Stupid Sayings

StrangerInAStrangeLand said:
A broken clock is correct twice a day.


A clock is a device which measures time. There is more to being correct than chance coincidence.
And when people say a clock is fast or slow, it is probably not fast or slow but simply ahead or behind.

<>
Click to expand...

Clocks do not measure TIME

They indicate AGE from one arbitrary moment to another arbitrary moment

Clocks can be used to pick your arbitrary moment (s)

:)
 
StrangerInAStrangeLand said:
///
For the foreseeable future, I am going with time.

<>
Click to expand...

Read

The Invention of Time and Space by

Patrice F. Dassonville

*******
Chapter 3 digs deeper into these issues, which are related to the failure of
dialectics. It outlines the confusion between time and event, and describes the
semantic disorder concerning the duration of the ongoing (or present) time,
countless metaphors, aphorisms, sophisms, truisms, and so forth, including artifacts
(i.e., conceptions based on an idea, such as a clock or a clepsydra, used to evaluate
the duration between two events).

A clock is a device whose functioning is correlated with the configuration of the
Sun and Earth (Fig. 3.1). When used as clocks, the rhythms of nature do not
generate time. A clock does not produce time and it does not consume time; the time
displayed is subject to strict international conventions. The idea (concept) of
measuring changes (phenomena) is made concrete by the invention of the clock
(artifact): this is conception or design, i.e., the materialization of a concept through
the gnomon, sundial, clepsydra, and clock. Consider what Petronius (?–65 AD)
said: … a clock near which a “bucinator” (latin word for a “trumpet player”) warns
us of the flight of the days, and time gone by ([11]: XXV).
Days and hours cannot be measured; it is changes that are measured.

Chapter 3
The Failure of Dialectics
Abstract The failure of the dialectics of time and space has various origins:
• The confusion between time and event, e.g., the confusion between past time
and past event.
• The non-rigorous use of language, e.g., questions like the duration of present
time.
• The difficulty in understanding the difference between a phenomenon which
belongs to physical reality, and the corresponding mental construct or concept,
e.g., we measure changes instead of hours.
• The dichotomy between time and space, attempting to make time, space, and
spacetime, physical realities.
• The countless metaphors in which time has an active role (dynamics of time,
action of time, arrow of time), and in which space has a materiality.

The Invention of Time and Space by

Patrice F. Dassonville

****

The extracts do not do it justice

Read if you can

:)
 
StrangerInAStrangeLand said:
A broken clock is correct twice a day.


A clock is a device which measures time. There is more to being correct than chance coincidence.
And when people say a clock is fast or slow, it is probably not fast or slow but simply ahead or behind.

<>
Click to expand...
Same difference when you get docked for lateness.
 
Michael 345 said:
Don't get your knickers in a knot

Anyone here
Ever gone out
Obtained a knot
Put their knickers inside?

Or bought them pre packed inside a knot?

:)
Click to expand...
No but in Britain we speak of getting one's knickers in a twist rather than a knot. Some girls' knickers are sufficiently insubstantial that I can imagine them getting twisted, giving rise to an uncomfortable "dental floss" effect. I had always assumed this was the origin of the expression. Perhaps we need a woman's perspective on this, though.
 
I've heard either from British folks, but you've the experience.

Ever heard of a wedgie? The trick is to pull hard enough so they don't rip away, but still leave friction burns. Or to flip the recipient off his feet.

I can't imagine doing that to a woman. There are easier ways...
 
Michael 345 said:
Stupid sayings right?

God is

Not well known and if not on any list of stupid sayings it should be added

:)
Click to expand...
///
IF somehow I became convinced some god exists, that saying would yet be utterly frigging stupid.
"I did not say god exists. I said god is."

<>
 
Last edited:
Dr_Toad said:
I've heard either from British folks, but you've the experience.

Ever heard of a wedgie? The trick is to pull hard enough so they don't rip away, but still leave friction burns. Or to flip the recipient off his feet.

I can't imagine doing that to a woman. There are easier ways...
Click to expand...
To those of us Brits of a certain age, "wedgie" means only one thing: our one time far left nutcase Labour minister, Anthony Wedgewood-Benn.
So I had to look this up. Wiki has pictures of it being done to both sexes. A Melvin sounds painful. As for a Minerva, well maybe that is too.

In our family we used to use the expression "starsky" to denote anything that painfully compressed the gonads, after a story that in the TV series Starsky and Hutch the actor ruptured a testicle leaping over a car, due to his tight 70s trousers. :D

Later, the term was redeployed, Cockney slang style, to mean a small city flat, rented for the purpose of carrying on an illicit affair. As in a f***- hutch.
 
i asked everyone and no body said anything

statistically this is highly improbable for 2 reasons
1 it would be impossible to ask everyone
2 if you managed to ask everyone at least 1 person would have said something even if unrelated.
 
RainbowSingularity said:
i asked everyone and no body said anything

statistically this is highly improbable for 2 reasons
1 it would be impossible to ask everyone
2 if you managed to ask everyone at least 1 person would have said something even if unrelated.
Click to expand...
///
1 of the very many things people say using everybody or everywhere or always inappropriately.

<>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top