Well, duh!
You're missing the point, but that's okay. After all, we do the same thing with bongs up here. However, the idea that these laws exist? The state argued that it has legitimate reasons for "discouraging prurient interests in autonomous sex and the pursuit of sexual gratification unrelated to procreation" (see topic post).
That's right: they want to regulate your orgasms in Texas.
That's what everyone is laughing about, Sprout. Well, that and the incest/bigamy panic. Seriously, why is the state worried about it? If Texans can openly buy dildos instead of "personal massage devices" are they really going to start banging their siblings?
Although, I am curious: How would you market a molded-plastic penis (non-vibrating)? As a party decoration? And what about the pocket ... uh ... vaginas?
And then there's the fact that the state is going to appeal the decision ....
Angrybellsprout said:
You're missing the point, but that's okay. After all, we do the same thing with bongs up here. However, the idea that these laws exist? The state argued that it has legitimate reasons for "discouraging prurient interests in autonomous sex and the pursuit of sexual gratification unrelated to procreation" (see topic post).
That's right: they want to regulate your orgasms in Texas.
That's what everyone is laughing about, Sprout. Well, that and the incest/bigamy panic. Seriously, why is the state worried about it? If Texans can openly buy dildos instead of "personal massage devices" are they really going to start banging their siblings?
Although, I am curious: How would you market a molded-plastic penis (non-vibrating)? As a party decoration? And what about the pocket ... uh ... vaginas?
And then there's the fact that the state is going to appeal the decision ....
