Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

EARLY WARNING FROM BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks for your concern and prompt actions in this tragic progression. All our hopes and dreams are being sacrificed in this imprudent plunge into the unknown. Please forward to us any questions in this regard.

As the energies in the colliders both at Fermilab and also at Brookhaven are increased from those expected at 10^-9 to 10^-15 seconds after the point origin of the universe (Big Bang), there should occur changes in the energetics which indicate the presence of the densely energetic condition of de Sitter space,

Such has now been observed at Brookhaven where the enormously dense energy matrix of de Sitter space has created an influx of particles from the accelerator. This has given rise to thermal radiation as would be expected from this level of energetics as we follow the results from the familiar equation e=mc^2.

The next level of energetics should, under this postulation, create a reply from de Sitter space in the form of Type Ia Supernova thus destroying our planet, our solar system and a host of nearby stars. Please contact Horatiu Nastase at the RHIC at Broohaven National Laboratory of this conclusion from the theoretical formulations of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in the Einstein de Sitter Uinverse as it is now termed.

"A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said. It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US, which smashes beams of gold nuclei together at near light speeds. Horatiu Nastase says his calculations show that the core of the fireball has a striking similarity to a black hole. His work has been published on the pre-print website arxiv.org and is reported in New Scientist magazine. When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons. These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions. But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.

Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations. The Brown researcher thinks the particles are disappearing into the fireball's core and reappearing as thermal radiation, just as matter is thought to fall into a black hole and come out as "Hawking" radiation. However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.

This text was taken from this link right here:
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.co...ws.php?id=36412"
Quoted from Astro news: Man made pseudo blackhole, Astronomy, Exobiology & Cosmology

It may be understod in this connection that in over 30 years of presenting these findings from the General Theory of Relativity and the extension to
de Sitter space by Willem Sitter, there has been no refutation of this
work. Notification of the Illinois Attorney General is, therefore, in order to bring to a halt this very great and potenially tragic public endangerment
This is the question. Should we continue with this large a penalty of complete extinction for everyone for this research with greatest energies at the highest energy physics laboratory? Now again setting a new record for energies found on earth. Is this an existensial dilemma that only those who are concerned about humanity can solve? We need your help in this connection to please bring word of this public endangerment to the
Illinois Attorney General. We do, most respectfully, request a moratorium on
this highest-energy physics research until a refutation of this conceptual
framework is published in a peer-reviewed journal of highest-repute - or all must perish!

Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/~dixon/quantum_tunneling.pdf

All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Please contact Lisa Madigan, Illinois Attorney General and request that she take action in this public endangerment. A letter to her is included here:

EMERGENCY ALERT: FERMILAB HAS SHOWN 107.43E30 LUMINOSITY NOW REACHING 120.298E30 IN THE CDF FERMILAB AT SOME 2TeV A NEW WORLD RECORD, WHICH LEVEL OF OPERATION IS NOW BEING CONSISTENTLY MAINTAINED!

This research is being carried out to follow the thought of Richard P. Feynmnan among others to examine the partons of the subatomic realm of
physics. Alas, as you begin to discover the basic building block of matter you enter into the energies necessary to form a transition towards de Sitter space and release the force of a Type Ia Supernova!

15 June 2004

Lisa Madigan
Illinois Attorney General
500 South Second Street
Springfield, Ill 62706

Dear Attorney General,

May we request your interest in the onset of the very great energy increments now underway in June and July 2004 at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. There is a very great probability that this experimental apparatus will generate a supernova thus producing a very great and grave public endangerment to the personnel of the laboratory, their families, the United States of America and also the population of our planet.

A physicist, Dr. Walter Wagner,
http://www.msnbc.com/news/314049.asp?0m=T17N
has already brought suit against this forthcoming disaster in New York State and also in California. He states that the research is being brought forward without regard for the potential danger only to get the research underway. May we very respectfully call on the good offices of all concerned citizens of the world to halt this reckless plunge into the unknown on behalf of the families of all mankind.

