The conference hall debate!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes.

Then explain it with calculus. Give a function to differentiate, integrate, or whatever.

I want to calculate the location of a rainbow in the sky and why colours in a secondary rainbow would appear in the opposite order.
 
Last edited:
It is really simple my idea in simple terms is that the white light value is zero, since the image of X is countable, the probability mass function fX(x) is zero for all but a countable number of values of x.
This is hilarious.
The guy that can't even manage basic algebra is telling us about probability mass function?
The guy that failed - repeatedly - to understand elemental probability on the forum you were banned from?
 
Yes.

Then explain it with calculus. Give a function to differentiate, integrate, or whatever.

I want to calculate the location of a rainbow in the sky and colours in a secondary rainbow would appear in the opposite order.
Raindrops are random, you have zero chance of predicting where a rainbow in the sky will appear. Calculus is not needed to establish white lights value is zero.
 
This is hilarious.
The guy that can't even manage basic algebra is telling us about probability mass function?
The guy that failed - repeatedly - to understand elemental probability on the forum you were banned from?
I am not telling you about probability mass function, I am quoting what it says, I do however have a great understanding of variance and variants , I use to be a poker player.

I understand that white lights function is of mixed variance that is an invariant to sight by passive rate through air and no radiation pressure build up compared to matter interaction, the passive rate being different to that of air, creating a radiation pressure equal to passive exchange rate equal to spectral content.

A continuous function of matter with a value of x compared to the white light xyz variant value of zero.
 
Well, this is the pseudo section.

I don't know exactly what standards it has.
Not sure what the standard is either but this like most of TCs posts are pretty much indecipherable gibberish or insane. So it does not seem that there is any place for this!
 
I understand that white lights function is of mixed variance that is an invariant to sight by passive rate through air and no radiation pressure build up compared to matter interaction, the passive rate being different to that of air, creating a radiation pressure equal to passive exchange rate equal to spectral content.
See now this make me believe you are just a troll getting his jolly's. Nobody could possible think that sentence makes any sense at all.
 
See now this make me believe you are just a troll getting his jolly's. Nobody could possible think that sentence makes any sense at all.
Then I presume you do not know science, I explained passive earlier in the thread, any one in science knows what pressure is, and radiation, you are trying to flame and get a reaction stop it or I will report this,
 
Why do we see this ''white light'' instead of all different colours? Why do we not see colours in ''white light'' with our eyes?
Because we perceive "all colors" as "white light." That's how our eyes work. Creatures with different eyes (specifically different receptors) would likely perceive it differently.
Why is it, that I can reflect light into your eyes using a mirror, and glare your vision by changing the intensity, making you temporary blinded by the light?
Because that's how our eyes work. They have limits on how much light they can receive and still work properly. Creatures with different eyes (specifically different adaptive responses) would not be blinded.
to much energy your brain becomes glared.
Your brain has nothing to do with dark adaptation of your eyes. That happens in your eyes.
If light reflects into my eyes to allow me to see objects, why do I not observe in a dark smoke filled room any reflective ray from a laser incident ray being aimed at my wall?
You do.
 
Because we perceive "all colors" as "white light." That's how our eyes work. Creatures with different eyes (specifically different receptors) would likely perceive it differently.

Because that's how our eyes work. They have limits on how much light they can receive and still work properly. Creatures with different eyes (specifically different adaptive responses) would not be blinded.

Your brain has nothing to do with dark adaptation of your eyes. That happens in your eyes.

You do.
So the frequency of white light is?
 
Raindrops are random, you have zero chance of predicting where a rainbow in the sky will appear.
You can predict exactly where it will appear - and it appears at the same angle to the sun every time.
Calculus is not needed to establish white lights value is zero.
White light's "value" is certainly not zero - whether that value is total energy or energy of individual bandwidths.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top