SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AF FERMILAB, CERN AND BROOKHAVEN
The central motivation for this thread is to prevent the ultimate doom for all of mankind. Where modern physics clearly reveals the presence of the high-energy condition according to the work of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter which we are protected from by a large potential barrier. The question has been raised by myself and my colleagues with the scientists as Fermilab, how this research can continue with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova as a certain result of laboratory mischance with the increased energies in the CDF at Fermilab. In a classical sense, the penetration of a potential barrier is only a function of energy. The scientists and other staff members indicated to us that 1.) They did not wish to work for "Ma Bell," Illinois. In other words for the telephone company. 2.) There was a philosophical quest for truth undergirding their research. To these replies, my colleagues indicated that this was essentially a selfish motivation since they risked the doom of everyone by their research with their energies approximating those found at the point origin of the universe. Should we accept their explanatory framework, or should we avoid this headlong rush to ultimate doom?
Gravitationally based phenomena such as the formation of black holes and strangelets would not be expected from the highly-energetic conditions either at Fermilab or Brookhaven.. In modern physics, the lower energy condition as well as de Sitter space (the higher energy condition) would be possible. As indicated in the letter to Illinois Attorney General Madigan, the postulation of an intrusional event from de Sitter space is more likely than a transition towards the lower energy condition though a transition to the lower energy condition would be possible. The entire universe would then flow into the lower energy condition. The energies now found at Fermilab will be exceeded by a factor of seven when the Large Hadron Collider at CERN begins operation. For some reason best known to the physicsts at Fermilab, they are leaving the accelerator in Batavia, Illinois. (Brumfiel, G., High-risk physics, Nature. 9 June 2005, V. 435, 7043,pp. 728-729) All of the information forwarded to sciforums has also been sent to the staff at Fermilab.
Many thanks to Porfiry and Luciano Maiani, Director of CERN, for their most kind help in this tragic concern. Please note that this prediction is based on relativistic cosmology of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter. This theory has an excellent record in predicting, explaining and controlling the data of observation in physics. Quantum mechanics is the other major theory in physics yet there still remain a number of difficulties in the explanatory framework for quantum mechanics as noted by Heisenberg and others.
Please note in the blog cited below the statements on the far right at the bottom- Calls for a moratorium of research at Fermilab. This exchange indicates that only the lack of computer error in the control of the two sets of 36 bunches of protons and antiprotons circulating at light speed in the ring at Fermilab that has kept the coalesence of energies from occuring sufficient to breach the potential barrier towards de Sitter space, Over time, with continuous operation of the ring at Fermilab the effect of noise(entropy) must occur providing for this coalesence as mentioned in this interchange with Peter H. Grabincius of Fermilab. Only a moratorium on this experimenation will preserve the life of all mankind form Type Ia Supernova
generation in Batavia, Illinois.
Please access:
http://professordixon.blogspot.com
to review the responses from both Fermilab and CERN regarding the generation of Supernova from highest-energy physics experimentation.
Other relevant documents regarding the topological covariance of the continuum and de Sitter space in the now dominant theory as given in the following letter to Attorney General Illinois Lisa Madigan are also presented in the blog. A request has been forwarded to the director of CERN to bring foward an international forum to call a halt to the highest-energy physics experimentation at Fermilab, Cern and Brookhaven RHIC should the general public decide this is the best course of action. Since this research is being carried out with public funds, let the public decide whether this research should be continued!
Should the coalesence of the of the particles and antiparticles occur due to a minor glitch in the timing mechanism in the timing computer at Fermilab the the following statistical analysis will apply to the combined energies of the particles and antiparticles in the Ring at Fermilab
Accelerator ARCHIVE on the Fermilab Home Page shows Tevatron CDF at 126.97E30 luminosity for the most recent world record at the highest-energy Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. In scientific notation, this 126.97 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 126.97 x 10 to the 41st power
electron volts (126.97 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
shall all perish.
The information provided here gives the listing of the references as well as
a philosophical perspective on de Sitter space. Thus, where there are highly
energetic conditions as at the galactic core there should be a higher frequency of Supernovae generation via the formation of transitions towards de Sitter space. This postulation, therefore anticipates a greater probability of penetrating the potential barrier towards de Sitter space under highly energetic conditons such as are found at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois.
"Given the frequency of supernovae at the galactic core..."
http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/s2.htm
Many thanks for your concern and prompt actions in this tragic progression. All our hopes and dreams are being sacrificed in this imprudent plunge into the unknown. Please forward to us any questions in this regard.
As the energies in the colliders both at Fermilab and also at Brookhaven are increased from those expected at 10^-9 to 10^-15 seconds after the point origin of the universe (Big Bang), there should occur changes in the energetics which indicate the presence of the densely energetic condition of de Sitter space,
Such has now been observed at Brookhaven where the enormously dense energy matrix of de Sitter space has created an influx of particles from the accelerator. This has given rise to thermal radiation as would be expected from this level of energetics as we follow the results from the familiar equation e=mc^2.
The next level of energetics should, under this postulation, create a reply from de Sitter space in the form of Type Ia Supernova thus destroying our planet, our solar system and a host of nearby stars. Please contact Horatiu Nastase at the RHIC at Broohaven National Laboratory of this conclusion from the theoretical formulations of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in the Einstein de Sitter Uinverse as it is now termed.