In this connection, may we present an alternate hypothesis to that presented by Mike Perricone in the FermiNews (The Universe Lives On, June 19, 1998). This postulation may be termed the high-energy postulation wherein the equations show the attractive properties of the high-energy condition termed de Sitter space. It would, therefore, under this postulation be found that high-energy physics experimentation now coming on line at the Tevatron in our Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory would have a greater probability of releasing a supernova upon our planet and solar system by breaching the potential barrier towards the high-energy condition (de Sitter Space) than initiating a transition towards the low-energy condition. This hypothesis is based on the work of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter. Their work has proven uniformly correct in the realm of physics and would necessarily be found to be true in relativistic cosmology. (Blau, S. K., Guendelman, E. I. & Guth, A. H(1987) Physical Review D. Particle and Fields, 3, 1747-1766. To quote in this connection from Alan Guth who initiated inflationary cosmology, "one might guess that the gravitational repulsion of the false vacuum would push outward on the bubble wall, so, if the repulsion were strong enough. Not so however, say the equations of general relativity. The gravitational repulsion causes the false vacuum to swell, but the repulsion does not extend beyond the false vacuum. Objects outside the bubble wall are attracted towards the bubble, and the gravitational force on the bubble is inward." (Burns, J.O. (1990) Astronomy, 18, 28-37)

The possibility of initiating a transition towards the lower-energy condition from high-energy physics experimentation may still be present, yet this kind of transition would have far lower probability value according to the aforementioned equation.

May we very respectfully request that these transitions be modeled via computer simulation before the Tevatron at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory continues with any further experimentation at this time. To avoid any bias in understanding, publication of these results in a peer-reviewed journal of highest repute is most respectfully recommended to members of the staff at Fermilab.

It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3 , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation. This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a public endangerment as well.

This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere, the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger for their release.

With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed, and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to relativistic cosmology.

No harm will result from computer modelling of this alternate hypothesis for generation of Type Ia supernovae as a result of the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space. Yet clearly, vast harm may result form our continuing to plunge into the unknown without proper foresight concerning this possibility.

All of the children will thank you for your kind offices on their behalf. Please do what you can for them in this connection.

Your kind attention and consideration in this most salient matter are most gratefully appreciated.

All best wishes for you and your family.

With greatest respect,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology and Linguistics

Will we get to see the responses from the attorney general? Q

IN REPLY TO THIS LETTER

Please contact the Attorney General of Illinois and request a response.
 
EARLY WARNING FROM BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Please note the high-frequecny of Type II Supernovae at the galactic center here postulated as being produced via natural high-energy physics events creating a transition towards de Sitter Space.

http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/s2.htm
 
Paul W. Dixon: I read much of the information at the link you posted, but did not find anything related to the following.
Please note the high-frequecny of Type II Supernovae at the galactic center here postulated as being produced via natural high-energy physics events creating a transition towards de Sitter Space.
Perhaps I missed the reference at that URL.

Could you provide a clue in the form of a quote of a pertinent paragraph from that site?
 
EARLY WARNING FROM BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Please note the second Heading

THE STAR, line 3

"Given the frequency of supernovae at the galactic core..."

http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/s2.htm

Many thanks for your concern and prompt actions in this tragic progression. All our hopes and dreams are being sacrificed in this imprudent plunge into the unknown. Please forward to us any questions in this regard.

As the energies in the colliders both at Fermilab and also at Brookhaven are increased from those expected at 10^-9 to 10^-15 seconds after the point origin of the universe (Big Bang), there should occur changes in the energetics which indicate the presence of the densely energetic condition of de Sitter space,

Such has now been observed at Brookhaven where the enormously dense energy matrix of de Sitter space has created an influx of particles from the accelerator. This has given rise to thermal radiation as would be expected from this level of energetics as we follow the results from the familiar equation e=mc^2.

The next level of energetics should, under this postulation, create a reply from de Sitter space in the form of Type Ia Supernova thus destroying our planet, our solar system and a host of nearby stars. Please contact Horatiu Nastase at the RHIC at Broohaven National Laboratory of this conclusion from the theoretical formulations of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in the Einstein de Sitter Uinverse as it is now termed.

"A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said. It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US, which smashes beams of gold nuclei together at near light speeds. Horatiu Nastase says his calculations show that the core of the fireball has a striking similarity to a black hole. His work has been published on the pre-print website arxiv.org and is reported in New Scientist magazine. When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons. These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions. But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.

Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations. The Brown researcher thinks the particles are disappearing into the fireball's core and reappearing as thermal radiation, just as matter is thought to fall into a black hole and come out as "Hawking" radiation. However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.

