Star triangle paradox

To answer your questions:
smelling cookies is a perception of them, as is seeing them.
Click to expand...

I missed that due to it being in the middle.

Do you think that just smelling them is an indication far greater than seeing them that the cookies may actually be something else?

Does this denote what can easiyl be deemed as levels? At what point does perception reach the level of reality. Reality is not perception.
 
John99 said:
Well then you object ot asking questions to get to the explanation. Thing is...here there are many questions to be asked so it is natural to ask questions...thing is when someone askes me a question it has the stipulation that i will be banned. Either for trolling and if i dont answer, answering the question or not answering the question.

I answered how many questions only to have my responses ignored.

I really think 2 posts, at least, were entirely overlooked.

My last post of significance will be revised to include the human is naked.
Click to expand...

John, either you ARE trolling or else you're the MOST confused human I've ever come across. :shrug: I say that because you agreed that light travels at a fixed speed - yet you also claim that it takes NO time for it to travel a fixed distance!!!! Anyone with two working brain cells knows those two conditions contradict themselves.:bugeye:

So which is it John? You can't tell your donkey from a mine shaft - or you are just trolling? There is no third choice.
 
John99 said:
Do you think that just smelling them is an indication far greater than seeing them that the cookies may actually be something else?
Click to expand...
Why should it be "far greater"? Greater in what way? A perception is a perception. Granted humans place more reliance on sight than smell, but, for example, dogs don't.

Does this denote what can easiyl be deemed as levels?
Click to expand...
No.

At what point does perception reach the level of reality. Reality is not perception.
Click to expand...
So what?
And you're waffling away from providing any explanation. Again.
 
Read-Only said:
John, either you ARE trolling or else you're the MOST confused human I've ever come across. :shrug: I say that because you agreed that light travels at a fixed speed - yet you also claim that it takes NO time for it to travel a fixed distance!!!! Anyone with two working brain cells knows those two conditions contradict themselves.:bugeye:

So which is it John? You can't tell your donkey from a mine shaft - or you are just trolling? There is no third choice.
Click to expand...

There may be more to it. See post 184 for the details. You really need to read the thread and not just see what you want to see. Not that i am claiming one part is wrong but i am adding observations that are being completely ignored.
 
John99 said:
There may be more to it.
Click to expand...
What more could there be? Is this yet another avoidance of providing an actual reply?

See post 184 for the details.
Click to expand...
Post 184 provided no details (and made a false claim).

Not that i am claiming one part is wrong but i am adding observations that are being completely ignored.
Click to expand...
No, you're making stuff up.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Why should it be "far greater"? Greater in what way? A perception is a perception. Granted humans place more reliance on sight than smell, but, for example, dogs don't.
Click to expand...

Not merely reliance. These are natural boundaries, smell has a boundary but i see the cookies with no boundaries.
 
I just think to say it is perception invokes more of the question of interpretation\how it is interpeted by the brain when 99.999999% percent of people, in terms of simle identification, will intepret the cookies one way.
 
Last edited:
John99 said:
Not merely reliance. These are natural boundaries, smell has a boundary but i see the cookies with no boundaries.
Click to expand...
Wrong. What "boundaries"?

John99 said:
I just think to say it is perception invokes more of the question of interpetation when 99.999999% percent of people will intepret the cookies one way. I mean only in indentification.
Click to expand...
Word salad. Meaningless.

More avoidance.
 
John99 said:
Levels of Perception.
Click to expand...
Still using your own made-up terminology without actually explaining what it means?

We could not dtermine that the cookies were real with 100% certainty just by looking at them.
Click to expand...
Hence there's a "boundary" on vision. Which is contrary to your earlier claim.
 
“
Originally Posted by John99
Obviously vision has boundaries.
”

“
Originally Posted by John99
but i see the cookies with no boundaries.
”

I meant ocular baoundaries.
 
John99 said:
With the qualifier: that i never inferred interpretation by the brain.
Click to expand...
Irrelevant. Sight is interpreted in the brain. And the light does NOT arrive in real time. (As you have agreed).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top