[8] No entertainment value.
Sylwester's 'Everlasting theory'
- Thread starter Sylwester Kornowski
- Start date
The modern popular use of the term “Middle Ages” concerns the time of ignorance.
The Middle Ages in particle physics and cosmology concern the period of the intentional negligence of the fact that the 3-valence-quark model of the nucleons is nonsensical because for half of century it did not lead to the exact masses, magnetic moments and spins of the protons and neutrons which are the significant components of Nature.
There intentionally as well is neglected the fact that the equations of motion in quantum physics are useless because there simultaneously are different definitions of time. It causes that the quantum physics is very messy i.e. there appear many approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters to fit the theoretical results to experimental data. It disqualifies the applied methods.
There as well is the nonsensical conclusion in cosmology that today the expansion of the Universe accelerates. It follows from the wrong assumption that spacetime is continuous. In reality, spacetime is not continuous so the formula for the relativistic redshift derived within the General Theory of Relativity does not concern the Universe as a whole (the GR assumes that spacetime is continuous).
Conclusion
The QCD, the quantum physics and GR are the incomplete theories and partially incorrect. It follows from the fact that within these theories we neglect the internal structure of bare particles. In reality, the internal structure of bare particles we can decipher applying the theory of phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime described within the Everlasting Theory. This theory is intentionally neglected since 1985.
The described above abnormalities cause that the period 1948-2016(?) historians of science will call the dark period or Middle Ages in theoretical particle physics and theoretical cosmology.
Why the Everlasting Theory is the best theory?
1.
Only this theory starts from the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime i.e. from the tachyonic Higgs field what leads to conclusion that particles are the inseparable mixture of the classical and quantum physics. Such theory is mathematically very simple, starts from smallest number of initial conditions (7 parameters and 3 formulae) and gives the BEST RESULTS (hundreds of theoretical results derived from the 7 parameters only).
2.
Only this theory leads to the mass spectrum of the quarks i.e. to the initial conditions in the QCD.
3.
Only Everlasting Theory leads to ORIGIN OF THE PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL CONSTANTS APPLIED IN PHYSICS.
4.
In the Everlasting Theory, there are not ANY approximations, there are not any mathematical tricks and there are not any free parameters.
I know that I should not discuss with dunces. They completely do not understand physics but many professors as well. For example, it concerns the quantum physics. I showed that the many-worlds interpretation of the quantum physics is incorrect and it follows from the superluminal quantum entanglement. Now, the two dunces claim that there are not in existence experiments that show that signals can move with speeds higher than the speed of light. So I must explain it.
It is the experimental fact that signals between two (or more) entangled photons are moving with speeds higher than the speed of light. Just the quantum physics is non-local. Just the different parts of the entangled photon can communicate with superluminal speed (in the experiment we change polarizations of the different parts of the entangled photon). We can see INDIRECTLY that there are in existence superluminal physical objects. But it does not mean that ELECTROMAGNETIC information can propagate with speed higher than the speed of light in vacuum (i.e. in spacetime which is not the nothingness). It is because at first we must separate the different parts of the entangled photon and due to the superluminal Higgs field, the upper limit for such speed is the speed of light in vacuum (for more details you can see my book and the 23 papers).
The Middle Ages in particle physics and cosmology concern the period of the intentional negligence of the fact that the 3-valence-quark model of the nucleons is nonsensical because for half of century it did not lead to the exact masses, magnetic moments and spins of the protons and neutrons which are the significant components of Nature.
There intentionally as well is neglected the fact that the equations of motion in quantum physics are useless because there simultaneously are different definitions of time. It causes that the quantum physics is very messy i.e. there appear many approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters to fit the theoretical results to experimental data. It disqualifies the applied methods.
There as well is the nonsensical conclusion in cosmology that today the expansion of the Universe accelerates. It follows from the wrong assumption that spacetime is continuous. In reality, spacetime is not continuous so the formula for the relativistic redshift derived within the General Theory of Relativity does not concern the Universe as a whole (the GR assumes that spacetime is continuous).
Conclusion
The QCD, the quantum physics and GR are the incomplete theories and partially incorrect. It follows from the fact that within these theories we neglect the internal structure of bare particles. In reality, the internal structure of bare particles we can decipher applying the theory of phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime described within the Everlasting Theory. This theory is intentionally neglected since 1985.