This text was taken from this link right here:
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.co...ws.php?id=36412"
Quoted from Astro news: Man made pseudo blackhole, Astronomy, Exobiology & Cosmology

It may be understod in this connection that in over 30 years of presenting these findings from the General Theory of Relativity and the extension to
de Sitter space by Willem Sitter, there has been no refutation of this
work. Notification of the Illinois Attorney General is, therefore, in order to bring to a halt this very great and potenially tragic public endangerment
This is the question. Should we continue with this large a penalty of complete extinction for everyone for this research with greatest energies at the highest energy physics laboratory? Now again setting a new record for energies found on earth. Is this an existensial dilemma that only those who are concerned about humanity can solve? We need your help in this connection to please bring word of this public endangerment to the
Illinois Attorney General. We do, most respectfully, request a moratorium on
this highest-energy physics research until a refutation of this conceptual
framework is published in a peer-reviewed journal of highest-repute - or all must perish!

Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/~dixon/quantum_tunneling.pdf

All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Please contact Lisa Madigan, Illinois Attorney General and request that she take action in this public endangerment. A letter to her is included here:

EMERGENCY ALERT: FERMILAB HAS SHOWN 107.43E30 LUMINOSITY NOW REACHING 120.298E30 IN THE CDF FERMILAB AT SOME 2TeV A NEW WORLD RECORD, WHICH LEVEL OF OPERATION IS NOW BEING CONSISTENTLY MAINTAINED!

This research is being carried out to follow the thought of Richard P. Feynmnan among others to examine the partons of the subatomic realm of
physics. Alas, as you begin to discover the basic building block of matter you enter into the energies necessary to form a transition towards de Sitter space and release the force of a Type Ia Supernova!

15 June 2004

Lisa Madigan
Illinois Attorney General
500 South Second Street
Springfield, Ill 62706

Dear Attorney General,

May we request your interest in the onset of the very great energy increments now underway in June and July 2004 at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. There is a very great probability that this experimental apparatus will generate a supernova thus producing a very great and grave public endangerment to the personnel of the laboratory, their families, the United States of America and also the population of our planet.

A physicist, Dr. Walter Wagner,
http://www.msnbc.com/news/314049.asp?0m=T17N
has already brought suit against this forthcoming disaster in New York State and also in California. He states that the research is being brought forward without regard for the potential danger only to get the research underway. May we very respectfully call on the good offices of all concerned citizens of the world to halt this reckless plunge into the unknown on behalf of the families of all mankind.

In this connection, may we present an alternate hypothesis to that presented by Mike Perricone in the FermiNews (The Universe Lives On, June 19, 1998). This postulation may be termed the high-energy postulation wherein the equations show the attractive properties of the high-energy condition termed de Sitter space. It would, therefore, under this postulation be found that high-energy physics experimentation now coming on line at the Tevatron in our Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory would have a greater probability of releasing a supernova upon our planet and solar system by breaching the potential barrier towards the high-energy condition (de Sitter Space) than initiating a transition towards the low-energy condition. This hypothesis is based on the work of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter. Their work has proven uniformly correct in the realm of physics and would necessarily be found to be true in relativistic cosmology. (Blau, S. K., Guendelman, E. I. & Guth, A. H(1987) Physical Review D. Particle and Fields, 3, 1747-1766. To quote in this connection from Alan Guth who initiated inflationary cosmology, "one might guess that the gravitational repulsion of the false vacuum would push outward on the bubble wall, so, if the repulsion were strong enough. Not so however, say the equations of general relativity. The gravitational repulsion causes the false vacuum to swell, but the repulsion does not extend beyond the false vacuum. Objects outside the bubble wall are attracted towards the bubble, and the gravitational force on the bubble is inward." (Burns, J.O. (1990) Astronomy, 18, 28-37)

The possibility of initiating a transition towards the lower-energy condition from high-energy physics experimentation may still be present, yet this kind of transition would have far lower probability value according to the aforementioned equation.

May we very respectfully request that these transitions be modeled via computer simulation before the Tevatron at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory continues with any further experimentation at this time. To avoid any bias in understanding, publication of these results in a peer-reviewed journal of highest repute is most respectfully recommended to members of the staff at Fermilab.

It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3 , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation. This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a public endangerment as well.

This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere, the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger for their release.

With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed, and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to relativistic cosmology.

No harm will result from computer modelling of this alternate hypothesis for generation of Type Ia supernovae as a result of the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space. Yet clearly, vast harm may result form our continuing to plunge into the unknown without proper foresight concerning this possibility.

All of the children will thank you for your kind offices on their behalf. Please do what you can for them in this connection.

Your kind attention and consideration in this most salient matter are most gratefully appreciated.

All best wishes for you and your family.

With greatest respect,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology and Linguistics

Will we get to see the responses from the attorney general? Q

IN REPLY TO THIS LETTER

Please contact the Attorney General of Illinois and request a response.
 