"A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said. It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US, which smashes beams of gold nuclei together at near light speeds. Horatiu Nastase says his calculations show that the core of the fireball has a striking similarity to a black hole. His work has been published on the pre-print website arxiv.org and is reported in New Scientist magazine. When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons. These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions. But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.
Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations. The Brown researcher thinks the particles are disappearing into the fireball's core and reappearing as thermal radiation, just as matter is thought to fall into a black hole and come out as "Hawking" radiation. However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.
This text was taken from this link right here:
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.co...ws.php?id=36412"
Quoted from Astro news: Man made pseudo blackhole, Astronomy, Exobiology & Cosmology
It may be understod in this connection that in over 30 years of presenting these findings from the General Theory of Relativity and the extension to
de Sitter space by Willem Sitter, there has been no refutation of this
work. Notification of the Illinois Attorney General is, therefore, in order to bring to a halt this very great and potenially tragic public endangerment
This is the question. Should we continue with this large a penalty of complete extinction for everyone for this research with greatest energies at the highest energy physics laboratory? Now again setting a new record for energies found on earth. Is this an existensial dilemma that only those who are concerned about humanity can solve? We need your help in this connection to please bring word of this public endangerment to the
Illinois Attorney General. We do, most respectfully, request a moratorium on
this highest-energy physics research until a refutation of this conceptual
framework is published in a peer-reviewed journal of highest-repute - or all must perish!
Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)
http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/~dixon/quantum_tunneling.pdf
All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Please contact Lisa Madigan, Illinois Attorney General and request that she take action in this public endangerment. A letter to her is included here:
EMERGENCY ALERT: FERMILAB HAS SHOWN 107.43E30 LUMINOSITY NOW REACHING 120.298E30 IN THE CDF FERMILAB AT SOME 2TeV A NEW WORLD RECORD, WHICH LEVEL OF OPERATION IS NOW BEING CONSISTENTLY MAINTAINED!
This research is being carried out to follow the thought of Richard P. Feynmnan among others to examine the partons of the subatomic realm of
physics. Alas, as you begin to discover the basic building block of matter you enter into the energies necessary to form a transition towards de Sitter space and release the force of a Type Ia Supernova!
15 June 2004
Lisa Madigan
Illinois Attorney General
500 South Second Street
Springfield, Ill 62706
Dear Attorney General,
May we request your interest in the onset of the very great energy increments now underway in June and July 2004 at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. There is a very great probability that this experimental apparatus will generate a supernova thus producing a very great and grave public endangerment to the personnel of the laboratory, their families, the United States of America and also the population of our planet.
A physicist, Dr. Walter Wagner,
http://www.msnbc.com/news/314049.asp?0m=T17N
has already brought suit against this forthcoming disaster in New York State and also in California. He states that the research is being brought forward without regard for the potential danger only to get the research underway. May we very respectfully call on the good offices of all concerned citizens of the world to halt this reckless plunge into the unknown on behalf of the families of all mankind.
In this connection, may we present an alternate hypothesis to that presented by Mike Perricone in the FermiNews (The Universe Lives On, June 19, 1998). This postulation may be termed the high-energy postulation wherein the equations show the attractive properties of the high-energy condition termed de Sitter space. It would, therefore, under this postulation be found that high-energy physics experimentation now coming on line at the Tevatron in our Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory would have a greater probability of releasing a supernova upon our planet and solar system by breaching the potential barrier towards the high-energy condition (de Sitter Space) than initiating a transition towards the low-energy condition. This hypothesis is based on the work of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter. Their work has proven uniformly correct in the realm of physics and would necessarily be found to be true in relativistic cosmology. (Blau, S. K., Guendelman, E. I. & Guth, A. H(1987) Physical Review D. Particle and Fields, 3, 1747-1766. To quote in this connection from Alan Guth who initiated inflationary cosmology, "one might guess that the gravitational repulsion of the false vacuum would push outward on the bubble wall, so, if the repulsion were strong enough. Not so however, say the equations of general relativity. The gravitational repulsion causes the false vacuum to swell, but the repulsion does not extend beyond the false vacuum. Objects outside the bubble wall are attracted towards the bubble, and the gravitational force on the bubble is inward." (Burns, J.O. (1990) Astronomy, 18, 28-37)
The possibility of initiating a transition towards the lower-energy condition from high-energy physics experimentation may still be present, yet this kind of transition would have far lower probability value according to the aforementioned equation.
May we very respectfully request that these transitions be modeled via computer simulation before the Tevatron at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory continues with any further experimentation at this time. To avoid any bias in understanding, publication of these results in a peer-reviewed journal of highest repute is most respectfully recommended to members of the staff at Fermilab.
It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.
A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3 , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation. This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a public endangerment as well.
This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere, the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger for their release.
With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed, and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to relativistic cosmology.
No harm will result from computer modelling of this alternate hypothesis for generation of Type Ia supernovae as a result of the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space. Yet clearly, vast harm may result form our continuing to plunge into the unknown without proper foresight concerning this possibility.
All of the children will thank you for your kind offices on their behalf. Please do what you can for them in this connection.
Your kind attention and consideration in this most salient matter are most gratefully appreciated.
All best wishes for you and your family.
With greatest respect,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology and Linguistics
Many thanks to Porfiry for his most kind help in this tragic concern.
I've not seen anything posted here from Porfiry, how is he helping?
When we thank God do we see God's name written on the mountains and trees?
So when we thank Porfiry we may not see his name written large on
all tha we see around us. We may know he is helping none the less!