The described above abnormalities cause that the period 1948-2016(?) historians of science will call the dark period or Middle Ages in theoretical particle physics and theoretical cosmology.
Why the Everlasting Theory is the best theory?
1.
Only this theory starts from the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime i.e. from the tachyonic Higgs field what leads to conclusion that particles are the inseparable mixture of the classical and quantum physics. Such theory is mathematically very simple, starts from smallest number of initial conditions (7 parameters and 3 formulae) and gives the BEST RESULTS (hundreds of theoretical results derived from the 7 parameters only).
2.
Only this theory leads to the mass spectrum of the quarks i.e. to the initial conditions in the QCD.
3.
Only Everlasting Theory leads to ORIGIN OF THE PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL CONSTANTS APPLIED IN PHYSICS.
4.
In the Everlasting Theory, there are not ANY approximations, there are not any mathematical tricks and there are not any free parameters.
I know that I should not discuss with dunces. They completely do not understand physics but many professors as well. For example, it concerns the quantum physics. I showed that the many-worlds interpretation of the quantum physics is incorrect and it follows from the superluminal quantum entanglement. Now, the two dunces claim that there are not in existence experiments that show that signals can move with speeds higher than the speed of light. So I must explain it.
It is the experimental fact that signals between two (or more) entangled photons are moving with speeds higher than the speed of light. Just the quantum physics is non-local. Just the different parts of the entangled photon can communicate with superluminal speed (in the experiment we change polarizations of the different parts of the entangled photon). We can see INDIRECTLY that there are in existence superluminal physical objects. But it does not mean that ELECTROMAGNETIC information can propagate with speed higher than the speed of light in vacuum (i.e. in spacetime which is not the nothingness). It is because at first we must separate the different parts of the entangled photon and due to the superluminal Higgs field, the upper limit for such speed is the speed of light in vacuum (for more details you can see my book and the 23 papers).
Just more nonsense! This thread STILL needs to be banished!!
Dunces write the nonsensical posts without scientific arguments to increase number of their nonsensical posts.
Thanks for the use of capitals -it's the only part of your post I read!
Beer w/Straw, I wrote it for you because I know that you can read the capitals only.
Not sure what this said, could you use capital letters or you could bold it too, I can read bold as well as capital. No need to rewrite it if it was just more silliness like superluminal neutrinos though...
Like I said, get your model peer reviewed.
Or show us observational evidence that supports that model, instead of pages and pages and pages of highly fanciful, speculative rants.
Not sure what this said, could you use capital letters or you could bold it too, I can read bold as well as capital. No need to rewrite it if it was just more silliness like superluminal neutrinos though...
Are your ears in distance characteristic for mankind?
See, for example, # 489 and many other posts concerning the superluminal neutrinos. Are you too lazy to read?Are your ears in distance characteristic for mankind?
And are YOU too lazy to write it all up and submit it for review INSTEAD OF BOTHERING US WITH ALL YOUR FOOLISHNESS???????
You completely do not understand the era of Internet.
Today it is not important where in Internet you published your papers. It can be your website or vixra or arxiv or scientific journals. Just in all mentioned places are published both correct and incorrect papers. Editors of scientific journals as well claim that some papers published in their journals are incorrect and/or nonsensical.
If some theory is interesting then people, professors as well, find it no matter where it is published.
My Everlasting Theory is published on my website, in vixra and I published books as well. Professors of physics read it as well. For example, my paper concerning the Higgs boson is cited by Professor in the Niels Bohr Institute in Denmark. For example, there is 201 unique-IP downloads of my paper titled “Derivation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and Meaning Simplification of the Dirac Theory of the Hydrogen Atom”.
On the other hand, in the scientific journals are published in my opinion the nonsensical papers based on the assumption that mass of nucleons follows from the relativistic mass of the 3 valence quarks - for 50 years its authors cannot prove that such model leads to the exact masses, magnetic moments and spins of neutrons and protons. They publish the nonsensical papers containing the equations of motions to describe the quantum processes. Authors apply many approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters (which disqualify such papers) TO FIT THE THEORETICAL RESULTS TO EXPERIMENTAL DATA. It is indeed a childish game. They publish the nonsensical conclusion that TODAY the Universe accelerates its expansion. For physicist who has intuition in physics it is obvious that such conclusion is nonsensical and I wrote the reason why cosmologists obtained such nonsensical results.
