Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab
- Thread starter Paul W. Dixon
- Start date
"splitting the magnetic monopole" is the same sort of nonsense that "splitting the electron" would be. One is the fundamental unit of electric charge and the other is the fundamental unit of magnetic charge (not yet found). They play exactly the same roles in Maxwell's equations of EM effects, but as the magnetic monopole probably does not actually exist, the conventional form of Maxwell's equation has assumed that it does not and is thus "asymetric" wrt these two fundamental charges. I.e. you must include it and making his equation symeteric in form to explicitly ehibit the possible magnetic charge density (not assumed to be always zero, as the conventional asymetric form does.).
Are you just trolling? Or do you really think one can split the fundamental units of charge (electrical and magnetic charges)? If you do think splitting is possible, read up on the Millican "oil drop" experiment to see that that idea is nonsense.
Please give a link to this. Also, why is he waisting his time?* I.e. what is the point as none have ever been found and there are at least two standard reasons why this is so - I.e. reasons why they do not exist (except possibly for less than a minute after t = 0 of the big bang.)
----------------
*Sort of like proposing to use unicorns for plowing fields.
Not to be concerned, Billy. This particular poster is NEVER to be taken seriously because just about everything he says is a result of his misunderstanding things he has read or made up himself.
I did, however, take some time and chased down that particular fellow and his work. Sakai has never ONCE claimed - as the poster stated - to have "provided solutions" - he has only suggested various theories along that line but makes no claim whatsoever that they are even in their final stages of the thought process, much less solid solutions. (This particular poster distorts and misconstrues practically EVERYTHING he ever says - and yet claims to be scientist! Yuck!!!! He's about as far from being a scientist as my housecat is.):bugeye:
I don't take him seriously as I have come to the same conclusion, but if there was someone publishing this I would liked to have read it. Mainly because in at least two different treads I have discussed the He3 on the moon probability and also note that the Chinese space craft currently orbiting the moon is susposed to have interest in seeing if there is any there (how I do not understand, unless possibly catching some out gassing on the dark side of the moon. It does strike the moon on the sunlit side.
My main argument is that all isotopes of helium are very light and very mobile thru the tiniest fissures in solids etc. Being light, means due to "equal partition of energy," it will be with high velocity (at least in the "Mawellian tail" of the thermal distribution, which will be constantly replinished) and easily escape into space even if it were there.
As it, coming from the sun as part of the solar wind with high Kinetic energy, collides with a small colletion of surface atoms upon initial contact with the surface, it will locally heat those atoms even hotter than the noon day sun does (which is already very hot). Thus, based on my understanding and speculations, I think there is essentially no He3 to be had on the surface of the moon, but I could be wrong, and if so, want to know why. That is why I asked for a reference.
First, how dare you be so nasty towards me. If makes any difference, i held high respect for you Billy, not to be sucked in by norm. I am a scientist or usually difficult area's,and that much should be respected. I will not talk to you again, because it is quite clear you won't listen.
Yet another promise - I'll bet he breaks it, too.:bugeye:
I did break it. I keep thinking why do i waste my efforts with people like you read... but recently, i wiped the floor with you i the inseperable thread... And this is why i know i should stay. Half of you proclaim to know science, and yet so many of you don't know the basics of physics, relativity or even how to be a good person in general.
In short, its annoying little parasites like you that keep me here.
In short, its annoying little parasites like you that keep me here.
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND LOS ALAMOS
Aside from Supernova there should be other evidence for the vast energies resident in de Sitter space, what other manifestations do we observe in this
connection?
Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G., Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005) 7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar energetic domain.
All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D
Supernova from Experimentation
Aside from Supernova there should be other evidence for the vast energies resident in de Sitter space, what other manifestations do we observe in this
connection?
Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G., Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005) 7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar energetic domain.
All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D
Supernova from Experimentation
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND LOS ALAMOS
Aside from Supernova there should be other evidence for the vast energies resident in de Sitter space, what other manifestations do we observe in this
connection?
Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G., Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005) Nature, 7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar energetic domain.
All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D
Supernova from Experimentation
Aside from Supernova there should be other evidence for the vast energies resident in de Sitter space, what other manifestations do we observe in this
connection?
Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G., Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005) Nature, 7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar energetic domain.
All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D
Supernova from Experimentation
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, BROOKHAVEN, CERN AND LOST ALAMOS
With these vast amount of energies resident in de Sitter space, there should be some prescursor events which herald the forthcoming generation of a Type
Ia Supernova. We note, therefore, the observation of the generation of
preliminary event of this nature.
The next level of energetics should, under this postulation, create a reply from de Sitter space in the form of Type Ia Supernova thus destroying our planet, our solar system and a host of nearby stars. Please contact Horatiu Nastase at the RHIC at Broohaven National Laboratory of this conclusion from the theoretical formulations of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in the Einstein de Sitter Uinverse as it is now termed.
