deleted responseThe central government is basically many different governments for each society: it's centralized only to ensure stability overall and for economic purposes.
So there could be liberal societies in there. Can my society, where there is a lot of freedom, freedom from many traditions you uphold, prevent your society from destroying the environment?The central government is basically many different governments for each society: it's centralized only to ensure stability overall and for economic purposes.
So there could be liberal societies in there. Can my society, where there is a lot of freedom, freedom from many traditions you uphold, prevent your society from destroying the environment?
I hate to tell you this but radiation levels went up in my home state in the US after Chernobyl. It was pretty insignificant. In Sweden however....What do you mean? It would not affect you seeing as you wouldn't be there.
By preventing the societies from seperating into seperate states, and enforcing a single overarching banner.
Then we would have diplomacy to get it sorted out in a civil manner, under the overarching centralized government.
If necessaryUsing force?
So your model is dependent on imagining that people will suddenly be civil.
Seems like a lot of models will work if we assume this.
They would be under an enforced overarching governmental banner.
i dont like the idea, for the simple fact that its used to track you. its just one more way your life is documented, i like privacy personaly. but its hard to argue against it, if your in a position where someone could be watching you then a camera is doing the same thing. a camera doesnt actually do anything to stop a crime. and if the camera is in a high crime area, people arent going to stop stealing or dealing drugs, they will just stand out of view of the camera. so do you like the idea of being researched without knowing? someone doing a marketing research project with you as the subject. tracking you through the city, where you shop, check your cards see howmuch you buy. who you talk to.
The cameras seem like a good idea, but I don't trust the government to use them correctly and not abuse them. The government doesn't seem to really care about crime, and I know they would like to be able to monitor suspected "terrorists" or whatever this way.
they are not a good idea, EVEN WHEN A CRIME IS CAUGHT ON THEM, IT DOESNT MEAN THAT THE CRIMINALS WILL BE FOUND GUILTY LIKE MY DAUGHTER FOUND OUT
The point is that the claims of safety are in question. Something from the plus column is put into question. We are sold this encroachment saying it will increase safety.Well, thats a problem with the justice system, not the cameras.
The point is that the claims of safety are in question. Something from the plus column is put into question. We are sold this encroachment saying it will increase safety.
If necessary.
Well, thats a problem with the justice system, not the cameras.
they certainly occur to the makers of these devices and the makers of prisons. The US now has enormous highly profitable security industries and a huge % of the population in jailThat is typical of any kind of electronic "safety". People think burglar alarms protect them from burglars, but really the alarms do nothing other than make noise. The burglar can still wander into the house and shoot people.
I do not know why these types of things don't occur to some people.