Wow! Such certainty!, such authority
! such as usual, unsupported, imagined nonsense, driven by the fact that the Electric/Plasma universe hypothesis, has faded into well deserved oblivion.
Actually your posts as usual, still reflect that
"god of the gaps" mentality with your continued use of the
"prove it" nonsense.
You have done nothing except give this forum, more of the rather lengthy unsupported rhetoric for which you have become known.
And as applies to all cranks, if you believe you have anything to invalidate the BB, or anything that supports Arp and the few cronies that are left, that cling to his defunct pseudoscience, then spit it out son!
Or better still write up a scientific paper for proper peer review.
Let me repeat it as it most certainly applies to you.........
Forums such as this, are open to any Tom, Dick, and Harry, and a wide range of nuts, cranks and quacks, to claim whatever fairy tale suits their agenda.
And of course the many claims re errors in GR and the BB and cosmology in general, that our many nuts, quacks and cranks make on forums such as this, are really impressing no one except to stroke their own little egos, and obviously will only ever occupy a tiny sliver of cyber space, to in time, die in the oblivion that such claims deserve.
You are the one who is saying that universe started from nothing, to even make such assumptions proves how wrong you truly are-explain that, please, again how can non-existence create existence and how can 3d universe exist and expand into nothing which is dimensionless?
And yoou talk about nonsense?
When people like you start proving Big Bang, it's all about belief in mathematics not in the evidence, if you actually ever believed the evidence you would never create such hypothesis, sir.
If there is one with the ego, it's the big bangers, they just cannot accept the fact they can be wrong, and they use science as a weapon, but it turns out it is the mathematical religion that is the real problem here.
If you don't follow the evidence and if you cannot find the evidence for your hypotheses than big bangers are the ones who are actually crackpots, not rebellions like me.
Virtually all the supporters of the Big Bang theory point to my lack of advanced college degrees in the necessary subjects as "proof" that I cannot possibly know what I am talking about. However, while scientific method is a valuable tool for determining the truth, history has shown that institutionalized and commercialized science is often as dogmatic as religion, with advanced degrees awarded to those students who have proven an unflagging adherence to the assumptions of the past. It was for that very reason that the theory of Epicycles lived to a ripe old age. We see the same phenomenon in action today.
Each new student has to first show adherence to established theory in order to progress to the higher levels of education and funding.
History is ripe with examples of people who achieved great scientific breakthroughs without advanced degrees because they were free to explore the "unacceptable" possibilities. Albert Einstein developed his Theory of Relativity while working as a patent clerk, and only attended graduate school afterwards. Bill Gates quit college to build computers. So did Steve Jobs. Mark Zuckerburg quit Harvard to found Facebook. Thomas Edison had almost no formal education at all. Walt Disney dropped out of High School.
Of course there is a conspiracy! And you are conducting your old crusade trying to gain support for that conspiracy.
And again your tiresome application of "prove it" is real evidence supporting the fact of your conspiracy mongering.
You mentioned that since the BB was first proposed by a priest is "proof" it is based on faith rather then scientific rational.
That alone shows the depth of ignorance in your posts in general.
The BB is not a theory about the creation of the universe: It is a theory about how the universe evolved from a hotter, denser state: In fact we actually know nothing about the instant of the BB, and are only able to apply our laws of physics and GR at t+10-43 seconds.
Therefor common sense would tell you that the possible ID creation event by some deity is still there...Perhaps our priest Father George LaMaitre had that in mind, and perhaps that is also what the Catholic church had in mind when it recognised the BB along with the evolution of life.
There is not conspiracy since it is based on historical facts, it's all about money, Big Bang hypothesis is doing just that-it earns money more than any other hypothesis.
And this is why it needs to be saved at any cost.
And mathematics is not science, direct evidences and facts are science.
If you have evidences and facts and after that you create hypothesis (in this case Big Bang), but if the hypothesis you create is unprovable-this model should be abandoned forever, it doesn't work, as simple as that, it means it is wrong and you have to go back from the beginning and start a new one, otherwise there cannot be any progress in anything-if you actually want to explain the origins of the universe.
It's interesting how you call conspiracy everything what shows the holes in the Big Bang hypothesis-it means you are the one who creates conspiracies-shame on you.
Perhaps the biggest contradiction with the Big Bang Theory is the question of the singularity. The "primordial egg" had to be a super-massive black hole. Therefore no amount of "bang", no matter how big, is going to thrust the universe out into, well, the universe.
In short, at the moment in time when the Big Bang theorists claim the universe was functioning as it does today, complete with all fundamental forces, the entirety of the universe's mass was still well within the event horizon of its own gravity well. That the well was not the product of a true singularity is irrelevant, Newton's equation provides an equivalent gravity field for a singularity or a super dense mass in a localized region.
Therefore the Big Bang, as currently described, could not have produced the universe as we see it today. At three seconds, the time the theorists claim the universe started operating as we know it, it would have come under the influence of its own gravity and unable to reach an escape velocity exceeding that of light, would have collapsed back into itself.
The "Bangers" got around this paradox with the theory that when the universe was created, it had no mass at all. Therefore, so the theory goes, there was no gravity and no reason the the bang matter (or "batter") not to escape the bang into the universe. Then, after the matter was conveniently far away from the singularity, it interacted with a particle named the Higgs Boson. Like the two tubes that come with epoxy, the Higgs Boson blended with the massless "batter" and produced normal matter with mass. How all the matter in the universe knew just when to mix the tubes together is still open to speculation, but usually the proponents of this theory start whispering about God under their breath at this point.
That's not science that's religion, because you are trying to save the Big bang hypothesis.