Recapitulation
In the era of Internet it is not important where you publish your theory - if it is interesting then scientific community will find it and will read it. But you should not assume that authors/professors of the nonsensical theories will publish your theory when your theory is dangerous for their business. But history of science shows that if your theory is correct then sooner or later you will be the winner.
What is the Everlasting Theory?
The Everlasting Theory I described in the book and 23 papers. This theory is based on two fundamental axioms. There are the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime composed of the superluminal and gravitationally massless pieces of space (the tachyons). It is the modified Higgs field that I refer to as well as the Newtonian spacetime. The phase transitions follow from the saturated interactions of the tachyons and lead to the superluminal binary systems of closed strings (entanglons) responsible for the quantum entanglement, lead to the binary systems of neutrinos i.e. to the Einstein-spacetime components, to the cores of baryons and to the cosmic objects/protoworlds that appeared after the era of inflation but before the observed expansion of our Universe.
Second axiom follows from the symmetrical decays of bosons that appear on the surface of the core of baryons. It leads to the Titius-Bode law for the strong interactions i.e. to the atom-like structure of baryons.
The two first phase transitions are associated with the Higgs mechanism that leads from the modified non-gravitational Higgs field to the Principle of Equivalence and to the initial conditions applied in the General Theory of Relativity. The three first phase transitions concern the particle physics whereas the structure and evolution of the most sophisticated spinor, i.e. the cosmic object/Protoworld, defined by the four phase transitions, leads to the new cosmology.
Today it is not important where in Internet you published your papers. It can be your website or vixra or arxiv or scientific journals. Just in all mentioned places are published both correct and incorrect papers. Editors of scientific journals as well claim that some papers published in their journals are incorrect and/or nonsensical.
If some theory is interesting then people, professors as well, find it no matter where it is published.
My Everlasting Theory is published on my website, in vixra and I published books as well. Professors of physics read it as well. For example, my paper concerning the Higgs boson is cited by Professor in the Niels Bohr Institute in Denmark. For example, there is 201 unique-IP downloads of my paper titled “Derivation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and Meaning Simplification of the Dirac Theory of the Hydrogen Atom”.
On the other hand, in the scientific journals are published in my opinion the nonsensical papers based on the assumption that mass of nucleons follows from the relativistic mass of the 3 valence quarks - for 50 years its authors cannot prove that such model leads to the exact masses, magnetic moments and spins of neutrons and protons. They publish the nonsensical papers containing the equations of motions to describe the quantum processes. Authors apply many approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters (which disqualify such papers) TO FIT THE THEORETICAL RESULTS TO EXPERIMENTAL DATA. It is indeed a childish game. They publish the nonsensical conclusion that TODAY the Universe accelerates its expansion. For physicist who has intuition in physics it is obvious that such conclusion is nonsensical and I wrote the reason why cosmologists obtained such nonsensical results.
Recapitulation
In the era of Internet it is not important where you publish your theory - if it is interesting then scientific community will find it and will read it. But you should not assume that authors/professors of the nonsensical theories will publish your theory when your theory is dangerous for their business. But history of science shows that if your theory is correct then sooner or later you will be the winner.
What is the Everlasting Theory?
The Everlasting Theory I described in the book and 23 papers. This theory is based on two fundamental axioms. There are the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime composed of the superluminal and gravitationally massless pieces of space (the tachyons). It is the modified Higgs field that I refer to as well as the Newtonian spacetime. The phase transitions follow from the saturated interactions of the tachyons and lead to the superluminal binary systems of closed strings (entanglons) responsible for the quantum entanglement, lead to the binary systems of neutrinos i.e. to the Einstein-spacetime components, to the cores of baryons and to the cosmic objects/protoworlds that appeared after the era of inflation but before the observed expansion of our Universe.
Second axiom follows from the symmetrical decays of bosons that appear on the surface of the core of baryons. It leads to the Titius-Bode law for the strong interactions i.e. to the atom-like structure of baryons.
The two first phase transitions are associated with the Higgs mechanism that leads from the modified non-gravitational Higgs field to the Principle of Equivalence and to the initial conditions applied in the General Theory of Relativity. The three first phase transitions concern the particle physics whereas the structure and evolution of the most sophisticated spinor, i.e. the cosmic object/Protoworld, defined by the four phase transitions, leads to the new cosmology.
Some alternate theories, even overall crazy ones, will always have some element of truth.
