The conference hall debate!
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Was a sockpuppet of a perma-banned member - pay him no mind
TC - you keep saying that people can convince themselves of what you are saying in spite of what science says... you DO realize that you are, in essence, asking them to ignore logic and reason in favor of a crack-theory, right?
Last edited:
Uh, TC surely, not MR (in this thread at least).
I see the similarities, but ...
My mistake - fixed. Dealing with MR in another thread... guess it's force of habit at this point... honestly, doesn't matter... trying to make sense of either is bout as useful as... well...
To the contrary , I am asking them to use their own logic in favour of a naiveness of present thought, I am asking them to rational think about the present information that lead me to conclude my idea.Was a sockpuppet of a perma-banned member - pay him no mind
TC - you keep saying that people can convince themselves of what you are saying in spite of what science says... you DO realize that you are, in essence, asking them to ignore logic and reason in favor of a crack-theory, right?
A few weeks ago according to you all , I had nothing but gibberish, of late yourself suggested I have a theory, others suggests a hypothesis, others are understanding the idea.
The idea is gaining strength, because the idea has merit because it is being understood.
Force does not make pressure? please explain
I use the word "theory" loosely... you have no actual evidence to back what you are saying up except some strange utterances... the idea has no merit because it has no basis in reality or science.
“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson
My truths are the reality , my science is using your science to show reality, I have provided lots of true observations about the process.
“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson''
That is a false statement, if that were true then science would of never changed from history. Not everything is true, it is only science until something better comes along, my observations are true reality, I observe the nature of ''light'', you have perceived I have reality.
It's still gibberish with no merit, tc. Accept it.
Gibberish yet people understand it, science has no merit with the gibberish members quote of present information,
I asked you all the frequency of ''white light'', the replies were from a low end to a high value, not the singular we observe,not an answer, and you speak of truths, why not just say we do not know the frequency of ''white light'' but we know some of the frequencies we can invent from it.
You do not desire knowledge, and you shun science; you have no idea of the basic principles of the world, yet you claim mastery over how the universe works. You are, quite simply, delusional, and without a prayer in the world.
You have my pity.
Insert mr. T's most famous quote here.
White light consists of a mix of frequencies.
I assume you have eaten bread. What is its ingredient?
We know all the frequencies that make up white light.
Force is simply force. Pressure is force applied to an area, usually via a gas or liquid.
Indeed, an apt comparison... I'm curious how he will avoid this question.
No, waterfalls spread out quite a bit when they have time to do so; look at any tall waterfall to understand this.
No, there are waves in the middle of the ocean. Go on any boat to understand this.
I think he's confused in general or a major troll.
The same as a light wave propagates .
- Status