Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

Somebody always finds a reason to post here.

I still wonder how often Paul witl post if nobody else does.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks for your prompt support in this most tragic concern.

One of the first questions posed to me regarding the possibility of generation of Type Ia Supernova from high-energy physics experimentation was to the effect, if we should be capable of causing such a transition towards de Sitter space, then it should be possible, within the nearly infinite reaches of space and time, to see if others had made this same laboratory error. The extreme similarity of Type Ia Supernnova where they are used as standard candles in observational astronomy qualified them for this possibility. Also, they have been observed as having origin in objects of some .7 solar masses which is about half of the Chandrasekar limit of 1.2 solar masses necessary for the implosion necessary to trigger a supernova. (References for these observations are given earlier in this thread)

These concepts need to explored in the media if we are to halt this reckless plunge into the unknown!

All the children will thank you for your most prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.

During this hiatus at Fermilab, we may refer to New Physics Results from DO by Robert Kehoe from the DO collaboration. After the current upgrade now underway at Fermilab, the laboratory will enter into "Frontier Physics." In the charts for the Tevatron Luminosity, we may note the Collider Run llA Peak Luminosity figure where the chart extends from 04/01/01 to 09/01/03. During this period of some 873 days a fourfold increment in magnitude (x 10) from 0.00E+00 to 5.00E+31 in luminosity has been observed in the ring at Fermilab. Thus there has been an increment from 00E30 to 45.34E30 Luminosity during this time. An increment of approximately one order of magnitude every 218 days. Since these values are now at the greatest magnitude in the world's highest energy physics laboratory, with energy levels approximating those energies found at the point origin of the universe, i.e., the Big Bang, it may be anticipated that with each succeding 218 day period there will be the same increase in probability that a transition towards de Sitter Space will be formed - thus releasing the force of Supernova on our planet, our solar system and a host of nearby stars.

All of the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions during this time of supernova generation.

Please note: for the Fermilab Theoretical Astrophysical Seminars for Fall 2003 the de Sitter Days Workshop. This is scheduled for Monday 10th and Monday 17th, November 2003 at 2:30 PM for both days. The facility is Curia II on the 2nd floor of Wilson Hall, Southwest Corner with this room reserved for both days at Fermilab.

http://www-astro-theory.fnal.gov/Seminars/seminars.html

Should you have any questions concerning the forthcoming transition towards de Sitter space resulting in Type Ia Supernova generation, we are sure the staff at Fermilab will be most helpful in helping you to understand the forces resident in de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed as well as the potential barrier that has protected us so far from these energies. It must be understood, that these energies are not created at Fermilab but are only tapped into by the penetration of the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. The parameters for de Sitter space are given on page I of this thread which are cited from the most respected journals of science.

All the children will thank you for your most prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Supernova from Experimentation at Fermilab

Supernova from Experimentation at Fermilab

Many, many thanks to everyone for your most prompt actions in this tragic concern.

The restoration of operations is now underway at Fermilab. We note that the energetics at Fermilab is now at moderate levels neigboring 280 GeV. High potential voltage checks have been carried out to monitor the apparatus for hidden grounding and shorts in the apparatus. With the schedule at Fermilab touching on de Sitter conditions as seen in the preceeding post, it may be prayed that wisdom will have prevailed and our headlong rush towards doom has been forestalled. Penetration of the potential barrier towards de Sitter space will have more profound effects which include Supernova formation and the extinction of all life as we know it in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed in the postulations inherent in modern relativistic cosmology.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

Every Best Wish,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Talking to oneself isn't in itself indicative of being crazy... when you answer yourself and didn't send the signal to your mouth and vocals yourself is where you've gone nuts!
 
(gets a mental image of Paul Dixon in a basement building working with math like John Nash and mixing strange chemecles)

"Fools! I'll show them all!! They dare to laugh at me!?"
 
I think Paul should be made the official Sciforum mascot.

He is reliable, entertaining and somewhat harmless.

And his schtick never changes.
 
Paul is hoping that it happens, but the the physicists are able to warn us a few hours in advance.

Then he will die happy after posting I told you so!!!
 
True....

"Presentation to the international community of potential difficulty in high-energy physics experimentation in formation of a Einstein - Rosen white wormhole thus yielding a transition towards de Sitter space and/or breach through classically defined kinetic energy density towards de Sitter space."

Maybe we could ask him....
 
emarald,

Welcome to SciForums
WE LOVE YOU!!!(standard “hook you” cult phrase)

Do you know what an appeal to authority fallacy is?

Let me give you a example:
“Einstein denounce quantum mechanics, Einstein was one of the greatest minds in physics, therefore he must be right and quantum mechanics must be false.”

In reality though quantum mechanics has proven true and Einstein was wrong. Just because he was Einstein and was one of the greatest minds in physics does not mean what he says will be always correct.

Lets do another:

“Paul W. Dixon appears to be a PHD in physics with a very respectable record, he claims the world will end from high-energy particle experiments gone horribly wrong, Because of his record we must believe him!”

Again no one is infallible. This also does not take into account that many other scientist of equal records do not believe in what this Paul W. Dixon, it also does not take into account that high-energy particles of even higher energies then what this Paul W. Dixon claims will cause a supernova have been colliding with the earth on a hourly basis! You should always analyses something with your on eyes rather then believe in the one that claims or seems to have authority.
 
Neuromancer: The history of Einstein and Quantum Theory is more interesting than you might suspect.

In the first few years after the Planck paper on black body radiation, Einstein stated that Planck & other physicists did not understand the implications of Planck's results. He stated that they were assuming something analogous to oscillators being responsible for the quantum effects. Einstein claimed that the results implied that energy was a quantum phenomenon.

Almost without exception, the physicists of that era claimed that Einstein had literally lost his mind. A friend wrote a letter saying that he should be forgiven for his flight of fantasy in consideration of his other important work. Einstein wrote several papers, including the one on the photoelectric effect for which he got his Nobel prize. After his papers and various discussions, the world of physics acknowledged that he was correct.

BTW: He said the following about the controversy. (paraphrase, not an exact quote)
When the current controversy is resolved, the Swiss will proudly mention that I am a Swiss citizen and the Germans will brag about me being a German. Meanwhile, the Swiss call me a German and the Germans call me a Jew.
Click to expand...
Many consider Einstein more important than Planck in initiating quantum theory. After the theory became well established by others, Einstein disagreed with the probabilistic nature of it and what he called spooky action at a distance. He never really disagreed with the Uncertainty Principle and various other aspects of the theory.

It is interesting to note that neither Einstein nor anybody else ever received a Nobel prize for Relativity. It is my understanding that there was an unwritten rule that nobody could receive two Nobel prizes in one category. Einstein was deliberately given his prize for the photoelectric effect (a quantum phenomenon) rather than for Relativity in order to acknowledge his contributions to Quantum Theory and to apologize on behalf of those who called him crazy for advocating quantized energy. The committee felt that he would always be acknowledged as a genius for General Relativity, making a prize in that category superfluous, while they felt that he might not be given as much credit as he deserved for his contributions to Quantum theory.

Many remember his losing Quantum Theory debates with Bohr. Few remember that he was one of the founders of Quantum Theory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top