where christianity was in the middle ages!
actually when radical Islamic fascist learned to fly they flew into American Buildings!
That is what I said...when people learned to fly they never fell again...because there were no people, because they all died...
therefore a bonafide priest or saintly person, distinct from an unqualified priest or saintly person, has certain qualities
therefore a bonafide priest or saintly person, distinct from an unqualified priest or saintly person, has certain qualities
therefore a bonafide priest or saintly person, distinct from an unqualified priest or saintly person, has certain qualitiesHow lovely was it back then when people din't know how to read, and gullible as your idiotic ass!
if you insist on examining any phenomena by its worst stereotype you run the risk of drawing conclusions that are quite a distance from the truth
What truth? that a gullible person buys in to the buybull? or quackran or any ancient text claiming crap that can't possibly be emperically demonstrated..
The only truth Lg is that reality exist, as is, you can't alter it, you can't deny it without paying the consequences of that denial.
another brilliant example ,of no doubt amongst many mor e that you can regurgitate, of the worst stereotypeWhat truth? that a gullible person buys in to the buybull? or quackran or any ancient text claiming crap that can't possibly be emperically demonstrated..
agreed - when a person makes a claim about reality without examining their ontological premises the result is foolishness
Correct, now look at yourself in the mirror, and see how many claims you have made throughout sciforums that you can't show any emperical evidence of your assertions
http://www.formalontology.it/section_4.htm
So present your evidence
Last edited: