The death of "Modern Physics". Prepair it's funeral!

Aer,

“ Originally Posted by martillo
Today Physics can't explain what is happening and call this the "wave-particle duality". Obviously is a mystery but I have already solved it! Take a look! ”

I very much doubt that you've come up with an accurate theory all on your own.
Click to expand...

You doubt but I did it!!!
 
martillo said:
Just for curiosity, you relates the factor gamma to what then?
Click to expand...
The energy-mass equation is:

E=&gamma;mc<sup>2</sup> = mc<sup>2</sup> + 1/2 mv<sup>2</sup> for v << c

So as you can see, E=mc<sup>2</sup> by itself is a measure of an objects internal energy, think of it as the mass form of energy.

And the &gamma; factor is a measure of the kinetic energy.
 
Q,

I've never seen a relativity paradox, please provide an example.
Click to expand...

I can't believe this!

The twins paradox means you something? Never heard?
.
 
Last edited:
martillo said:
Q,



I can't believe this!

The twins paradox means you something? Never heard?
Click to expand...

I don't think this is a real paradox, it is simpily a result of travelling near speed of light.
 
Yep, UnderWhelmed is correct. It is just called a paradox because the twins are suppose to be the same age by definition but after the trip are many years separated in age.
 
But you can freely choose to put the first referential to one or the other twin, and the results are opposite!
This implies a contradiction!
 
Aer,
And the γ factor is a measure of the kinetic energy.
Click to expand...

This is your own proposition. You are creating a new definition for energy!
You are inventing a new theory.
 
martillo said:
This is your own proposition. You are creating a new definition for energy!
You are inventing a new theory.
Click to expand...
No I'm not. That is the energy equation and interpretation as I was taught in college physics. Whatever you read on the internet or elsewhere is wrong. And if you migrated over from physicsforums... they are all wrong over there too. Fucking morons.
 
martillo said:
But you can freely choose to put the first referential to one or the other twin, and the results are opposite!
This implies a contradiction!
Click to expand...

Your assuming that there is an absolute frame of reference in which to base your contradiction on! :D
 
martillo said:
Q,



I can't believe this!

The twins paradox means you something? Never heard?
.
Click to expand...

It's not a paradox. In fact, it can be explained several ways.
 
Underwhelmed,

De Broglie law applies to matter. I particulary mention there the wave-lenght asssociated to electrons in the Davisson-Germer experiment.
 
Aer,

“ Originally Posted by martillo
Einstein do associate the factor gamma to mass! ”


Einstein wasn't always the brightest

Provide the reference for where Einstein does this (I do not doubt that he did, I just want to look it up).
Click to expand...

The best reference is Einstein's own book. I have the spanish translation: "Sobre la Teoría de la Relatividad Especial y General" what is traduced to something like: "About the Special and general Relativity Theories" (I don't know the exact title for the english version).
 
UnderWhelmed,

“ Originally Posted by martillo
But you can freely choose to put the first referential to one or the other twin, and the results are opposite!
This implies a contradiction! ”



Your assuming that there is an absolute frame of reference in which to base your contradiction on!
Click to expand...

No I'm not!. There's no need for an absolute referential.
 
martillo said:
Underwhelmed,

De Broglie law applies to matter. I particulary mention there the wave-lenght asssociated to electrons in the Davisson-Germer experiment.
Click to expand...

I can't say for sure, perhaps someone else can confirm this, but I believe λ = h/mv refers to wave length...
 
martillo said:
UnderWhelmed,



No I'm not!. There's no necessity of an absolute referential.
Click to expand...

Well when you say one frame is right and one is wrong, that implies that there is an absolute frame to which base all assumption off of.

Relativity shows that all frames are correct, even if they contradict one another... ;)
 
I assume both referentials as correct possible referentials but the RESULTS are opposite so there's a CONTRADICTION here and contradiction means a wrong theory!
 
UnderWhelmed,

“ Originally Posted by martillo
Underwhelmed,

De Broglie law applies to matter. I particulary mention there the wave-lenght asssociated to electrons in the Davisson-Germer experiment. ”



I can't say for sure, perhaps someone else can confirm this, but I believe λ = h/mv refers to wave length...
Click to expand...

...to a wave-lenght associated to electrons that can be measured by the Davisson-Germer experiment.

What's the problem???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top