BTW, not that you were going to invest a ton of time on an equation that simply extends my equation from two converging quanta to multiple converging quanta, the equation won't mean anything if the idea is nonsense.
It seems that the force would be electromagnetism at its finest
. The energy boost given the electron must be "work" produced by the absorption event. I find it interesting that an electron can absorb enough energy to break free from the proton as the energy density in the environment increases, say as the current increases or some acceleration of the atoms or molecules occurs, as in the LHC, where the protons are stripped of electrons very early in their acceleration. They get the protons up to velocities within a few percent or is it a fraction of a percent of the speed of light?
If you remember the above post showing the convergence of two quantum waves, taking place within the standing wave pattern of a particle, you might be able to picture the scene where multiple quantum waves are intersecting at the same time within a greater standing wave pattern, as we considerd more and more quanta within a given particle. It might begin to look like this:In the diagram in the OP above, the new quantum wave will be centered relative to the two parent waves. But according to the Gravity Hypothesis, motion of an object is caused by an imbalance in the net inflowing wave energy. Since the inflow in the example in the OP is made up of two equally dense parent waves, there is no motion resulting from the convergence; the new quantum wave is located in the center of the action.
However, consider the convergence below:
Notice the imbalance between the two parent quantum waves. The smaller parent wave, Sphere B, has higher energy density because its quantum of energy is confined in a smaller sphere. The location of the new quantum wave produced by Cap A and Cap B will be offset in the direction of Sphere B because of the directional imbalace of the inflowing wave energy density. The new quantum wave will expand spherically from the Cap A + Cap B lens shaped space.
This is a simple example, but the principle of motion in the direction of the highest inflowing wave energy density is depicted.
A particle in my so called model will be much more complex in that there will be a huge number of converging quantum waves in the standing wave pattern, and the directional inflow will be arriving at the particle from the spherical out flow of other particles and objects.
(43)
If you remember the above post showing the convergence of two quantum waves, taking place within the standing wave pattern of a particle, you might be able to picture the scene where multiple quantum waves are intersecting at the same time within a greater standing wave pattern, as we considerd more and more quanta within a given particle. It might begin to look like this:
(758)
I half feared starting a Kenny Everett/Captain Kremmen craze, but it has to be said it was brilliant humor rarely if ever seen nowadays. Evidently our very own CK was not amused - there being no feedback. Tch tch.
Anyway, not recommended for education on the real cosmos!
I half feared starting a Kenny Everett/Captain Kremmen craze, but it has to be said it was brilliant humor rarely if ever seen nowadays. Evidently our very own CK was not amused - there being no feedback. Tch tch.
It seems that the force would be electromagnetism at its finest
Yes, in terms of my so called model, the electron is a standing wave pattern with hundreds of thousands of quanta, as in my wild a** guess above (post #63). As the energy of a particle changes, the number of quanta in the particle changes.
If you got the phrase "quantum unit" from post #63 above, then that post gives the so called logic behind the calculation, i.e. the energy of the electron vs the proton. The electron has 1/1836 the energy of the proton under certain conditions according to some popular science media. The other piece is the unsupported idea that the electron has one quanta for every quanta on the surface of a proton. Put those two ideas together and you can then follow the calculations.
Length, and in the exercise the length is the average diameter of the quanta that make up the particles. The so called principle I used was that each quanta starts out in size as the point of intersection between quantum waves in the standing wave pattern, and expands within the particle space until that expansion is interrupted, at which point they intersect with other expanding quanta. If there are hundreds of thousands of quanta, they range in size, but the concept of an average quanta in a particle can be established. The length of the diameter of an average spherical quanta is the quantum unit of length.
The equation in the OP is written to work with any two expanding spherical waves, whether at the quantum level as in the standing wave pattern of a particle, or at the macro level as when two parent big bang arenas converge and overlap to produce a new big bang.I'm a layman science enthusiast and am producing volumes of word salad on my "Gravity's Mechanism" thread that almost no one reads and no one agrees with, so there is nothing remarkable about that. But as part of that, my ideas need to be quantified in order to be more descriptive.
My view is that waves traverse space carrying energy so I simply refer to them as energy waves, though I envision space as a foundational medium that carrys them. The foundational waves are not the electromagnetic waves emitted by electrons, the foundational waves are the waves that electrons, and all particles are composed of. In my so called model, particles are composed of standing waves that have inflowing and out flowing wave energy components. It is the imbalance between the directional inflowing wave energy and the spherically out flowing wave energy that I predict causes gravity's mechanism.
Image of two converging spherical waves forming a high density spot in the overlap space
If you can picture two spherical waves expanding into each other, the point where they first touch is the "point of convergence", and as they continue to expand, they overlap. Geometrically, the shape of the overlap is referred to as a lens shaped space, and in my hypothesis, the overlap space represents the high density spot generated by the converging waves. These high density spots, though fleeting in duration, make up for that by being numerous within the particle's standing wave pattern.
I call the waves that maintain the presence of the standing wave particles *quantum waves. I refer to the two converging waves as "parent" quantum waves, and the new high density spot in the lens expands out of the convergence spherically when it reaches a quantum itself; a process I call quantum action.
$$\frac{V_{capR}}{V_R}+\frac{V_{capr}}{V_r}+\frac{V_{capR}}{V_r}+\frac{V_{capr}}{V_R}=$$$$\frac{1/3\pi H^2(3R-H)}{4/3\pi R^3}+\frac{1/3\pi h^2(3r-h)}{4/3\pi r^3}+\frac{1/3\pi H ^2(3R-H)}{4/3\pi r^3}+\frac{1/3\pi h^2(3r-h)}{4/3\pi R^3}$$
The new quantum wave consists of Cap R and Cap r in the diagram. The equation represents the process. Each parent wave is 1 quantum, and when the equation equals 1, the new quantum wave has been generated.
If I can respond based on by so called model, that is true, but it is also true that a photon always has the same energy in vacuum because it gets all of its inflowing wave energy component from the direction of motion. If you understand my so called model you know that motion is determined by the imbalance in the directionally inflowing wave energy, so in the case of the photon, its motion is in a straight line as long as the directionally inflowing wave energy density is constant in the direction that the photon is radiated.
True, but the partilces in my model have internal composition unlike the fundamental particles of the Standard Model; they are composed of quanta in standing wave patterns with inflowing and out flowing wave energy components sustaining their presence, so when you talk about shells, that theoretical construct is still useful for quantification, but does not correspond directly to the quantum action depiced in my so called model.