maybe some moderator activity is required here.
Racism
- Thread starter prozak
- Start date
Am I the only person here that does not have a alternate name and personality on this forum? Am I the only one thats sane here??? 
i don't have one..WCfetus
that's two then
that's two then
Re: Looser
prozak! damn dog! is that really you? kinda jewish! are you then a self hating jew! why bother with creating a new acct? does prozak find these boards to constricting?
Originally posted by Prozakisafag
Here is a photo of Prozak with his friends...funny, they don't look very white to me...neither does Prozak really.
prozak! damn dog! is that really you? kinda jewish! are you then a self hating jew! why bother with creating a new acct? does prozak find these boards to constricting?
Racism isn't about hate, as you can see.
Well, now that you've forcibly asked.
Racism as I see it isn't about hate. Racism is one part of a political outlook that can be called nationalism. The racial part is not a question of superiority, but separation for the purposes of cultural survival with mutual respect.
Well, now that you've forcibly asked.
Racism as I see it isn't about hate. Racism is one part of a political outlook that can be called nationalism. The racial part is not a question of superiority, but separation for the purposes of cultural survival with mutual respect.
Racism as Dinosaur
Overall, the only benefit to nationalism that I can see is military strength. This is a medieval concept, though, and should have died out with the enlightenment, or at least with the development of modern warfare (which is not dependent on racial unity).
In the interest of avoiding a cliché, I'll forgo expounding on the obvious comparison with Hitler and focus more on the details of and motives for this racism.
- What is a race?
- What prevents one from maintaining cultural integrity when in the company of other cultures?
- Why must one maintain cultural integrity?
- Is there any justification for feeling that you are more entitled to live in your nation than those of other races are?
- Is mutual respect possible when your fundamental beliefs indicate that some freedoms (living in nation X) must be revoked from the other party?
Overall, the only benefit to nationalism that I can see is military strength. This is a medieval concept, though, and should have died out with the enlightenment, or at least with the development of modern warfare (which is not dependent on racial unity).
To the enlighten mind racism is a falsie, only the ignorant and egotistical cling to it!
No only the most foolish minds that think there enlightened. There is a big difference between nationalism and racism perhaps you should change the title of you belief before people get confused.
Believing in a game is ok though
I quote "aqua team hunger force" often
“Using a key to gouge expletives on another’s vehicle is a sign of trust… and friendship.”
Prophet Egnog: Aqua team Hunger force: Mooninites: 06:29-36
Believing in a game is ok though
I quote "aqua team hunger force" often
“Using a key to gouge expletives on another’s vehicle is a sign of trust… and friendship.”
Prophet Egnog: Aqua team Hunger force: Mooninites: 06:29-36
you mean ethnic and cultural differences?
aaaaaah ya what ever.
I Wouldn't Say So
Also, there are a large number of unanswered questions above, primarily directed towards your beliefs (in my last post).
Intelligent minds that are racist are usually intelligent in spite of their racism, not because of it, and intelligence is not the cause of their racism. Such minds, however, are few and far between. Show me an intelligent racist, and I'll show you an unforgiving societal meme.Originally posted by prozak
Not necessarily. The most enlightened minds are usually racist
Also, there are a large number of unanswered questions above, primarily directed towards your beliefs (in my last post).
With just a little reading, you can answer all your own questions about the basis for racism, its degree of usefuleness in the past, and its degree of usefulness now: http://www.google.com.au/search?q=Hamilton's+Rule&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&meta=
Re: I Wouldn't Say So
What about the other possibility: that intelligent minds produce many intelligent outputs, of which a "Racist" (nationalist) belief might be one?
Arthur Schopenhauer is one intelligent racist. Thomas Jefferson is another. Any from the current time are keeping quiet about it, because racism is a big taboo.
You might find the answers you seek here:
http://www.anus.com/anus/ideology/
But since you've already stated yourself as a bigoted foe of "racism," I'm not going into depth again here.
What about the other possibility: that intelligent minds produce many intelligent outputs, of which a "Racist" (nationalist) belief might be one?
Arthur Schopenhauer is one intelligent racist. Thomas Jefferson is another. Any from the current time are keeping quiet about it, because racism is a big taboo.
You might find the answers you seek here:
http://www.anus.com/anus/ideology/
But since you've already stated yourself as a bigoted foe of "racism," I'm not going into depth again here.