Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, BROOKAHAVEN AND CERN

Following the Generalized Theory of Relativity of Albert Einstein, time may be conceived of as a fourth dimension. Should a Supernova be generated at one of the highest-energy physics colliders it may propagate along this fourth dimension in the form of a gravity wave. This should easily be detected some hours previous to the actual event in the continuum at gravity wave detector and if the collider experiment was discontinued in time this could provide evidence for a time paradox as well as saving the planet from immediate deflagration due to vast energies of Type Ia Supernova generation.
Please inform those now carrying out these observations so that they may be aware of this contingency.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5111642.stm

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, BROOHAVEN AND CERN

A phenomenological analysis may serve to clarify our description as to how the focus of energies in the CDF at Fermilab may produce a transition towards
de Sitter space within the theoretical domain of relativistic cosmology.

L = fn(N1n2/A

L is radiance, focal point of energy in this connection,
where f is the revolution frequency, n is the number of bunches,
Ni is the number of particles in each beam, and A is the cross
section of the beam. Where an intersecting storage ring may have
different degrees of emittance with low emittance found where
the particles are confined to a small distance and have nearly
the same momentum. With this equation we can predict the amount
of energy that can be focused in the cross section, and in this way
observe the amount of energy necessary to form a breach in the
potential barrier towards de Sitter space. It is thus the height (amount)
of the energy found in one location which may overcome the potential
barrier towards de Sitter space when considered from a classical
perspective. Thus the increased focus of energies now achieved
at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory constitutes the
currrent hazard of Type Ia supernova generation from a
phenomenological viewpoint.

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
There is a kind of Fermi paradox at work here; if it were possible to create a phase transition by artificial means in high energy experiments and there are other intelligent species with technological civilisations in the universe, then one or more of those civilisations might be expected to have triggered a phase transition at some time in the past.

We are still here, so that either means that either
1/ there are no other technological civilisations within our past light cone prepared to carry out such high energy experiments
or
2/ it is not possible to trigger such a phase change with high energy experiments.

Of course such an event might have already happened outside our past light cone; in this case a spherical wavefront of transition into 'lower level deSitter space' is approaching our world at the speed of light, and there is nothing we can do about it. Nor will we even know that such a 'phase change' has occured, as we will instantly cease to exist without ever perceiving the transition.

This reminds me of something Douglas Adams once said;
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something more bizarrely inexplicable.
There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
 
Paul W. Dixon said:
...L = fn(N1n2/A
L is radiance, focal point of energy in this connection,
where f is the revolution frequency, n is the number of bunches,
Ni is the number of particles in each beam, and A is the cross
section of the beam. Where an intersecting storage ring may have
different degrees of emittance with low emittance found where
the particles are confined to a small distance and have nearly
the same momentum. With this equation we can predict the amount
of energy that can be focused in the cross section, and in this way
observe the amount of energy necessary to form a breach in the
potential barrier towards de Sitter space.

It is thus the height (amount) of the energy found in one location which may overcome the potential barrier towards de Sitter space when considered from a classical perspective. Thus the increased focus of energies now achieved
at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory constitutes the currrent hazard of Type Ia supernova generation from a phenomenological viewpoint....
Click to expand...
First, let me congratulate you Paul. This post is shorter and tells something clearly. (I only came here after months of not looking because eburacum45 was the last poster and I was curious as to what he might say.)

I assume based on your equation above that, the high energy cosmic rays only give up part of their energy in their first collision and then more of it in the shower of daughters, etc. Is this why they do not prove FNL experiment is safe? I.e. not enough energy being transformed in small enough volume.

I think that the cosmic ray itself represent much more energy density, but possibly not in the rest frame of it and the first atmospheric nucleus it strikes. Would you be kind enought to calculate this energy density assuming cosmic ray has in Earth's frame 10^22 ev and is a proton striking a Nitrogen nucleus. (Assume for energy density the volume is that of the nitrogen nucleus.)

