Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

There is no a priori ability to calculate the odds. Hence, to calculate a probability that is the best approximation to the actual outcome results in a 50/50 chance. Performing the experiment will after-the-fact determine whether the actual result should have been 0% or 100% (though at 100% we won't be around to talk about it).

Read through the references, and you'll see others conclude the 50/50 probability (which they did independently of my analysis).

I especially found interesting the 36-page anonymous article at:

http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/anon2.htm

that discusses the mini-black-hole scenario.

As I wrote in 1999 in SA, my calculations showed that risk to be zero, though my calculations might be wrong. Others asserted that it was impossible to create a mini-black-hole. Months later, theorists began predicting the possibility of creating various types of mini-black-holes. I relied upon Hawking Radiation (HR) to be a reality, though it has never been proven, in performing those calculations. Apparently since then, the idea of creating a mini-black-hole has blossomed, and so too has the questioning of the reality of HR, leaving the potential for risk from mini-black-holes.

The other main risk is, IMO, from strangelets, whether they be negative, neutral, or positive (as I've discussed extensively elsewhere in earlier posts in this thread). As for mini-black-holes, the cosmic-ray argument fails to disprove various potentially disastrous strangelet scenarios. Recent RHIC results now tend to support the potential for such scenarios.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKAVEN AND HERA

Generally speaking, the physics community is well aware of the possiblity of accessing the high-energy conditions of de Sitter space. Even though their risk assesments does not include statements in this regard, we know that these scholars are well aware of this risk. They must then feel that embarrased to admit that these risks are being taken with the lives of everyone to further their research interests and also their career goals

We need also to incude the formal warning of Dr. Walter Wagner and his colleagues regarding the formation of mini Black Holes via this highest-energy physics experimentation. A citation of an observation of the formation of a black hole at Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory was given earlier in this thread. Please accept our heartfelt thanks !!!

We need to continue with this work to bring these risks to the attention of the general public and in this way bring a halt to this research by halting their government support. These are your tax dollars which fund this research.

May we not foget the lesson learned from Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and the Last Flight of the Challenger!!!

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Wishing one and all a Most Happy New Year!!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKAVEN AND HERA

Generally speaking, the physics community is well aware of the possiblity of accessing the high-energy conditions of de Sitter space. Even though the CERN risk assesment does not include statements in this regard, we know that these scholars are well aware of this risk. They must then feel that embarrased to admit that these risks are being taken with the lives of everyone to further their research interests and also their career goals

We need also to incude the formal warning of Dr. Walter Wagner and his colleagues regarding the formation of mini Black Holes via this highest-energy physics experimentation. A citation of an observation of the formation of a black hole at Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory was given earlier in this thread. Please accept our heartfelt thanks for your timely warning !!!

We need to continue with this work to bring these risks to the attention of the general public and in this way bring a halt to this research by halting their government support. These are your tax dollars which fund this research.

May we not foget the lesson learned from Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and the Last Flight of the Challenger!!!

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Wishing one and all a Most Happy New Year!!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation[/QUOTE]
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB. CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND HERA

Central to this hypothesis is the ubiquity of life and also intelligent life in this Universe.

"The ultimate truth revealed by this line of enquiry, culminating with the investigation of DNA in the 1950s, is that there is no evidence of a special life force, but that all of life on Earth, including ourselves, is based on chemical processes. And the four most common elements involved in the chemistry of life are hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen. We are made out of exactly the raw materials which are most easily available in the Universe. The implication is that the Earth is not a special place, and that life forms based on CHON are likely to be found across the Universe, not just in our Galaxy but in others. It is the ultimate removal of humankind from any special place in the cosmos, the completion of the process that
began with Copernicus and De Revolutionibus. The Earth is an ordinary planet orbiting an ordinary star in the suburbs of an average galaxy. Our Galaxy contains hundreds of billions of stars, and there are hundreds of billions of galaxies in the visible Universe, all of them full of stars like the Sun and laced with clouds of gas and dust rich in CHON. Nothing could be further removed from the pre-Renaissance idea that the Earth was at the centre of the Universe, with the Sun and stars orbiting around it, and humankind as the unique pinnacle of creation, qualitatively different from the 'lesser' forms of life."

"As the work of Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace established in the nineteenth century , all you need to make human being out of amoebas is the process of natural selection, and plenty of time." (Gribbin, John (2002) The Scientists, New York, Random House, pp 611-612, xix)

From this evidence we may postulate the process of evolution throughout the universe, and the generation of Type Ia Supernovae via experimentation by entities much like ourselves. Let us all work together to stop this matrix of historical progression now while there is still time. All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Many thanks John Connellan for your kind words!

Wishing one and all a Very Happy New Year!!!

Yours sincerely.

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
I keep telling you guys, we just need to get Rodney McKay on the job and he will get us that supernova we're looking for.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND HERA

In conformity to the hypotheses expressed in this thread, there has been a steady increase in the luminosity at Fermilab now at:

Store 5175 New World Record AIL: 258.23e30 luminosity on Jan 12, 2007, 1524

This amount of energy is then the greatest yet seen on earth at the world's highest-energy facility. As these energies are increased further it would be
predicted on the basis of the General Theory of Relativity, that a transition to
de Sitter space will be formed in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed. The energies resident in de Sitter space are sufficient to generate a Type Ia Supernova in Batavia, Illinois. We may then destroy our planet earth, the solar system and a host near by stars.

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf!

