The greater good of society, to ensure stability. There will, of course, still be certain freedoms, but ultimately the goal is to create an environment in which everyone can be happy, comfortable, and safe.
No, you can't. You need civilized rules.
Street cameras
- Thread starter Norsefire
- Start date
No, you can't. You need civilized rules.
What happens if some individuals can not 'be happy, comfortable, and safe' in a society with the restrictions you propose? Let me guess... Eliminate and / or contain, right?
For instance, I am not happy in your 'brave new world'. What will you do?
Every individual can be. That's the beauty of it.
Nothing, except encourage you to move to where you are happy.:shrug:
According to whom? What is your definition of 'society'?
Don't be stupid, norsefire. That was the question. What if some individuals can't be? I gave myself as an example. Now what?
Move where? Are there parts of the world you do not envision incorporating into your enlightened society? Parts reserved for us savages? Like the American Indian reservations, perhaps?
The complete organism of all Humans living and interacting together
Then such a government would ask you why, you'd answer, and they'd adapt to you, or you could leave.
Actually I was thinking more along the lines of different societies for different types of people.
It'd all be under one central government, and they'd still interact of course, but generally you live with people whom you are comfortable and safe with. Why not?
You do enjoy contradicting yourself, don't you?
Last edited:
And go where? It's all one central government, according to you, so where would I go?
How so?
It'd be one central government, but it's main job would be ensuring the regulation and stability and economic welfare of seperate societies. i.e, this central government governs each society differently based on the way the people want it
Therefore you'd go to where you are comfortable and welcome
No way. you're not that obtuse and ignorant. You know exactly how you are contradicting yourself...
No, actually, I don't.
What? If 'each society' is regulated differently, where does the concept of central government lie? You mean a republic or confederacy, like the US?
The central government is basically many different governments for each society: it's centralized only to ensure stability overall and for economic purposes.
How will it accomplish this?
By ensuring that each society is somehow connected and united ultimately under one banner, to protect against separation into seperate states. This can help ensure stability.
How?
By preventing the societies from seperating into seperate states, and enforcing a single overarching banner.