Pronatalist
Registered Senior Member
How can humans be "invasive" if we belong here? This is OUR world, or more accurately, God's world.
Nah.... we inherit it from our children
That doesn't sound quite right. What is that? The Indian outlook upon the world?
We pass down what we have, to future generations. But I do not consider myself "better" than my children, so I welcome them to naturally come to life, as they can. I believe in holding the door to life open for them.
But if we supposedly do inherit the world from our children, if it is their world more than ours, then isn't that all the more reason why humans should multiply naturally, not trying to impede the natural flow of human life? Surely our children like coming alive and being welcome to be born?
And in a way, the world is more the world of future generations than ours, if the future generations are to be even more populous. For then there are all the more people to be concerned about, inhabiting the world in the future. Far more "votes" for the human race to be more numerous, not less. The future generations would have the "weight of numbers" arguing naturally for their more populous side. Especially as at the rate we are going, eventually projecting probably far out beyond the Biblical endtimes in the assumption that "current rates" continue on without such a "wrap-up" anytime soon, we would reach the point of having the majority of people who have ever lived, still being alive, as the human population doubling time is still shorter than the average lifespan. I do rather think that so many people so benefitting from being alive, would not want to be any less numerous then, and still much insist upon being free to enjoy having their children. I see it as curious and beautiful to consider that the living might someday much outnumber the cummulative total dead.