Nup, just proved in my previous post that you were talking out of your arse and telling lies by claiming to have references.The claim is safe .
Nup, just proved in my previous post that you were talking out of your arse and telling lies by claiming to have references.The claim is safe .
Again, unsupported.
So we'll ignore that too.
Since you are devoid of any evidence as per all your crazy claims, here is an up to date paper........
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._Memory_of_Water_Med_Sci_Hypotheses_2017_41-6
The Controversy Over the “Memory of Water”
- January 2017
For a very long time, the idea of the “memory of water” tantalized not only the homeopathic community, but
also serious scientists and researchers like Luc Antoine Montagnier, a recipient of the Nobel Prize.
This misconception originated from an experiment conducted by the famous allergologist, Dr. Jacques Benveniste.
He claimed to have shown in an in vitro experiment that highly dilute potencies of bee poison (apis mellifi-
ca), even beyond the Avogadro number, are capable of producing structural changes in living organisms in the
same way that the real poison from the bee can bring these changes about, being the actual degranulation of
basophils. His paper was published in Nature under an obligation to prove his findings in front of a scientific
committee in his own laboratory. Benveniste could not reproduce the results that his team was claiming.
When a similar experiment was repeated by a different group of scientists and filmed by the BBC, it also failed.
While it was obvious that the experiment was proved to be false, the scientific community concluded, by an
extension of logic, that since the experiment was false, therefore homeopathy must also be a false system of
therapy.
Despite the fact that the experiment was repeatedly invalidated, some scientists, especially in the homeopath-
ic community, continued to believe that Benveniste’s findings were true.
In this way, the scientific community remains in confusion as to whether: a) water has memory, or b) homeop-
athy is or is not a valid system of therapy.
Since I have been an eye-witness of these events from their very beginnings, I am giving an account of the real
story for both the homeopathic community and the sceptic
As is yours.This Attitude is no surprise .
... bullshit.Memory of water is...
To be Clear people . Memory of water is about the physics , the enviroment , the capturing of the movement in Water . Vibration .
As is yours.
Someone else who wants to make claims without support, yet expects them to be accepted without question.
... bullshit.
And yet you're the one making claims you won't, or can't, support.Nah , your just being Daft .
And yet you're the one making claims you won't, or can't, support.
I have given you two papers, and yet you still are playing hard to get.Investigate Water , google , what ever , just investigate . Take a month , 2wks , 1wk . What did you find ?
Again: YOU made the claim.Investigate Water , google , what ever , just investigate . Take a month , 2wks , 1wk . What did you find ?
So still no support?I told you to go to , youtube . I'm sure many have , have you not the many ?
So still no support?
And yet you can't produce it.Oh its there .
U tube?? That's where you got your atomic war between aliens on Mars from river?I told you to go to , youtube . I'm sure many have , have you not the many ?
But science has shown homeopathic crap is false, it is just an expensive placebo. The homeopathic community is comprised of charlatans and fools.Although I am not discussing about efficacy from small dose in topic because it is already well observed by homeooathic community since long back.
Things can change in science with new understandings. Studies did not shown nil outcome but shown less outcómes than modern medicines. Nil molecular presence was main issue for getting odd preceptions. Moreover there is also a new understsnding about wrong type of dilutions used which mostly should had deviated for getting right outcomes in studies.But science has shown homeopathic crap is false, it is just an expensive placebo. The homeopathic community is comprised of charlatans and fools.
Of course. But the chance of magic becoming science is not likely.Things can change in science with new understandings.
Wrong, homeopathy has been shown to do nothing.Studies did not shown nil outcome but shown less outcómes than modern medicines.
Nope, homeopathy is crap.Nil molecular presence was main issue for getting odd preceptions. Moreover there is also a new understsnding about wrong type of dilutions used which mostly should had deviated for getting right outcomes in studies.