Star triangle paradox

James R said:
John99:
Please explain for me the physical process by which you see a door that is 3 metres away from you.

Why is it important to have light? What role does light play in your seeing the door?

Tell me how the image of the door is formed in your eyes. How do your eyes know there is a door 3 metres away?
Click to expand...

I am fairly certain I agree with anything a google search turns up. May be an area of dispute but these are not specific questions.

Make sure you explain in detail, because I'm going to assume you're trolling if you don't explain yourself.
Click to expand...

How am i trolling if i am answering questions?
 
John99 said:
I am fairly certain I agree with anything a google search turns up. May be an area of dispute but these are not specific questions.
Click to expand...

You do not agree with the standard scientific view that is verified by all available evidence and which can be found with any brief google search.

Therefore, you will explain your position, or retract it.

You have another 24 hours or you will be banned for trolling.
 
John99 said:
It means that if you smell cookies is it perception telling you there are cookies near?

If you see cookies is it perception indicating there are cookies?

No need for abstract interpretations here.
Click to expand...
Still haven't explained what you mean by "rises above the level of perception".
But I suppose it won't matter since your ban is imminent. All you've done is avoid giving any relevant, or rational, answer to "support" your ridiculous contention.
'bye.
 
James R said:
You do not agree with the standard scientific view that is verified by all available evidence and which can be found with any brief google search.
.
Click to expand...

You asked me how the human eye sees, i responded by telling you that my view does not differ from mainstream.

J asked:

1) Please explain for me the physical process by which you see a door that is 3 metres away from you.

2) Why is it important to have light? What role does light play in your seeing the door?

3) Tell me how the image of the door is formed in your eyes. How do your eyes know there is a door 3 metres away?

4) Make sure you explain in detail, because I'm going to assume you're trolling if you don't explain yourself.
Click to expand...

Number 1: I already explained this in detail. Apparently you did not like the explanation.

Number 2-3: I commented that my understanding coincides with google search.

Number 4: Cannot really give any more detail but you didnt comment to my previous explanation. Did i miss something or did you not see the post with the explanation.

Ask me some new questions.
 
James, let me ask you a question, of which i view as substantial.

Would your explanation of light bouncing from the door is only way to see it stay exctly the same if the door was a human?

* Be sure to view this with an open mind and do not interject any preconceived notions regarding the object. Just what is on the surface and merely concerned with how your understanding can very well be deficient.
 
John99 said:
Did you answer the question, Sire?
Click to expand...
You didn't answer mine...

Ooh, this is good:
Would your explanation of light bouncing from the door is only way to see it stay exctly the same if the door was a human?
Click to expand...
Yes. Vision works the same for seeing humans as it does for seeing doors.

* Be sure to view this with an open mind and do not interject any preconceived notions regarding the object. Just what is on the surface and merely concerned with how your understanding can very well be deficient.
Click to expand...
Nope: it's your "understanding" that's deficient.
 
Of course it is totally acceptable to answer a question with a question in a debate if the questions are asked in furtherance of the origianl quaestion.
 
John99 said:
Of course it is totally acceptable to answer a question with a question in a debate if the questions are asked in furtherance of the origianl quaestion.
Click to expand...
Not when you later claim that that question was an actual explanation.

To answer your questions:
smelling cookies is a perception of them, as is seeing them.

Your turn.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Not when you later claim that that question was an actual explanation.

To answer your questions:
smelling cookies is a perception of them, as is seeing them.

Your turn.
Click to expand...

Well then you object ot asking questions to get to the explanation. Thing is...here there are many questions to be asked so it is natural to ask questions...thing is when someone askes me a question it has the stipulation that i will be banned. Either for trolling and if i dont answer, answering the question or not answering the question.

I answered how many questions only to have my responses ignored.

I really think 2 posts, at least, were entirely overlooked.

My last post of significance will be revised to include the human is naked.
 
John99 said:
thing is when someone askes me a question it has the stipulation that i will be banned.
Click to expand...
No: the ban comes from contradicting known facts and failing to support your contentions. All you've done is waffle and evade while consistently not providing an explanation.

I answered how many questions only to have my responses ignored.
I really think 2 posts, at least, were entirely overlooked.
Click to expand...
because you have evaded, avoided and obfuscated. Including directly contradicting yourself.

My last post of significance will be revised to include the human is naked.
Click to expand...
Naked or clothed: viewing a human is the same as viewing a door. All you're doing (again) is obfuscating.

Oh, ps, I think you misused the word "significance" in that sentence. I haven't seen ANY posts from you that have significance.
 
John99 said:
I cannot retract.
Click to expand...
And nor can you provide any rational explanation.
'bye.
Maybe you could spend some of your ban time learning science and how reality works. It would be an improvement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top