Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

Paul sez:

Having reviewed a brief description of the demographics for sciforums, it is clear that this is the ideal platfrom for the presentation of this thread

So, that means that Sciforums is THE place for crackpots and loons.

So far, there has been no refutation over these many years of the postulation that increased energetics in the ring at Fermilab will create a transition towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Supernova on our planet

That’s because no one is paying you any attention. Why waste time trying to refute a loon?

Indeed, an inquiry of anyone who is knowledgeable in relativistic cosmology…

… knows for a fact that you have no idea what you’re talking about.
 
Indeed, an inquiry of anyone who is knowledgeable in relativistic cosmology…
So wouldn't that mean that the people at Fermilab who are doing the experiments also agree with you, and therefore agree that they are going to kill themselves?

Originally posted by DeeCee
Think of it as a labour of love
This is some bastard child then.
 
Originally posted by Crisp
Hi Paul,

33 TeV = 33000 GeV = 33000*1000 MeV which equals approximately 33000 proton-masses of energy. So every collection of 33000 protons should trigger a supernova according to you ?

Sidenote: On average, every gram of material has something like 10^23 protons in it, a billion billion billion times more those 33000 protons.

Anyway, 33 TeV might sound like a lot of energy (and actually it is) but it is peanuts compared even to the energy of a nuclear bomb (and a supernova is just this tiny bit more powerful). The worst that could happen with a 33 TeV-beam is that the particles (going at a tremendous speed) smash into something at the wrong place, producing a rain of exotic particles of which 99,999% decays before they even reach the wall that seperates the project from the outside world. The remaining 0,001% is not really something to worry about since we're bombarded by those particles continiously from outer space anyway.

Conclusion: I wouldn't worry too much about accelerator experiments... The experiments you should worry about are the ones where people are trying to create black holes in laboratories.. Now it would suck if something goes wrong with these he ? (pun intended :)).

Bye!

Crisp
Click to expand...

I wonder just how much gas you can put in that box guys oh by the way i wouldn't unhook that from the power line or turn it off cause if you do the feild will collapse and boy wont that make an ugly mess. with just little ion i made and them will all that equipment and all those scientist tisk tisk seven men no matter how majestic even when standing in space still aren't gods just lying men. they can make or control a blackhole their just attempting to do something to get out of all that trouble thier in. nasa open the wormhole we're entering into the venturei. holy shit !nasa what the fuck are you guys doing up there? we've got problems houston are you in contact with kennedy? there is a second wormhole opening who the fuck is screwing around down cause this is serious shit. empra cestor sedo fallah
 
OH NO!!!!

GUYS, I've been navigating thru this thread for days....I'm really lost now, the first page looks just like the last!...and every page in between!...and it just goes on and on!.....
 
Originally posted by pyiarlit
I wonder just how much gas you can put in that box guys oh by the way i wouldn't unhook that from the power line or turn it off cause if you do the feild will collapse and boy wont that make an ugly mess. with just little ion i made and them will all that equipment and all those scientist tisk tisk seven men no matter how majestic even when standing in space still aren't gods just lying men. they can make or control a blackhole their just attempting to do something to get out of all that trouble thier in. nasa open the wormhole we're entering into the venturei. holy shit !nasa what the fuck are you guys doing up there? we've got problems houston are you in contact with kennedy? there is a second wormhole opening who the fuck is screwing around down cause this is serious shit. empra cestor sedo fallah
Click to expand...

:bugeye: Are you on speed? Because I'm damn sure you are. That's more incoherent than Paul's ramblings.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone intersted in this most tragic concern.

Please note: Where previously Fermilab's Tevatron was limited by storage insufficiency for anti-matter protons, the new Recycler with permanent magnets and other improvements now under construction provdes unlimited storage for antiprotons. In this way, the previous limitations of the Tevatron have been overcome allowing more continuous operations as well as greater collisional energetics. The likelihood of creating a transition towards de Sitter space is thus increased and hence the generation of Supernova at Fermilab is becoming more certain. It is more than evident in our current history what tragic disasters can be generated by modern tecnology, e.g. Chernobyl.

The luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note: Accelerator Luminosity Chart on the Fermilab Home Page) is 45.34E30. In scientific notation, this is is 45.30 x 10 to the 30th power interactions. With the beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then by addition of exponents (multiplication) the energy of the current work at Fermilab set at 45.34 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (45.34 E 41 eV). This is much great than the largest largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV) or as given above, 33 TeV (33 E 12 eV) Without publicity regarding this most critical danger, a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We have thus generated an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we shall all perish.

Please let me know if there are any other questions in this conection and we shall be most pleased to answer them.

All Best Wishes,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph. D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
you guys ever get that ass-chafe thing?
I hate that.....the worst is when your at the beach,
yes, ass chafage at the beach......oh, is this thread still here?
 
I keep hoping that nobody will post for 4-8 weeks after Paul posts. I would be interested in seeing if he will post several times if nobody else does.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to everyone for your most prompt actions in this tragic concern.

Since in some 28 years if presentation of these concepts to the leading members of the scientific community there has been no refutation of these most salient concerns, and yet the research as seen in the luminosity chart on the Fermilab Webpage shows vast increments in energetics over time, the central conception of our being caught in a web of historical causation would seem to be the best explanation of this ongoing most reckless plunge into the unknown. The next session of Run II at Fermilab is scheduled for October 19, 2003.

Any suggestions as to what is the next course of action that may be carried out at this time would be most welcome.

All the children will thank you for your most kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
I"m betting he has a web bot with a list of possible things to say which just keeps posting. It's an experiment to see if we'll keep replying. Damn! I just replied.


Well, given the likelyhood of this, its poorly structured data and arguement, I've decided to be more afraid of the ice cream man. He has like a 1/300000 chance of being a murderous lunitic, while this experiment has a 1/10000000000000 chance of distroying the universe. Until I get some better numbers to support the danger, the Ice Cream guy will be the subject of my nightmares for the time being.
 
I keep hoping that nobody else will post for 4-6 weeks to see if Paul will post 2-3 times in a row without getting a response.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for prompt actions in most tragic concern.

Since the point origin of the Universe, according to modern astronomical observations there has been a steady production of Type Ia Supernovae. The presence of these standard candles is postulated to have origin in the high-energy physics experimentation of sentient beings much like ourselves who then have a laboratory mischance producing a transition towards de Sitter space and thus releasing the force of a Supernova. In the sense of a Darwinian analysis, species must show a unified and cooperative understanding in order to prevent species extinction from this kind of cataclysm. Do we have enough collective intellectual and moral resources as well as general resolve to prevent the generation supernova via high-energy physics research? What will the judgement of history be for mankind in this regard?

In the sense of sciforums, to assert that we are safe and in no danger without a coherent scientific statement to support this position is only to assist those who would plunge us recklessly into the unknown.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Paul sez:

Since the point origin of the Universe, according to modern astronomical observations there has been a steady production of Type Ia Supernovae. The presence of these standard candles is postulated to have origin in the high-energy physics experimentation of sentient beings much like ourselves who then have a laboratory mischance producing a transition towards de Sitter space and thus releasing the force of a Supernova.

This has to be the most ridiculous statement you’ve made thus far. If throughout the 2+ years you’ve been addressing this thread to gain acceptance for your cause, you’ve now certainly lost it with this one statement.

You’ve really cocked it up this time, Paul.

It's time this thread was moved to Pseudoscience.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top