I don't care what you believe and I'm certainly not going to hunt down all the evidence out there for you because you are too lazy to look into it yourself. You're initial point was only that the existence of the paranormal entailed the existence of God. You have yet to establish why that is necessarily so. At most you have only offered speculative what-ifs along the line of "Since we don't know what paranormal entities are, then they must be angels and demons" or some such BS. But you haven't provided any logic supporting such a conclusion. Still waiting...
don't misrepresent me. I never said these things, if they exist, must be angels or demons, rather I said that, if the ghosts exist, the demons and angels people have been talking about may be these things, I.e actual manifestations of something that people have called ghosts but have also called angels and demons. I have nothing to say about what these things MUST be, or must not be. That is your job.
The recordings are what they are. They are typical of evps people capture of voices all over the world in that they are sounds and voices of people who not present at the time of the recording. If you're really serious about exploring evps, type in "best evps" under Youtube and start listening. There you will definitely hear voices clear enough to understand.
I just don't understand why these things seem to occur in such a way as to always have some questionable elements. If there are thousands of them, why doesn't one ever show up on a national geographic photographers film, or a tv show's unused takes? Why is there noise all over the insane asylum stuff? If these things happen all the time, why don't they happen one time in a way it would be more difficult to disbelieve?
Photos? Video? Audio? Come on..It shouldn't be that hard to photograph God walking down the street.
maybe god doesn't come here and he sends angels that appear to be ghosts to do his work, and those angels/ghosts just never seem to come out on a definitive piece of film or audio. You are talking about people that have seen all kinds of varying things, many saw just vaguely shaped lights or darknesses - I have a hard time with people who insist that some vague shape was a ghost, or an angel, or an alien, or whatever. I think the evidence, if there is any, is vague enough that they could literally be any of those things or that there is an explanation that is more in line with current scientific ideas.
As a general rule, I don't take seriously accounts of beings seen from one's bed while paralyzed. This sounds exactly like a paralysis dream, a common experience for many especially after eating too close to bedtime. I once saw my bedroom door closing in a half dreaming state. When I woke up the door was still open. Dreams can do amazing things to the half asleep mind.
but you are saying these dead people exist, so why then wouldn't they go to some seance? Other people at mazulus house saw something similar , according to his story. You believe in ghosts but his ghost is impossible. ??
I have yet to hear how the paranormal is proof of God. Perhaps we can get back to that argument now?
I absolutely did not and would not say that. I am really saying that people will call things what they want to - your stance on this subject shows that quite well. I am also saying that these things seem too vague to pin down to me, even if they are more than hoaxes etc. Also, I am saying that these manifestations, whether attributed religious or ghostly attributes, are all suspicious, i.e. that these ghost stories are as suspicious as spontaneous healing stories, that supposedly have physical evidence, so I don't see why you differentiate between those accounts and this stuff. Logically, not ideologically, that is.