Last edited:
Paul W. Dixon: I saw no mention of De Sitter space at the posted site. Instead of making a vague reference to a paragraph heading please quote a sentence or two. Otherwise admit that you made an erroneous citation in hopes that nobody would notice.
 
EARLY WARNING FROM BROOHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks for your kind actions in this tragic concern.

As was indicated in the the original statement,it is postulated that Type II
Supernovae have origin in de Sitter space. To state so indicates that under
this postulation the high-energy conditions at the galactic center create this transition towards de Sitter space more frequently thus engendering more frequent Supernovae.

Thus the processes of science involve the formulation of hypotheses which are then either supported or refuted through the processes of observation.
In the sense of this postulation, therefore, the high-energy physics experimentation at Fermilab is testing the hypothesis that in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed, sufficient energy will breach the potential barrier towards the de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova in Batavia, Illinois.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Good Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
EARLY WARNING FROM BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this tragic concern.

The information provided here gives the listing of the references as well as
a philosophical perspective on de Sitter space. Thus, where there are highly
energetic conditions as at the galactic core there should be a higher frequency of Supernovae generation via the formation of transitions towards de Sitter space. This postulation, therefore anticipates a greater probability of penetrating the potential barrier towards de Sitter space under highly energetic conditons such as are found at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois.

"Given the frequency of supernovae at the galactic core..."

http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/s2.htm

Many thanks for your concern and prompt actions in this tragic progression. All our hopes and dreams are being sacrificed in this imprudent plunge into the unknown. Please forward to us any questions in this regard.

As the energies in the colliders both at Fermilab and also at Brookhaven are increased from those expected at 10^-9 to 10^-15 seconds after the point origin of the universe (Big Bang), there should occur changes in the energetics which indicate the presence of the densely energetic condition of de Sitter space,

Such has now been observed at Brookhaven where the enormously dense energy matrix of de Sitter space has created an influx of particles from the accelerator. This has given rise to thermal radiation as would be expected from this level of energetics as we follow the results from the familiar equation e=mc^2.

The next level of energetics should, under this postulation, create a reply from de Sitter space in the form of Type Ia Supernova thus destroying our planet, our solar system and a host of nearby stars. Please contact Horatiu Nastase at the RHIC at Broohaven National Laboratory of this conclusion from the theoretical formulations of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in the Einstein de Sitter Uinverse as it is now termed.

"A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said. It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US, which smashes beams of gold nuclei together at near light speeds. Horatiu Nastase says his calculations show that the core of the fireball has a striking similarity to a black hole. His work has been published on the pre-print website arxiv.org and is reported in New Scientist magazine. When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons. These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions. But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.

Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations. The Brown researcher thinks the particles are disappearing into the fireball's core and reappearing as thermal radiation, just as matter is thought to fall into a black hole and come out as "Hawking" radiation. However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.

This text was taken from this link right here:
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.co...ws.php?id=36412"
Quoted from Astro news: Man made pseudo blackhole, Astronomy, Exobiology & Cosmology

It may be understod in this connection that in over 30 years of presenting these findings from the General Theory of Relativity and the extension to
de Sitter space by Willem Sitter, there has been no refutation of this
work. Notification of the Illinois Attorney General is, therefore, in order to bring to a halt this very great and potenially tragic public endangerment
This is the question. Should we continue with this large a penalty of complete extinction for everyone for this research with greatest energies at the highest energy physics laboratory? Now again setting a new record for energies found on earth. Is this an existensial dilemma that only those who are concerned about humanity can solve? We need your help in this connection to please bring word of this public endangerment to the
Illinois Attorney General. We do, most respectfully, request a moratorium on
this highest-energy physics research until a refutation of this conceptual
framework is published in a peer-reviewed journal of highest-repute - or all must perish!

Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/~dixon/quantum_tunneling.pdf

All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Please contact Lisa Madigan, Illinois Attorney General and request that she take action in this public endangerment. A letter to her is included here:

EMERGENCY ALERT: FERMILAB HAS SHOWN 107.43E30 LUMINOSITY NOW REACHING 120.298E30 IN THE CDF FERMILAB AT SOME 2TeV A NEW WORLD RECORD, WHICH LEVEL OF OPERATION IS NOW BEING CONSISTENTLY MAINTAINED!

This research is being carried out to follow the thought of Richard P. Feynmnan among others to examine the partons of the subatomic realm of
physics. Alas, as you begin to discover the basic building block of matter you enter into the energies necessary to form a transition towards de Sitter space and release the force of a Type Ia Supernova!