You also say it doesn't matter where your papers are published. That is bullshit.
I was on another forum once with another 'crazy" who was promoting eledtrodynamic spin gravity.......he also started his own web site 5 years ago [it now has two members] and published a book and also papers on his rubbish.
Guess what? It's still rubbish.
You wrote the next nonsensical post.
Do you understand history of science?
You indeed behave as a dunce. You do not understand how scientific discussion should look. Where are your scientific arguments?
But at first you should read the title of this Section - it is "Alternative Theories".
You still are trolling.
Do you understand history of science?
You indeed behave as a dunce. You do not understand how scientific discussion should look. Where are your scientific arguments?
But at first you should read the title of this Section - it is "Alternative Theories".
You still are trolling.
Here is an interesting thought, maybe if Sylwester had a better translator his conjectures would make some sense! No, I don't think so either - it was just a thought.
There is the next new evidence that the Everlasting Theory is correct.
Here
http://www.newscientist.com/article...ound-spiral-galaxy-poses-stellar-mystery.html
we can find following information.
“…the edges of the Pinwheel Galaxy are mysteriously barren, putting a wrinkle in one of the most widely held theories of galaxy growth.”
“…..its outer halo is strangely devoid of stars. This implies that the spiral galaxy has somehow grown large without feeding on many dwarfs, says van Dokkum.”
…..”But theorists may be in trouble if galaxies without haloes turn out to be common.”
““If we find that the Pinwheel is not an exception, there is something fundamentally wrong,” says van Dokkum.”
Journal reference: Astrophysical Journal Letters, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/782/2/L24 .
On the other hand, the Everlasting Theory, based on the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime, leads to new cosmology. In my book and papers, I described the inflation and evolution of the cosmic structures/protoworlds that can appear in spacetime created during the inflation.
The cosmic structures with quantized mass consist of cosmic torus+ball - such protoworlds appear similar to the NGC 4261 galaxy but their size is much greater. Inside the cosmic torus is created the cosmic loop i.e. the very early universe composed of the protogalaxies built up from the neutron black holes. Due to the quantum entanglement, there appear the bigger cosmic structures already in the cosmic loop/very-early-Universe.
When mass of protoworld reaches the quantized mass then there is the transition of the protoworld into the dark energy i.e. into the additional components of the Einstein spacetime. The inflows of the dark energy into the cosmic loop/very-early-Universe cause the expansion of the cosmic loop/very-early-Universe i.e. its exit from the black-hole state. Moreover, the inflows (and next, the protuberances) cause the increase in sizes of the protogalaxies whereas due to the gravitational interactions of the moving away protogalaxies, there appear many dwarfs galaxies between the protogalaxies.
We can see that such evolution leads to the spiral galaxies without haloes composed of many stars. On the other hand, due to the explosions of the big stars (the first generation of the stars), there should be the field composed of the iron+nickel lumps - it is the dark matter. It is very difficult to detect such dark matter because its temperature is the same as the CMB.
We should see the protogalaxies already from the beginning of expansion of the cosmic loop/very-early-Universe. Since, at the beginning, the protogalaxies were the associations of the neutron black holes so due to the inflows of the dark energy, their brightness increased from the zero. It means that it will be very difficult to detect the big protogalaxies and dwarf galaxies during the first 500 million years from the beginning of the expansion of our Universe.
The calculations concerning the solar system, M31 - Andromeda and size of the globular clusters you can find in my book (see pages 69-71). The math is very simple because Nature is very simple when we start from complete and correct set of initial conditions.
Here
http://www.newscientist.com/article...ound-spiral-galaxy-poses-stellar-mystery.html
we can find following information.
“…the edges of the Pinwheel Galaxy are mysteriously barren, putting a wrinkle in one of the most widely held theories of galaxy growth.”
“…..its outer halo is strangely devoid of stars. This implies that the spiral galaxy has somehow grown large without feeding on many dwarfs, says van Dokkum.”
…..”But theorists may be in trouble if galaxies without haloes turn out to be common.”
““If we find that the Pinwheel is not an exception, there is something fundamentally wrong,” says van Dokkum.”
Journal reference: Astrophysical Journal Letters, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/782/2/L24 .
On the other hand, the Everlasting Theory, based on the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime, leads to new cosmology. In my book and papers, I described the inflation and evolution of the cosmic structures/protoworlds that can appear in spacetime created during the inflation.