"A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said. It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US, which smashes beams of gold nuclei together at near light speeds. Horatiu Nastase says his calculations show that the core of the fireball has a striking similarity to a black hole. His work has been published on the pre-print website arxiv.org and is reported in New Scientist magazine. When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons. These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions. But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.
Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations. The Brown researcher thinks the particles are disappearing into the fireball's core and reappearing as thermal radiation, just as matter is thought to fall into a black hole and come out as "Hawking" radiation. However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole."
Should this phenomenon be the onset of transition towards de Sitter space, then under this postulation, we should discontinue this research at this time
before all is lost.
All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.
Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas!!!
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
With these vast amount of energies resident in de Sitter space, there should be some prescursor events which herald the forthcoming generation of a Type
Ia Supernova. We note, therefore, the observation of the generation of
preliminary event of this nature.
The next level of energetics should, under this postulation, create a reply from de Sitter space in the form of Type Ia Supernova thus destroying our planet, our solar system and a host of nearby stars. Please contact Horatiu Nastase at the RHIC at Broohaven National Laboratory of this conclusion from the theoretical formulations of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in the Einstein de Sitter Uinverse as it is now termed.
"A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said. It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US, which smashes beams of gold nuclei together at near light speeds. Horatiu Nastase says his calculations show that the core of the fireball has a striking similarity to a black hole. His work has been published on the pre-print website arxiv.org and is reported in New Scientist magazine. When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons. These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions. But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.
Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations. The Brown researcher thinks the particles are disappearing into the fireball's core and reappearing as thermal radiation, just as matter is thought to fall into a black hole and come out as "Hawking" radiation. However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole."
Should this phenomenon be the onset of transition towards de Sitter space, then under this postulation, we should discontinue this research at this time
before all is lost.
All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.
Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas!!!
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND LOS ALAMOS
We are now at a crucial juncture in our history of physics theory development. The older theory of relativistic cosmology has been replaced by the standard model. Yet the standard model cannot explain the precursor events towards the generation of a Type Ia Supernova.
A natural question in this connection is why are these experiments being
conducted. It may be noted in this connection that the world we see is
constructed from just six particles, three matter particles (up quarks,
down quarks and electrons), two force quanta (photons and gluons, and
Higgs bosons, There are three sets of particles where each set is heavier
than the preceeding set with the interactions of the particles in each set
being the same as the preceeding set. The standard model cannot explain
these differences. (Kane, G. (2005) The mysteries of mass, Scientific
American 293, 1, 40-48) We may postulate that the vast explosion at the
point origin of the universe may have produced at lest three wave actions
that are reflected in these increasing masses of these fundamental
particles as three separate waves propagated in the fields which embody
electromagnetism, as well as the weak and strong interatomic binding
forces. May we recommend more theoretical work in this connection rather
than empirical to leave our world intact for every child as they grow
older.
From an enginering perspective, one cannot ignore prior symptoms of collapse such as jets and leaks in a dam. Nor can one ignore cracks in the aluminum fusleage of an airplane. To ignore these prior signals yields only a recipe for disaster and in highest energy physics experimentation, a vast catastrophe from which none shall survive.
All the children will thank you for your kind efforts in their behalf.
Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas !!!
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
We are now at a crucial juncture in our history of physics theory development. The older theory of relativistic cosmology has been replaced by the standard model. Yet the standard model cannot explain the precursor events towards the generation of a Type Ia Supernova.
A natural question in this connection is why are these experiments being
conducted. It may be noted in this connection that the world we see is
constructed from just six particles, three matter particles (up quarks,
down quarks and electrons), two force quanta (photons and gluons, and
Higgs bosons, There are three sets of particles where each set is heavier
than the preceeding set with the interactions of the particles in each set
being the same as the preceeding set. The standard model cannot explain
these differences. (Kane, G. (2005) The mysteries of mass, Scientific
American 293, 1, 40-48) We may postulate that the vast explosion at the
point origin of the universe may have produced at lest three wave actions
that are reflected in these increasing masses of these fundamental
particles as three separate waves propagated in the fields which embody
electromagnetism, as well as the weak and strong interatomic binding
forces. May we recommend more theoretical work in this connection rather
than empirical to leave our world intact for every child as they grow
older.
From an enginering perspective, one cannot ignore prior symptoms of collapse such as jets and leaks in a dam. Nor can one ignore cracks in the aluminum fusleage of an airplane. To ignore these prior signals yields only a recipe for disaster and in highest energy physics experimentation, a vast catastrophe from which none shall survive.
All the children will thank you for your kind efforts in their behalf.
Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas !!!
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
His specialty is psychophysics. Whatever the hell that is.
Wait a second. This guy:
is a psychologist?
What's going on here?
is a psychologist?
What's going on here?
Headshrinker gets big head.