15 June 2004

Lisa Madigan
Illinois Attorney General
500 South Second Street
Springfield, Ill 62706

Dear Attorney General,

May we request your interest in the onset of the very great energy increments now underway in June and July 2004 at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. There is a very great probability that this experimental apparatus will generate a supernova thus producing a very great and grave public endangerment to the personnel of the laboratory, their families, the United States of America and also the population of our planet.

A physicist, Dr. Walter Wagner,
http://www.msnbc.com/news/314049.asp?0m=T17N
has already brought suit against this forthcoming disaster in New York State and also in California. He states that the research is being brought forward without regard for the potential danger only to get the research underway. May we very respectfully call on the good offices of all concerned citizens of the world to halt this reckless plunge into the unknown on behalf of the families of all mankind.

In this connection, may we present an alternate hypothesis to that presented by Mike Perricone in the FermiNews (The Universe Lives On, June 19, 1998). This postulation may be termed the high-energy postulation wherein the equations show the attractive properties of the high-energy condition termed de Sitter space. It would, therefore, under this postulation be found that high-energy physics experimentation now coming on line at the Tevatron in our Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory would have a greater probability of releasing a supernova upon our planet and solar system by breaching the potential barrier towards the high-energy condition (de Sitter Space) than initiating a transition towards the low-energy condition. This hypothesis is based on the work of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter. Their work has proven uniformly correct in the realm of physics and would necessarily be found to be true in relativistic cosmology. (Blau, S. K., Guendelman, E. I. & Guth, A. H(1987) Physical Review D. Particle and Fields, 3, 1747-1766. To quote in this connection from Alan Guth who initiated inflationary cosmology, "one might guess that the gravitational repulsion of the false vacuum would push outward on the bubble wall, so, if the repulsion were strong enough. Not so however, say the equations of general relativity. The gravitational repulsion causes the false vacuum to swell, but the repulsion does not extend beyond the false vacuum. Objects outside the bubble wall are attracted towards the bubble, and the gravitational force on the bubble is inward." (Burns, J.O. (1990) Astronomy, 18, 28-37)

The possibility of initiating a transition towards the lower-energy condition from high-energy physics experimentation may still be present, yet this kind of transition would have far lower probability value according to the aforementioned equation.

May we very respectfully request that these transitions be modeled via computer simulation before the Tevatron at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory continues with any further experimentation at this time. To avoid any bias in understanding, publication of these results in a peer-reviewed journal of highest repute is most respectfully recommended to members of the staff at Fermilab.

It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3 , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation. This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a public endangerment as well.

This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere, the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger for their release.

With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed, and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to relativistic cosmology.

No harm will result from computer modelling of this alternate hypothesis for generation of Type Ia supernovae as a result of the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space. Yet clearly, vast harm may result form our continuing to plunge into the unknown without proper foresight concerning this possibility.

All of the children will thank you for your kind offices on their behalf. Please do what you can for them in this connection.

Your kind attention and consideration in this most salient matter are most gratefully appreciated.

All best wishes for you and your family.

With greatest respect,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology and Linguistics

Will we get to see the responses from the attorney general? Q

IN REPLY TO THIS LETTER

Please contact the Attorney General of Illinois and request a response.

Last edited by Paul W. Dixon : 04-10-05 at 07:06 AM.
 
Paul,

I'm a layman with absolutely no education in the field, and 99% of what you talk about is Greek to me...is there any way you or perhaps someone else could just give me a basic idea of what you are talking about?

What I've come to understand is this: In a lab somewhere, some scientists have created the conditions of space, in which they are attempting to create a supernova. Is that correct?
 
JDawg: Paul has been posting 5-10 times per month for a few years. As far as I can tell he ignores any replies, but I could be wrong since I have not read every post. There have been times when he made 10 or perhaps more consecutive posts because nobody else was posting, and he did not want the Thread to get pushed off the first page of the forum.

All of his posts are essentially the same. He claims that particle accelerators used by research physicists are creating conditions that will cause the sun to go Nova, destroying all life on Earth. He wants to start a campaign to stop the research.

He is a nut, or more properly: A monomaniac. He is fixated on his belief that he is attempting to warn us of an impending catastrophe, thus becoming the savior of the world if only we will pay attention and help stop the idiot scientists. Perhaps it is his idea of a practical joke. joking.

Support his cause if you believe that research physicists are too stupid to know or too crazy to care about the dangers he is alleging will happen.

BTW: Somebody here posted that Paul has his Phd in psychology, not physics. I suspect that this is correct, but who knows?