The cosmic structures with quantized mass consist of cosmic torus+ball - such protoworlds appear similar to the NGC 4261 galaxy but their size is much greater. Inside the cosmic torus is created the cosmic loop i.e. the very early universe composed of the protogalaxies built up from the neutron black holes. Due to the quantum entanglement, there appear the bigger cosmic structures already in the cosmic loop/very-early-Universe.
When mass of protoworld reaches the quantized mass then there is the transition of the protoworld into the dark energy i.e. into the additional components of the Einstein spacetime. The inflows of the dark energy into the cosmic loop/very-early-Universe cause the expansion of the cosmic loop/very-early-Universe i.e. its exit from the black-hole state. Moreover, the inflows (and next, the protuberances) cause the increase in sizes of the protogalaxies whereas due to the gravitational interactions of the moving away protogalaxies, there appear many dwarfs galaxies between the protogalaxies.
We can see that such evolution leads to the spiral galaxies without haloes composed of many stars. On the other hand, due to the explosions of the big stars (the first generation of the stars), there should be the field composed of the iron+nickel lumps - it is the dark matter. It is very difficult to detect such dark matter because its temperature is the same as the CMB.
We should see the protogalaxies already from the beginning of expansion of the cosmic loop/very-early-Universe. Since, at the beginning, the protogalaxies were the associations of the neutron black holes so due to the inflows of the dark energy, their brightness increased from the zero. It means that it will be very difficult to detect the big protogalaxies and dwarf galaxies during the first 500 million years from the beginning of the expansion of our Universe.
The calculations concerning the solar system, M31 - Andromeda and size of the globular clusters you can find in my book (see pages 69-71). The math is very simple because Nature is very simple when we start from complete and correct set of initial conditions.
In the New Scientist as well appeared an article concerning the black holes and the conclusion is as follows.
“Take what you know about black holes and throw it out.”
And it is consistent with the Everlasting Theory.
Can you see how messy is the particle physics and cosmology? In my previous post I described the problems concerning theories of galaxy growth. In this post I will explain the problems concerning black holes.
Why particle physics and cosmology are such messy? It is because scientists do not know internal structure of bare particles and spacetime. It is described correctly only in the Everlasting Theory.
The Everlasting Theory shows that spacetime is not continuous. It consists of the Einstein-spacetime components moving with the speed of light in vacuum c. They have mass and are the non-relativistic objects i.e. their mass does not depend on speed. All particles which can be observed by detectors consist of the entangled Einstein-spacetime components. Contrary to the Einstein-spacetime components, the entanglons responsible for the quantum entanglement are SUPERLUMINAL and are INVISIBLE for detectors - it leads to quantum physics.
INFORMATION of a particle is coded in motions of the entanglons. When a particle is destroyed then entanglons (i.e. information) is emitted whereas the particle transforms into the free Einstein-spacetime components.
What says the Everlasting Theory about the black holes?
There are the black holes in respect of the weak interactions - they are in the centers of the cores of baryons and centers of muons.
There are the black holes in respect of the strong interactions - they are the cores of baryons.
There are the black holes in respect of the gravitational interactions.
On surfaces of the black holes there can be particles moving with speed almost equal to the c.
Masses of the black holes ARE QUANTIZED i.e. there must be a mechanism to emit the captured additional particles (it is described within the Everlasting Theory).
Inside all black holes there is the Einstein spacetime.
Recapitulation
Black holes have internal structure. They consist of the entangled Einstein-spacetime components. Inside black holes there is the Einstein spacetime which consists of the free (i.e. not entangled) components.
How the black holes evaporate? When a surplus particle, for example interacting strongly, appears inside a strong black hole then it is destroyed. It means that the entangled Einstein-spacetime components, the particle consists of, emit the entanglons/INFORMATION so the particle transform into the FREE Einstein-spacetime components. Since the entanglons are superluminal so they can escape from the black hole i.e. INFORMATION is emitted by the black hole because INFORMATION IS SUPERLUMINAL. Due to the tremendous pressure in the Einstein spacetime, the additional Einstein-spacetime components are forced out (they are not a part of the black hole). Due to such tunnelling, the destroyed particle can be re-created outside the black hole but there as well can appear the parton shower i.e. the protuberances in the Einstein spacetime.
Of course, there as well can be information carried with luminal or subluminal speed.
