Pls answer these Which is being asked by a 5 yr old to this world on behalf of Jesus:bawl:.
regards.
My response: "Grow up and don't be such a crybaby. When you are older you will learn history and understand these things."
Pls answer these Which is being asked by a 5 yr old to this world on behalf of Jesus:bawl:.
regards.
Parables. If he had used parabolas, maybe there would be a lot more clarity in the messages.
You know, if there was a god, he made me the skeptical type. So it's on him. It goes back to the question, how can you believe something you don't believe?
If you have lived 1000 back and one would say to you " the air is made of a mixture if molecules. Would you believe that ?
Epicurus invented atomic theory about 300 years before Jesus was born.
In that society, with just that statement, no. But if you quantify it by explaining molecules, and showing some demonstrations of how we know this, much like how we teach kids in basic science classes, then sure.
So far the equivalent for believing in Jesus is quite lacking. In fact, much of what's provided by Christians helps to solidify my lack of belief.
Would you rather say, Democritus and his predecessor 370 BC
Suppose Jesus comes ;Then what will be the reaction of the western countries then i.e what will be their reactions or what will they do with him?Are they prepared for his welcome & his questions(especially on the present scenario where the followers of Jesus are following his preachings so well) What answer the western countries or his maximum followers will give to him when Jesus asks them about Hiroshima & Nagasaki?:shrug:
Suppose I am a 5yr old child & I ask this on behalf of Jesus to his followers.:bawl:
Need courage to answer.
regards.
@Adstar --
No true Scotsman much?
@Adstar --
Jesus also said that he came to turn son against father and daughter against mother, that he came to bring a sword, not peace.
Again, what in the definition of "christian" would prevent a christian from taking part in the bombings? Oh, that's right, nothing.
@Adstar --
Irrelevant. The fact is that you can point to nothing in the definition of "christian" which would preclude participation in those bombings. Ergo your argument is a no true Scotsman fallacy.