You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Subjectivity...can you understand it Objectively?
- Thread starter moementum7
- Start date
I see what your saying now. But I think that we could use a bit of clarification. That is up to you. I've been asking that now from you this whole thread.
clarification of what ? , exactly
tell me straight
don't doge
common tell me straight
“
really
so if the mind does so means that you can explain all energy/matter existence , interactions , actions , inately
with no study needed at all upon the above
common tnerb
oh...please
this will take a long while
subjectively we could think that the world and /or the Universe is created in the mind ”
It is
really
so if the mind does so means that you can explain all energy/matter existence , interactions , actions , inately
with no study needed at all upon the above
common tnerb
oh...please
this will take a long while
“
really
so if the mind does so means that you can explain all energy/matter existence , interactions , actions , inately
with no study needed at all upon the above
common tnerb
oh...please
this will take a long while
LoL. It wouldn't take but about .0001 seconds. I usually realize things afterwords. You don't know me at all.
Your bullshit, thinking, is now interrupting this thread. See the last post I made for this clarification.
I guess you're doing a FINE job!! amazing!
Describing how the universe works and things and somehow needing an objective clarification. Speaks heaps for you. I don't really trust something like that, worded so poorly. Please go back and read this thread before you post anymore bullshit.
LoL. It wouldn't take but about .0001 seconds. I usually realize things afterwords. You don't know me at all.
okay
lets go there then , forget the rest
lets move on
okay
lets go there then , forget the rest
lets move on
You're tellin me! :bugeye:
Please, go on.
You're tellin me! :bugeye:
Please, go on.
post #22 you wanted clarification
what I want to know is the clarification of what exactly ?
no games just tell me straight
clarification of what ?
“
why ?
Going on pure emotion, you stated that we should destroy subjectivity.
Prove me wrong.
Going on pure emotion, you stated that we should destroy subjectivity.
why would think this ?
and where is " destroy " anywhere in my posts on this thread ?
post #22 you wanted clarification
what I want to know is the clarification of what exactly ?
no games just tell me straight
clarification of what ?
Im sorry I don't tell anyone anything straight up and straight out.
I am not that way. Thus "the games."
The only thing I've asked of you this whole thread, is to remain in touch with the topic. And not to debate what I want to debate. Something intresting about me isn't it? It goes much deeper than you'd realize. So please, don't ask me to tell you anything straight up without giving me a reason to. In other words, what do I want clarified? Clearly it is just that I'd wish you to explain yourself. For what I have to go on now, is next to zealch, nada nothing..... You propose something and expect me to elaborate? On such a trife example of something. Sorry, doesn't work that way. The only thing I can do is ask you to expose your grand theory which you are so worked up about.
why would think this ?
and where is " destroy " anywhere in my posts on this thread ?
reword my post then if you give a rats ass
Originally Posted by thinking
post #22 you wanted clarification
what I want to know is the clarification of what exactly ?
no games just tell me straight
clarification of what ?
Im sorry I don't tell anyone anything straight up and straight out.
I am not that way. Thus "the games."
your being coy inotherwords
The only thing I've asked of you this whole thread, is to remain in touch with the topic.
and I have
you just have a problem with my approach
And not to debate what I want to debate. Something intresting about me isn't it?
yes and no
It goes much deeper than you'd realize. So please, don't ask me to tell you anything straight up without giving me a reason to. In other words, what do I want clarified? Clearly it is just that I'd wish you to explain yourself.
again I have
For what I have to go on now, is next to zealch, nada nothing..... You propose something and expect me to elaborate?
absolutely
On such a trife example of something.
trifle
hmmm... when someone can't answer the back
I win
Sorry, doesn't work that way. The only thing I can do is ask you to expose your grand theory which you are so worked up about.
I have a " grand theory " hmmm....
actually I don't
Please, use a different word?your being coy inotherwords
cool.yes and no
Your examples are easy to pass by I guess.trifle
hmmm... when someone can't answer the back
I win
I have a " grand theory " hmmm....
actually I don't
Ok. You don't. Great. Happy now?
Can you point out the post number of what you have said that is so important that you want me to respond to?
trifle
hmmm... when someone can't answer the back
I win
Your examples are easy to pass by I guess.
are they really though ?
objectively ?
Can you point out the post number of what you have said that is so important that you want me to respond to?
post # 22
Hah!
Now your on unfortunately.
Objectively speaking, yes.
why ?
Well all of what you say is true obviously (in the response I made it shows that is so....), so therefore, I haven't much to go on. Sure, you may be able to tie some of that in I guess. I was more particuarly concerned when you figured up how the mind formulates "ologies".
Also, its hard to reduce a constant to such a simple thing such as,
This is some interesting stuff.
I guess that, the mind either does or doesn't understand all the things in the universe... And if that is so then well, we're fucked.
IMO mind makes up everything.
Also, its hard to reduce a constant to such a simple thing such as,
thinking said:but that would imply that the mind fully understands all energy/matter actions , interactions between them , the mind doesn't
This is some interesting stuff.
I guess that, the mind either does or doesn't understand all the things in the universe... And if that is so then well, we're fucked.
IMO mind makes up everything.
Well all of what you say is true obviously (in the response I made it shows that is so....), so therefore, I haven't much to go on. Sure, you may be able to tie some of that in I guess. I was more particularly concerned when you figured up how the mind formulates "ologies".
" ologies " is the study of this or that ( I'm sure you know )
thats the thing here
Also, its hard to reduce a constant to such a simple thing such as,
[quote[Originally Posted by thinking
but that would imply that the mind fully understands all energy/matter actions , interactions between them , the mind doesn't
This is some interesting stuff.
thanks
I guess that, the mind either does or doesn't understand all the things in the universe... And if that is so then well, we're fucked.
no were not , just be patient
IMO mind makes up everything.
for the mind to make up everything means that the mind must understand everything in the Universe in the first place
the mind clearly doesn't
thinking
thanks
no were not , just be patient
for the mind to make up everything means that the mind must understand everything in the Universe in the first place
the mind clearly doesn't
thinking
cool.
provide 1 example.for the mind to make up everything means that the mind must understand everything in the Universe in the first place
the mind clearly doesn't