This Thread reminds me of those who claimed that the Thermonuclear Bomb experiments at Bikini Atoll would trigger a chain reaction causing the hydrogen in the oceans to fuse, annihilating all life on Earth.
 
Dino,

If it is true that Paul has a PhD in psychology rather than physics, than maybe this is just some grand experiment for him. Do you think it's possible someone would go to the lengths he has gone just to see how we'd react? I mean, it seems rather possible to me. Maybe he's trying to see how people react.

JD
 
Impressive credentials in the field of psychology, assuming that it is all valid. I tend to believe that the summary is essentially correct, but one can never be certain of information presented via the Internet.

I wonder what triggered his obsession with the particle accelerator experiments.
 
Dinosaur, Dr. Dixon has impressive credentials in several fields, including published
works in linguistics and mathematics. I checked his credentials out a year or two ago.
He is who he says he is. My reason for not being overly concerned with the high energy research taking place at particle accelerators is because of the specific theory
that Dr. Dixon is adhearing to, the Einstein de Sitter relativistic cosmology. In simple
layman's terms, the de Sitter universe is like another dimension in our universe, an
extremely energetic dimension. Dr. Dixon interprets the theory as reality, stating this
Einstein/de Sitter space has never been disproven and that Einstein has been correct
in his other theories. I question that conclusion myself. My understanding is that Dr.
Dixon believes the high energy experimentation does not cause OUR SUN to go nova,
but that the extremely high energies involved may cause a breach, a quantum tunnel,
between our dimension and this other high energy dimension theorized as de Sitter space. If the breach were to occur, then the energies from de Sitter space could intrude into OUR dimension, our universe. A type 1a supernova would be the result of
such a breach, not from our own sun, but from the release of energies from de Sitter
space. There are many theoretical models of the universe, but Dr. Dixon believes if
the Einstein/de Sitter model is the correct one, then we are in potential danger from
the high energy experimentation. He believes the experimentation should cease and be
replaced with computer modeling until we KNOW for certain no danger exists. I don't
want to misrepresent what Dr. Dixon believes, but this is as close to it as I am able
to determine with my limited knowledge of the very advanced theories he is concerned
about.
 
that makes some sence, but it's all theory, right? i'm also a noob to this, and while I don't think we can create a black hole or supernova yet with the accelerators, opening up a quantum tunnel would kinda suck, partcularly since there seems to be no exact science to predict it, and that if an unfathomable explosion DID take place, we probably wouldn't even feel it, we'd just be... gone. poof, good bye. So why bother worrying?

I find it funny that a man of Dr. Dixon's credentials comes off as a common scientists-will-destroy-existence doomsday prophet. I'd think he'd be of higher calibur than that, but that's just my opinion.
 
Anybody wonder if he might be right? I mean, has anyone looked into the numbers? (Just for the record: I have no way of discerning if any of that mumbo-jumbo is good math or not, but has anyone checked into it?)

Just a thought.
 
Paul W. Dixon said:
EARLY WARNING FROM BROOHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks for your kind actions in this tragic concern.

As was indicated in the the original statement,it is postulated that Type II
Supernovae have origin in de Sitter space. To state so indicates that under
this postulation the high-energy conditions at the galactic center create this transition towards de Sitter space more frequently thus engendering more frequent Supernovae.

Thus the processes of science involve the formulation of hypotheses which are then either supported or refuted through the processes of observation.
In the sense of this postulation, therefore, the high-energy physics experimentation at Fermilab is testing the hypothesis that in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed, sufficient energy will breach the potential barrier towards the de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova in Batavia, Illinois.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Good Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation

We don't live in an Einstein-de Sitter universe. An Einstein-de Sitter Universe is decelerating, while current observations show that the Universe is in an accelerated phase
I just have saved me from reading the whole thread, but some pieces here and there make me suspect that you're pulling the leg to all of us. That's not nice
 
This thread has been here for years now. Paul Dixon won't let it die. He really believes what he's saying and really believes he's doing what he is doing for the interest of safeguarding others. While I think he's off his rocker on the issue at hand, I won't argue with his genuine concern for his fellow man.
 
That's true. I emailed him yesterday, and recieved a prompt response today. He's seriously concerned about humanity, no matter how wacky he might be. Remember, the man has to be at least in his 70s, so perhaps he's just going a bit senile.

But honestly, I don't wish to diminish his genuine concern by mocking him. Just let him post his stuff, and if anybody buys into it, let them.
 
Back
Top