Other than the spelling, one is a scientific study (Physics), the other is bunkum (Psychic's), however the psychic's already knew that... after all their psychicwhat's the difference between psychics and physics?
Other than the spelling, one is a scientific study (Physics), the other is bunkum (Psychic's), however the psychic's already knew that... after all their psychicwhat's the difference between psychics and physics?
dont know if anyone posted this pr not but ive been working on a theory for pyrokinesis
although any theory on any enhanced ability in humans would involve the assumption of elevated brain waves
but here goes if the body could be used as some sort of capacitor for energy being able to absorb and emmit said energy at will then one could initially set fire to something with only a touch or wave of the hand
although i dont thin this would ever be possible on a large scale let alone at all but hey, a girl can dream right?
I think there is a practical explanation for these "psychic powers", but as of now nobody has been able to demonstrate psychic ability definitively to scientists.
I think with biotech in the future
, we might be able to communicate telepathically.
Thought is a medium. They'd be sent by brain waves right?Again considering the Evolution of creatures across the planets surface there is no evidence to support "Telepathy" in a naturally evolved state. All creatures that communicate with one another do so via some form of medium, be it sound, movement or pheromones.
It doesn't neglect the medium; it provides one, which is brain waves."Telepathy" always seems to suggest the ability a person could transmit thought to another person but tends to neglect the Medium. Without a medium it can not exist. (Medium in definition)
I agreeThis is the reason I believe that the only "Telepathy" that can ever be developed is "Artificial Telepathy" which requires Non-organic components (Like Computers and Radio antenna arrays) This would potentially allow a persons thoughts to be Calculated through the use of measuring equipment and inserted at a defined target through similar equipment.
No they don't.they do exist
So why haven't they (been proven)?and can very well be proven
Maybe you should learn some physics if that's what you think.they are natural laws of physcis