Wishing one and all a Very Happy and Healthy New Year !!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND HERA

We need to develop a political movement immediately to counteract this progression towards the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Otherwise all is lost, since there are no other apparent means (except perhaps prayer) of halting this progression. Please note the publication in the most respected journal of science, Nature of Malcolm J. Perry's Quantum tunnelling trowards an exploding Universe? ( Nature, 320, p. 679, 1986) Where it is stated that "classically the transition from one type of solution to another is forbidden by the existence of a large potential barrier." As the energies now employed in the colliders cited in the title to this post become ever larger, the breaching of the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus becomes inevitable.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Yust wondering but this threath started in 2001 and we are 2007 now, hasn't any of these experiments occured yet?
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND HERA

We need to develop a political movement immediately to counteract this progression towards the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Otherwise all is lost, since there are no other apparent means (except perhaps prayer) of halting this progression. Please note the publication in the most respected journal of science, Nature of Malcolm J. Perry's Quantum tunnelling trowards an exploding Universe? ( Nature, 320, p. 679, 1986) Where it is stated that "classically the transition from one type of solution to another is forbidden by the existence of a large potential barrier." As the energies now employed in the colliders cited in the title to this post become ever larger, the breaching of the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus becomes inevitable.

!!!!!!!! NEW LUMINOSITY WORLD
RECORD AIL: 277.57e30 01/18/07 1800

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND HERA

We need to develop a political movement immediately to counteract this progression towards the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Otherwise all is lost, since there are no other apparent means (except perhaps prayer) of halting this progression.
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Prayer?
To what?
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND HERA

We need to develop a political movement immediately to counteract this progression towards the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Otherwise all is lost, since there are no other apparent means (except perhaps prayer) of halting this progression. Please note the publication in the most respected journal of science, Nature of Malcolm J. Perry's Quantum tunnelling trowards an exploding Universe? ( Nature, 320, p. 679, 1986) Where it is stated that "classically the transition from one type of solution to another is forbidden by the existence of a large potential barrier." As the energies now employed in the colliders cited in the title to this post become ever larger, the breaching of the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus becomes inevitable.

!!!!!!!! NEW LUMINOSITY WORLD
RECORD AIL: 277.57e30 01/18/07 1800

http://www-bd.fnal.gov/notifyservlet/www

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
I would say this thread is an other work in progress for Mr Paul Dixon, although you dont seem to have produced much work in the last few years according to your cv.

uhh .hawaii. edu/~dixon/PaulDixonCV .html
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB. BROOKHAVEN, CERN AND HERA

As the energies at Fermilab are being ramped up to ever higher levels, thus the approach to the threshold for Type Ia Supernova generation grows ever closer. This progression is plotted over time as an increase in luminosity (proton and antiproton collisional interaction). Please note:
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html So far in over 30 years if formal presentation of this to the interanational world of sceicce and news media there has been no refutation of this theoretical prediction based on the General Theory of Albert Einstein and the extension of his work by W. de Sitter.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB. BROOKHAVEN, CERN AND HERA

The energies at Fermilab are being ramped up to ever higher levels, thus the approach to the threshold for Type Ia Supernova generation grows ever closer. This progression is plotted over time as an increase in luminosity (proton and antiproton collisional interaction). Please note:
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html So far in over 30 years of formal presentation of this to the interanational world of science and news media there has been no refutation of this theoretical prediction based on the General Theory of Albert Einstein and the extension of his work by Willem de Sitter.

An additional enormous increment in energetics is now coming on line at CERN.
Please note in this connection:

"The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is a particle accelerator which will probe deeper into matter than ever before. Due to switch on in 2007, it will ultimately collide beams of protons at an energy of 14 TeV . Beams of lead nuclei will be also accelerated, smashing together with a collision energy of 1150 TeV."

It is then the intense focus of these energies which is postulated to overcome the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Best Wishes for the New Year !!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Exoerimentation
 
...this threat started in 2001 and we are 2007 now, hasn't any of these experiments occurred yet?
My point in post 997 at
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1161836&postcount=977
where I concluded that “God is moving the goal posts on Paul” and that is why the supernova has not yet occurred despite Paul’s claim that it was emanate back then, at may orders of magnitude lower luminosity production at FermiLabs.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATON AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKAHAVEN AND HERA

In the development of our technological capacity, we have now attained energies some 10 ^ -9 to 10 ^ -14 seconds after the "Big Bang" at the point origin of the Universe. The work of Michael Farady unifying electrical impulse with magnetism in 1821 may serve as a time for the beginning these discoveries leading up to the modren cryogenic accelerators. This interval of 186 years is very small in proportion to the the cosmological intervals noted in observational astronomy for Type !a Supernovae which extend back billions of years to a time near to the origin of our Universe. Type Ia Supernovae are remarkable for their singular uniformity in luminosity where they are used as standard candles for distance estimates. May we inquire whether this unifomity is due to their artificial origin? Since there is a large but not infinite potential barrier bewteen the continuum and de Sitter space, breaching this potential barrier is only a function of energy. Alas, we may soon reach this point in the history of mankind thus creating the greatest TRAGEDY OF HISTORY.

All the chidlren will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Have Paul's own words refuted his notions?
  • This interval of 186 years is very small in proportion to the the cosmological intervals noted in observational astronomy for Type !a Supernovae which extend back billions of years to a time near to the origin of our Universe. Type Ia Supernovae are remarkable for their singular uniformity in luminosity where they are used as standard candles for distance estimates. May we inquire whether this unifomity is due to their artificial origin?
Note the bolded (by me) text.

Intelligent life was not possible for the first 4-6 billion years after the Big Bang. If Type 1A supernovae appeared that early, they could not have been caused by the activities of intellent life.
 
Back
Top