I and others have asked about cosmic rays many times but until this post you were never clear what was important (or if you were, the information was so diluted in you tirades that I missed it.) I would like to understand the facts better and now see that you can be clear, if you calm down and are concise.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN

Please note that the current luminosity at the CDF in Fermilab is some 171.2E30 which approximates the world record luminosity of 171.85E30 seen before the adjustments in emittance in Phase B of Run 2 at Fermilab. I am not familiar with the notation for both longitudinal and transverse emittance which is given in the form Pi-mm-mr for transverse emittance. These numbers need to be brought forward as energy density for cm^3. Some technical assistance is, therefore, requested in this regard.

The WORLD RECORD luminosity employed at the accelerator (Please note:
Accelerator Update on the Fermilab Home Page) was 171.85E30. In scientific
notation, this 171.85 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 171.85 x 10 to the 41st
power electron volts (171.85 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
shall all perish.

We may assume that with the improved emittance properties at Fermilab we are now at threshold for formation of a transition towards de Sitter space
thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova in Batavia, Illiinois.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN

Historically, we can follow the thought of the early geologists with the term used to refer to our earth's rate of geological change as Uniformitarianism. Thus the earth was expected to stay the same from age to age. This view was changed in recent times to the prospect on earth of plate tectonics with contintental drift as well as vast meteor strikes leading to the modern view of the "violent universe" with novae and supernovae as well as the collision of galaxies and the like. The concept of forming a transition towards de Sitter space with highest-energy physics experimentation is clearly consonant with this latter concept of the violent universe. We can then trigger an effect of this magnitude as we can also initiate an hydrogen bomb explosion using an atomic bomb as a triggering mechanism. Penetration towards de Sitter space as shown in the article by Malclom J. Perry (1986) Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? Nature 320, 679, indicates that we may breach the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

Can we not put our trust in the most respected standard model in physics which is the generalized theory of relativity by Albert Einstein and the extension of this theory by Wilhem de Sitter and offer a prudent course of action for the future rather than taking a reckless plunge into the unknown?

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN

ALL OUT TO TOTAL OBLITERATION IN THE VIOLENT UNIVERSE!!!

The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) has gone from 179.56E30 to 202.16.
In scientific notation, this 202,16 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 202.16 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (202.16 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the larges energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19tpower eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
shall all perish.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Hi - Paul. Hope you are feeling well. Again let me, as I did a few posts back, congratuate you on your new shorter post. (I even read all of this one and do have a question) BTW I am glad you have addressthe the question I asked more than a year ago about cosmic rays.
Paul W. Dixon said:
...With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermi Lab set a 179.56 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (179.56 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19tpower eV (E 19 eV). ...
Click to expand...
I would think that the density of the energy is an important factor in evaluating the risk of "punching thru" to de Sitter space and causing a "intrusional event" or as you usually say a super nova with Fermi Lab as "ground zero." Thus, I am disturbed that you do not give, or speak of, the energy density or better still the "power-time product" "four density" (Joules dissipated per cubic meter, per second).

If you are only going to be concerned with the total energy (now 1.8E43 ev) then would you give the total energy of the QEII going at top speed (I think that is almost 50 miles/hour) If that turns out to be less that 2E43, then what was the energy of the largest impact of that chain of comet pieces that ran into the back side of Jupiter (or was it Saturn?) a couple of years ago?

If you agree with my hunch that it really is the the high "power-time product" "four density" that Fermi is achieving, then please compare to one of thus "femto second high powered laser that (or the dozen of so that ar actually used) to explore the possibility of "inertial confinement" fusion.

Thanks again - hope you are as wrong as a human can be - Billy T.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN

ALL OUT TO TOTAL OBLITERATION IN THE VIOLENT UNIVERSE!!!

It may be understood in this connection that the energetics now employed at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory are those predicted for the time at some 10^-11 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to to the Big Bang at the point origin of the universe. Increments of some 43.00E30 luminosity at this level of operation must ramp perilously close to breaching the potentail barrier towards de Sitter space in a purely classical sense thus releasing a Type Ia Supernova in Batavia, Illinois. Since the research now underway at Fermilab
is concerned with the discovery of the Higgs particle, fundamental research employs this level of energetics.

