Remote-sense: Intelligent Earth Modification

Electric_Ashalar said:
ylooshi.
Your problem(like SW's) is personality.
I'm not a member here to win a popularity contest.
I'm cramming EA down your throat(Evidence of Artificiality)
You take the data wherever you find comfort with.

I will ask again:
Do the Squares share co-ordinates irregardless of Earth or Mars?
If so...Wich Co-ordinates?

Nevermind Skinner-he only scares YOU(he is a font of humour to me).
Click to expand...
first of all the sguare on the washington dc picture does not exist in reality
second, yes you can measure distances on mars in meters
 
Electric
Why don't you Verify a NASA site location for an undoctored image so a comparison can be made of your alleged artifact?
 
Electric_Ashalar said:
ylooshi.
Your problem(like SW's) is personality.
I'm not a member here to win a popularity contest.
I'm cramming EA down your throat(Evidence of Artificiality)
You take the data wherever you find comfort with.

I will ask again:
Do the Squares share co-ordinates irregardless of Earth or Mars?
If so...Wich Co-ordinates?

Nevermind Skinner-he only scares YOU(he is a font of humour to me).
Click to expand...
(This guy gets my vote for idiot of the month, folks. Another one for the ignore list. Sigh)
 
Electric,
Ty posting without attempting to start a flame war, then I might just stop deleting your posts.
 
Sure Stryder.
If I don"t? ya gonna ban me?
Do you honestly think I'd bullshit you.
I have EA.You don't.

Yep...ya got a live anomalist thrashin' around in here.

Yer gonna need a bigger boat.


Whaddaya need Stryder?
You think I just pull this outta thin air.
REOPEN my Thread,Please.Sir.
 
MyLittleStalkerFriend said:
Skinner...how economical with the Truth.
You act as if this is new to you...or NEWS to you
The Members of the Forum here see otherwise.
You've never read the Thread but you presume to convince us (having admitted purposeful ignorance)
that you are knowledgeable...and can hold your end of a debate up to scientific standards?

Kiss my ass.
You re lazy and you never measured nuthin' so shut ya mouth.
Blowharder.
Click to expand...

I appear to have struck a nerve with my simple questions and criticisms. I've read the thread. Indeed, I participated in it from day one before Stryder closed it. I even offered many images which effectively debunked your little claim that space aliens (or Martians or whomever) created monumental architecture on Mars.

As I recall, the little "square" on page one was your best "evidence." When looked at with any scrutiny, the "square" quickly disappears into the illusion of natural features. As I pointed out, the SW "side" doesn't even line up: the two ridges are not parallel. The other "sides" are likewise illusions and anyone with true critical thinking skills can see the problem with your spurious claims of "artificiality."

Your speculation is utter rubbish.

James R said:
01:15 AM
Insulting other posters will not be tolerated on sciforums. If you continue in the same vein as we have seen in your posts so far, you will be banned from sciforums.
Click to expand...
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1013473#post1013473

Electric_Ashalar said:
01:58 AM
Kiss my ass.
You re lazy and you never measured nuthin' so shut ya mouth.
Blowharder.
Click to expand...
 
I request my thread a ressurection.
Stryder You are personably responsible for this.
Sadly you won't own up to your inability to deal with power.
 
The Thread will stay closed because it was first started in 2003, and it died a death back then. The reason why I close the old threads when they get dragged up is purely because some people actually attempt to read threads post by post and reply at the end. When you drag up an old post they might reply to someone that posted here years ago that no longer posts here, or no longer has the same stance on what ever it was they posted.

As for banning you, I won't be doing that since thats not what I do, however I'm sure your abusive attitude will probably take you down that road eventually, if you should decide to keep it up.
 
Electric, As I keep attempting to say:

"Abuse doesn't win favour."
 
Electric_Ashalar said:
I request my thread a ressurection.
Click to expand...

But you haven't respectfully requested it. I think you should issue apologies to Stryder for you very rude and insolent remarks made about him publically. Then ask him to re-open your thread.
 
Leopold99
leopold99 said:
first of all the square on the washington dc picture does not exist in reality
second, yes you can measure distances on mars in meters
Actually the Square does exist in reality of washington D.C.

First of all as a blueprint.
then manifest as sattelite data.


But this doesn't matter,my thread here was closed.

So now I will re-new.

Without the Insults(You can call me a woo-woo though,I don;t mind that) I just don't care to be called a liar.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Im going to have to say that these two pictures are related only by the minds ability to do so. The pictures ARE similar, but one can hardly draw the conclusions that this thread is trying to do.
 
What is unnatural about a square?
They seem quite natural to me.

I can think of several features at microscopic and macroscopic scales that are perfectly natural. Why are we apparently (woo-woos and debunkers alike) implicitly or explicitly agreeing that a true square suggests something artificial?

Very strange.

By the way EA, natural squares are still square when we measure them in rods, chains, or perches. (Furlongs, feet, or angstrom units.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top