“Take what you know about black holes and throw it out.”
And it is consistent with the Everlasting Theory.
Can you see how messy is the particle physics and cosmology? In my previous post I described the problems concerning theories of galaxy growth. In this post I will explain the problems concerning black holes.
Why particle physics and cosmology are such messy? It is because scientists do not know internal structure of bare particles and spacetime. It is described correctly only in the Everlasting Theory.
The Everlasting Theory shows that spacetime is not continuous. It consists of the Einstein-spacetime components moving with the speed of light in vacuum c. They have mass and are the non-relativistic objects i.e. their mass does not depend on speed. All particles which can be observed by detectors consist of the entangled Einstein-spacetime components. Contrary to the Einstein-spacetime components, the entanglons responsible for the quantum entanglement are SUPERLUMINAL and are INVISIBLE for detectors - it leads to quantum physics.
INFORMATION of a particle is coded in motions of the entanglons. When a particle is destroyed then entanglons (i.e. information) is emitted whereas the particle transforms into the free Einstein-spacetime components.
What says the Everlasting Theory about the black holes?
There are the black holes in respect of the weak interactions - they are in the centers of the cores of baryons and centers of muons.
There are the black holes in respect of the strong interactions - they are the cores of baryons.
There are the black holes in respect of the gravitational interactions.
On surfaces of the black holes there can be particles moving with speed almost equal to the c.
Masses of the black holes ARE QUANTIZED i.e. there must be a mechanism to emit the captured additional particles (it is described within the Everlasting Theory).
Inside all black holes there is the Einstein spacetime.
Recapitulation
Black holes have internal structure. They consist of the entangled Einstein-spacetime components. Inside black holes there is the Einstein spacetime which consists of the free (i.e. not entangled) components.
How the black holes evaporate? When a surplus particle, for example interacting strongly, appears inside a strong black hole then it is destroyed. It means that the entangled Einstein-spacetime components, the particle consists of, emit the entanglons/INFORMATION so the particle transform into the FREE Einstein-spacetime components. Since the entanglons are superluminal so they can escape from the black hole i.e. INFORMATION is emitted by the black hole because INFORMATION IS SUPERLUMINAL. Due to the tremendous pressure in the Einstein spacetime, the additional Einstein-spacetime components are forced out (they are not a part of the black hole). Due to such tunnelling, the destroyed particle can be re-created outside the black hole but there as well can appear the parton shower i.e. the protuberances in the Einstein spacetime.
Of course, there as well can be information carried with luminal or subluminal speed.
No it is not evidence...No your hypothesis is not correct...Yes you are still in alternative theory forum.....No, you still havn't had your hypothesis peer reviewed and/or accepted.....and that will most certainly always be the case.
If you are referring to Hawking's latest work, then you need to check out the recent two BH threads.
Nothing more than a case of journalistic sensationalism.....BH's and EH's still exist, always have existed, and will still exist in the future.
…a clairvoyant?
Where are your scientific arguments boys?
Everyone can write such nonsensical posts as you wrote.
It is obvious that the nonsensical papers concerning the galaxy growth and the nonsensical theories of black holes published in the scientific journals will be nonsensical forever and with time it will be more and more obvious.
With time, there will be next evidences that the Everlasting Theory is correct. I will write about it.
Just the SM never will lead to exact masses, magnetic moments and spins of nucleons and to origin of the physical and mathematical constants applied in physics. Unless there will appear the next mathematical tricks and free parameters but as I wrote, it is a childish game.
Can you formulate any question concerning my theory, for example, my theory of black holes? It is impossible because you did not read it. Just you assumed that it is incorrect but you are unable to point at least one mistake in it.
Where are your scientific arguments boys?
Everyone can write such nonsensical posts as you wrote.
It is obvious that the nonsensical papers concerning the galaxy growth and the nonsensical theories of black holes published in the scientific journals will be nonsensical forever and with time it will be more and more obvious.
With time, there will be next evidences that the Everlasting Theory is correct. I will write about it.
Just the SM never will lead to exact masses, magnetic moments and spins of nucleons and to origin of the physical and mathematical constants applied in physics. Unless there will appear the next mathematical tricks and free parameters but as I wrote, it is a childish game.
Can you formulate any question concerning my theory, for example, my theory of black holes? It is impossible because you did not read it. Just you assumed that it is incorrect but you are unable to point at least one mistake in it.