The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) has gone from 179.56E30 to 22300.
In scientific notation, this 223.00 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 223.16 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (223.00 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the larges energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19tpower eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
shall all perish.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Dixon:

As we have pointed out for years, you are -full of shit-. This is entirely unsubstantiated. Similarly, a supernova is caused by the gravitic collapse of massive stars which cannot produce a counter force to prevent a collapse which, in essence, bounces back outwards.

If you are so damned concerned, stop spreading your word here, and contact Fermilabs! Hell! Contact president George W. Bush!

www.whitehouse.gov
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION A FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN

Should large energies be resident in de Sitter space, which is topologically covariant with our continuum, this should be evident as preliminary evidence for these energies is found. Thus, per example: from curent research underway at Fermilab,

Search for Large Extra Dimensions using Monojets at CDF

We present preliminary results of a search for Large Extra Dimensions using over
1 fb$^{-1}$ of ppbar collision at $\sqrt{s}$=1.96 TeV collected by the Collider
Detector at Fermilab. The experimental signature for this search is a high
energy jet and large missing transverse momentum.

All possible avenues have been continuously used to bring this matter to the attention of the world. So far, in over thirty years, no refutation of these postulations has been given. The physics community has long been aware of these vast energies and the possibility of generation of Type Ia Supernova as a result of these experiments. All of us are then responsible for our fate!

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D
Supernova from Experimentation
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN

The publication which indicates the nature of the transistion towards de
Sitter space through a large but not infiinite potential barrier is, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? (Theoretical Physics) by Malcolm
J. Perry Nature Vol. 320, 1986, p. 679."Classically, a transition from one type
of solution to the other is forbidden by the existence of a large potential barrier." In the sense of this postulation, we note that the breaching of a potential barrier classically, is only a function of energy. Those energies now
employed at Fermilab approximate those found at the point-origin of the Universe, i.e., the Big Bang in the Einsten de Sitter Universe as it is now termed. It is important to note in this connection that the energies resident in de Sitter space are well known in the scientiific listerature.

A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3 , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation. This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space.
This transition would thus form a Type Ia Supernova where the energies cited in this exegesis are clearly sufficient for Supernova generation.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimetation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN

A statistical analysis of the threshold for the transition towards de Sitter space which combines all the variables is suggested in this connection. Of particular importance, is the the variation in energies we may presume
occurs over time in de Sitter space. This would affect the energetics needed for the transition towards de Sitter space at time A with a different level of engergetics needed for this transition say at time B. Thus what is safe at time A, would not be safe at time B. This is the point made by Professor Feynman regarding the safety of the launch of the Challenger space craft.

Let us call for a moratorium on highest-energy physics experimentation untill these variables are more completly understood and this research can proceed with prudent safety.

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Paul W. Dixon said:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

The current energy levels at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have been increased from 1.2 TeV to 33 TeV (trillion electron volts) for the the Tevatron 2 trials scheduled for this March or April 2001.
Please check the Luminoisty Webpage at Fermilab to verify this enormous increase.

Clearly, this is enough energy to access those energies resident in de Sitter space thus produing a supernova. This is termed a Type Ia supernova and is used as a standard candle for distance estimates in observational astonomy.

Even though research is often risky this is an unacceptable risk since supernova production will destroy everthing out to a perimeter of some 50 light years.

Please contact me at <dixon@hawaii.edu> for further information. Go to: ( Paul Dixon Supernova) on Google.com or (Paul W. Dixon supernova) as well to check various webpages on this topic.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Click to expand...

Question.

What force/s define a particle? Could it be considered a contained field?
And if so what force/s contain said area to said field?

Could a particle be considered to comprise of smaller components?
And if so what force/s contain said area to said component/s?

Lets put the above briefly aside, and consider questioning what constitutes a joule?

Let us elaborate it, with the following...

E=mc^2 by noting the sum of inferred three dimensions can be represented any way we choose, I. e as Joule or Nm or via conversions electron volt/s.

Having considered the above lets rip 'E=mc^2" to shreds.

And apply the relationships of area to potential force.

Now lets consider the above with the following abstracts to explain the destruction of a Particle...
_________________________________________________________________

Abstracts

The whole universe is a mass with varying densities.

