Survivorman Bigfoot

Michael 345 said:
His DNA tests established that the hair was from a horse, a racoon and an American Black Bear. The latter two are not native to Russia.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ex.../Yeti-bigfoot-evidence-claims-Russian-Siberia

So keen to either "prove" Bigfoot exist

or

to keep the legend alive

real "fake" Bigfoot hair is being used

:)
Click to expand...
I am so sick of bull shitters and con men.

Once I would hear these fools out but now after seeing the lattest faith healing flick I caught which has pushed me past polite tolerance ....I would simply smash their stupid faces with a front or back door..probably both one or bith at a time.
These stupid people I am sick of them...no evidence mate here let me show you the door..smack...still stupid...smack...still stupid smack...you stupid fool...smack.
Where does stupidity breed?
Lets fumigate it all...
Alex
 
Michael 345 said:
His DNA tests established that the hair was from a horse, a racoon and an American Black Bear. The latter two are not native to Russia.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ex.../Yeti-bigfoot-evidence-claims-Russian-Siberia

So keen to either "prove" Bigfoot exist

or

to keep the legend alive

real "fake" Bigfoot hair is being used

:)
Click to expand...

Yeah that's the problem with picking random hairs off of trees. They could belong to anything. Best to stick with the videos, the eyewitness accounts, the footprints, and the photos like these:

 
Last edited:
Michael 345 said:
I would agree except the hairs would have had a story as they were put forward as evidence

:)
Click to expand...

I think about the cat hair I find all over the place...in fact I think of my hair I find all over the place and conclude through these reasonabl observations that there should be big foot hair out there...I expect someone in this bigfoot cult must have claimed finding where they sleep and you would find hair there.
I put it in the just another fairey tale box.
But the other observation I make is big foot has probably more "eye witness" accounts than any God can claim.
Flat earthers, God botherers, ghost busters and UFO aliens are landing here folk are all the same ask for evidence and its mostly "so and so sayd so and they are credible because they are a retired something or other...retired something or others are just as prone to stupidity as a working one.
MR seems a smart guy and I suggest he enjoys fishing...he certainly offers irresistable bait.
Alex
 
Michael 345 said:
His DNA tests established that the hair was from a horse, a racoon and an American Black Bear. The latter two are not native to Russia.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ex.../Yeti-bigfoot-evidence-claims-Russian-Siberia

So keen to either "prove" Bigfoot exist

or

to keep the legend alive

real "fake" Bigfoot hair is being used

:)
Click to expand...

People believe what they want to believe...And I want to believe that if there is anything to big foot, God or ghosts there would be firm evidence☺

I aslo believe MR enjoys pulling our legs, and given my legs are rather attractive who could blame him.

Its cold here (I think 16 is cold anyways) ...does it get cold up your way?


Alex
 
I saw a thing on toads..they respond to a horizontal unit passing by but not a vertical unit..it must be similar with some humans they are drawn to believe bullshit...bullshit is for all practical purposes the same as cow pats...but I guess some cant see either.
Alex
 
Xelasnave.1947 said:
Its cold here (I think 16 is cold anyways) ...does it get cold up your way?
Click to expand...

Most days hovering around 32

Dry season, which just into, gets to a cold 17 at night

Time to get the doona out

Day time to hot for Bigfoot. Besides BigCroc would have two of him for breakfast

:)
 
I find it really interesting to read up on experiences such as these. I like to think that I'm the type of person who believes that Bigfoot could potentially exist but that there isn't compelling evidence to show such yet. I mean, most of the Bigfoot evidence out there can be explained by something else that's ordinary. But if someone can come up with proof that cannot be refuted, I'll join all the other enthusiasts on the other side.
 
Bigfoot. :rolleye: I can be open minded about the idea of a paranormal ''other dimension,'' but Bigfoot? It just seems like folly. Considering the procreation levels of humans, and how our earth is becoming over-populated, it begs the question -- why aren't we bumping into these creatures with great frequency?
 
wegs said:
Bigfoot. :rolleye: I can be open minded about the idea of a paranormal ''other dimension,'' but Bigfoot? It just seems like folly. Considering the procreation levels of humans, and how our earth is becoming over-populated, it begs the question -- why aren't we bumping into these creatures with great frequency?
Click to expand...
The planet is not overpopulated in a geographical sense. There are vast tracts of Earth that are unpopulated.

Just saw a documentary on a photographer who roamed the Tibetan mountains for months looking for signs of Snow Leopards.
 
DaveC426913 said:
The planet is not overpopulated in a geographical sense. There are vast tracts of Earth that are unpopulated.

Just saw a documentary on a photographer who roamed the Tibetan mountains for months looking for signs of Snow Leopards.
Click to expand...
But, there seem to be endless ''sightings'' of Sasquatch, yet none of us seem to ever catch a glimpse of one.
 
wegs said:
But, there seem to be endless ''sightings'' of Sasquatch, yet none of us seem to ever catch a glimpse of one.
Click to expand...
Agree.

settled.png
 
wegs said:
I can be open minded about the idea of a paranormal ''other dimension,'' but Bigfoot? It just seems like folly.
Click to expand...
I'd go the other way. As an "ordinary" biological, Bigfoot is much more plausible than entities that are only "explained" by woo.
Considering the procreation levels of humans, and how our earth is becoming over-populated, it begs the question -- why aren't we bumping into these creatures with great frequency?
Click to expand...
I'd be more concerned about the procreation levels of the Bigfeet. If there was a sustainable population of them, there should be a lot more sightings.
 
sideshowbob said:
I'd go the other way. As an "ordinary" biological, Bigfoot is much more plausible than entities that are only "explained" by woo.

I'd be more concerned about the procreation levels of the Bigfeet. If there was a sustainable population of them, there should be a lot more sightings.
Click to expand...
To your second point, that's what I meant. :)
 
DaveC426913 said:
The planet is not overpopulated in a geographical sense. There are vast tracts of Earth that are unpopulated.

Just saw a documentary on a photographer who roamed the Tibetan mountains for months looking for signs of Snow Leopards.
Click to expand...

Yes..over the years there have been around 3300 bigfoot sightings across the U.S. The areas they're spotted in are remote wooded areas. That explains part of why they aren't seen more often. The other is that they are probably nocturnal hunters, and tend to sleep during the daytime. Not many people rummaging around remote forestlands or swamps at night.

http://www.joshuastevens.net/visual...-years-of-bigfoot-sightings-in-us-and-canada/
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top