I would assume that you would consider claims about most any being offensive then.
Depends on the claim but generally speaking, that's silly. Why? I don't have to
believe those claims, or I can depending on plausibility, etc. Have you read flatland or do you at least get the gist? This gist of the story is the basis of my complaint. If you say you can picture a 5D something or other in your head I say you're full of shit. Same in relation to 'god'.
In other words if I claimed to notice you were pissed off even if you denied it and the like.
Well it might be annoying but surely I'd recover.
Also, arent you implicitly claiming knowledge about God.
Only the definition, omniscients, omnipotence, omnipresence, etc.
If there were a God no one could have knowledge about such a being or direct contact with such a being.
Based on simple analysis of the relation of the definition of the being to what appears to be reality to me. My comments are indirect.
I don't. Do you? I'm just talking shit that makes sense to me. I don't necessarily expect it to make sense to anyone else, but it's nice when it seems to happen. Knowledge is generally a matter of practicality I'd say. I know I exist, I know I have a wife, two kids, computer, cars, blah blah. Practically speaking, I'd never deny any of it. Philosophically speaking, it's a matter of my perception apparently meshing with theirs but with the twist that it's my perception doing the seeming.
How do you know God and/or humans are limited in the ways you seem to be sure they are?
I don't. Again, I'm speaking as to my perspective which is just as full of shit as anyone I suppose. I can tell you only how things seem to me.