Around 80~90% of the Universe is mass that is near unity or near vacuum.

The above Force/s or Energy confines the rest to various compressed states.

An area defined as a Proton by current science is such a compressed area.

Only one real force exists throughout the whole universe, and this single force is towards unity.

Unity = A theoretical area that has spread out to equilibrium. "Almost unity in reality is considered an area that is near vacuum"

Every Proton exerts an outward force towards unity and this force is equal to its potential "E"

Every proton is contained and or compressed by other protons exertions defined by science as Electron/s.

Protons outward force as positive while Electrons inward force as negative.

With respects to the areas or fields where a velocity towards Unity meets with another velocity from other protons, science defines the given areas as neutrons.

If a Protons “compressed” field is allowed a velocity to unity the area or its defined "field" will gain a maximum of around C^2 area with almost zero potential to it so therefore it is considered as almost zero.

If a given field is compressed somewhere, it will gain potential which if allowed is released to all other neighbouring fields to regain unity again to which we could concede we just may have observed the energy and or forces that pertains electromagnetic propagation.
_________________________________________________________________

The above abstracts therefore don’t really rely on electromotive forces, and if we apply the various velocities to given fields of mass, it even explains why gravity is perceived as a force.

But more importantly if you apply your own figures to the above frozen moments construct, you should see whats really going on a little more clearly.
 
From Paul’s first post (Feb. 2001, 98 pages back):

“The current energy levels at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have been increased from 1.2 TeV to 33 TeV ….Clearly, this is enough energy to access those energies resident in de Sitter space thus produing a supernova. …”

From Paul’s recent (4Sept06) post:

“…the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 223.16 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (223.00 E 41 eV) {record}…”

To compare these two posts one must know that 1Tev = 10 to the 12 th power. Thus, Fermi labs has made a fantastic increases in beam energy in last 5.5 years, going from 33E12eV to 223E41eV. That is an increase of approximately 4E29 times!

I.e. Fermi’s beam is now about 400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times more energetic than the one which back in 2001 was “Clearly enough to produce a supernova.”

Paul can not be wrong, so I conclude God must be constantly making it harder to make a supernova.
 
What if they're making strangelets instead, that are slowlying accumulating in Earth's center? Any one strangelet might take millions-to-billions of years to increase its spontaneous fusion rate to a prodigious amount, as it slowly grows larger. The more they make, the less time it would take to create a 'problem'. Neutral strangelets would not be detectable.

By the way, other off-base posts would have resulted in the 'beam' having a rest-mass weight of several tons of Hydrogen. While I don't work at FermiLab, I'm pretty certain they don't accelearte that much Hydrogen. Just because he's got his figures wrong doesn't mean his conclusion is wrong - just not supported by his figures and argument.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN

Phenomenologically, the energies now employed at Fermilab are those postulated to exist some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds after the point origin of the universe showing infinite pressure, densitiy and temperature in the standard model of relativistic cosmololgy. As mentioned previously, this level of energetics should be sufficient to breach the potential barrier towards de Siitter space depending particularly on postulated variation in the energy level of de Sitter space which in the Eintsein de Sitter Uiniverse is seen as being topologcially covaraint with the continuum at every point. Malcolm J Perry's (1986) Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? (Nature 320, 24 April, p. 679) provides the theoretical physics background for this derivation from relativistic cosmology. Indeed, this understanding is well- known in the community of physics scholars.

Let us not wait for the empirical verification on these energy levels derived from relativisitic cosmollogy and act with prudent safety by declaring a moratorium on highest-energy physics experimetation at this time until futher understanding of these condtions is published in the standard peer-reviewed journals of physics.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Surpernova from Experimentation
 
Walter L. Wagner said:
By the way, other off-base posts would have resulted in the 'beam' having a rest-mass weight of several tons of Hydrogen. While I don't work at FermiLab, I'm pretty certain they don't accelearte that much Hydrogen. Just because he's got his figures wrong doesn't mean his conclusion is wrong - just not supported by his figures and argument.
Click to expand...


Off-base!? :confused: who~whaa~wear????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top