Vega said:15 pages did I something???
Yes you did, the renowned author Ahmed Osman was here. He and Sam went at it.
Vega said:15 pages did I something???
The Devil Inside said:sam, you have been beset by trolls.
take the tact i use, and interact only with those that are interested in engaging and intelligent debate, rather than those that have no wish to learn.
The Devil Inside said:sam, you have been beset by trolls.
take the tact i use, and interact only with those that are interested in engaging and intelligent debate, rather than those that have no wish to learn.
samcdkey said:The Kufic script was developed especially for religious purposes:
Broadly speaking, there were two distinct scripts in the early centuries of Islam: cursive script and Kufic script. For everyday purposes a cursive script was employed: typical examples are to be seen in the Arabic papyri from Egypt. Rapidly executed, the script does not appear to have been subject to formal and rigorous rules, and not all the surviving examples are the work of professional scribes. Kufic script, however, seems to have been developed for religious and official purposes. The term Kufic means "the script of Kufah," an Islamic city founded in Mesopotamia (modern day Iraq) in AD 638, but the actual connection between the city and the script is not clear. Kufic is a more or less square and angular script characterized by its heavy, bold, and lapidary style. Its letters are generally thick, squat, and unslanted, and it was particularly suitable for writing on stone or metal, for painting or carving inscriptions on the walls of mosques, and for lettering on coins. Professional copyists employed a particular form of Kufic for reproducing the earliest copies of the Quran that have survived. These are written on parchment and date from the 8th to the 10th century. They are mostly of an oblong as opposed to codex format. The writing is frequently large, especially in the early examples, so that there may be as few as three lines to a single page. The script can hardly be described as stiff and angular; rather, the pace is majestic and measured. With the high development of Arabic calligraphy, Kufic writing became an exceptionally beautiful script. From it, there were derived a number of other styles, chiefly medieval, in North and Central Africa, Spain, and northern Arabia.
Kufic went out of general use about the 11th century, although it continued to be used as a decorative element contrasting with those scripts that superseded it. About AD 1000 a new script was established and came to be used for copying the Quran. This is the so-called naskhi script, which has remained perhaps the most popular script in the Arab world. It is a cursive script based on certain laws governing the proportions between the letters. The two names associated with its development are Ibn Muqlah and Ibn al-Bawwab, both of whom lived and worked in Mesopotamia. Naskhi was always employed chiefly for writing on papyrus. In time, it evolved into innumerable styles and varieties, including the ta'liq, the riqa', the diwani, and the thuluth, and became the parent of the modern Arabic writing.
Vega said:I understand the historical attributes of the scripting language but how does that sufficently authenticate the quranic interpretations as credibile and precise towards its followers?
There are several schools of Qur'anic recitation, all of which are permissible pronunciations of the Uthmanic rasm. Today, ten canonical and at least four uncanonical recitations of the Qur'an exist. For a recitation to be canonical it must conform to three conditions:
1. It must match the rasm, letter for letter.
2. It must conform with the syntactic rules of the Arabic language.
3. It must have a continuous isnad to Prophet Muhammad through tawatur, meaning that it has to be related by a large group of people to another down the isnad chain.
Ibn Mujahid documented seven such recitations and Ibn Al-Jazri added three. They are:
1. Nafi of Madina (169/785), transmitted by Warsh and Qaloon
2. Ibn Kathir of Makka (120/737), transmitted by Al-Bazzi and Qonbul
3. Ibn Amer of Damascus (118/736), transmitted by Hisham and Ibn Zakwan
4. Abu Amr of Basra (148/770), transmitted by Al-Duri and Al-Soosi
5. Asim of Kufa (127/744), transmitted by Sho`bah and Hafs
6. Hamza of Kufa (156/772), transmitted by Khalaf and Khallad
7. Al-Kisa'i of Kufa (189/804), transmitted by Abul-Harith and Al-Duri
8. Abu-Jafar of Madina, transmitted by Ibn Wardan and Ibn Jammaz
9. Yaqoob of Yemen, transmitted by Ruways and Rawh
10. Khalaf of Kufa, transmitted by Ishaaq and Idris
These recitations differ in the vocalization (tashkil) of a few words, which in turn gives a complementary meaning to the word in question according to the rules of Arabic grammar. For example, the vocalization of a verb can change its active and passive voice. It can also change its stem formation, implying intensity for example. Vowels may be elongated or shortened, and glottal stops (hamzas) may be added or dropped, according to the respective rules of the particular recitation. For example, the name of archangel Gabriel is pronounced differently in different recitations: Jibrīl, Jabrīl, Jibra'īl, and Jibra'il. The name "Qur'an" is pronounced without the glottal stop (as "Qurān") in one recitation, and prophet Abraham's name is pronounced Ibrāhām in another.
The more widely used narrations are those of Hafs , Warsh, Qaloon and Al-Duri according to Abu `Amr Muslims firmly believe that all canonical recitations were recited by the Prophet himself, citing the respective isnad chain of narration, and accept them as valid for worshipping and as a reference for rules of Sharia. The uncanonical recitations are called "explanatory" for their role in giving a different perspective for a given verse or ayah. Today several dozen persons hold the title "Memorizer of the Ten Recitations," considered to be the ultimate honour in the sciences of Qur'an.
not elitist, observant over the years of certain personalities on this forum.John99 said:Elitist?
Your posts are numbingly intelligent.
All hail Devil Inside.
Vega said:according to you it's an interpretation problem just like your religon as a whole!
http://i-cias.com/e.o/sharia.htmSharia is often referred to as Islamic law, but this is wrong, as only a small part is irrefutably based upon the core Islamic text, the Koran. A correct designation is "Muslim Law" (i.e. the law system of the Muslims), or "Islam-inspired", "Islam-derived," or even "the law system of Muslims."
This is well known to most Muslims, yet Sharia is always referred to as "based upon the Koran", hence it is the "will of God."
Fiqh is the science of Sharia, and is sometimes used as synonymous with it. Fiqh is collected in a number of books which are studied by students and used by the ulama. These books are studied and interpreted according to rules found in school, madhhab, the student or learned man belongs to. But most people belonging to the ulama cannot interpret freely the fiqh- books, this is a right reserved for the mufti, who can issue fatwas, 'legal opinions'.
A variety of restraints, political, moral, economic and cultural, pose challenges to the responsiveness and efficacy of Islamic law in the lives of the Muslims worldwide. At the same time they provide opportunities for the Muslim jurists to offer new perspectives on the role and contribution of Islamic law to the advancement of diversified international law, especially with respect to universal ethics and human rights. In the following areas we had some serious discussion and debate about Islamic criminal law within the current international human rights order.
Vega said:so whats gonna become of sharia law in the future?
Vega said:how the hell did you switch threads like that?
ah your very own thread,..gives you a sense of pride and authority doesn't it!samcdkey said:I figured we derailed that one enough!
If you wanna ask me questions just use this thread.
I like seeing my name in print!
why sharia?
yeah, i had to check out this thread and see for myself.John99 said:Yes you did, the renowned author Ahmed Osman was here. He and Sam went at it.
Vega said:but anyway back to the topic of discussion..why sharia? why not use the country's justice system instead?
leopold99 said:yeah, i had to check out this thread and see for myself.
there's only one thing i have to say to you ahmed assman, you better leave sam alone or this whole god damn foruim will be on your ass. got it?
blessed be the internet where moderate muslims can speak the truth without pricks like assman murdering them.