Prove that I am not God

Yazata said:
If there is only one capital-G God, and if I am that God, then you can't be.
Click to expand...
That would be a logical conclusion. But no one claims there is only one God. There is Jesus, who is both human and God (the son of God, begotten by immaculate conception)

Even monotheistic religions don't claim the impossibility of lesser gods. We have angels, demons, cherubs, dragons, spirits, you name it and it exists in the world of gods. The world of mythology.
Most Relevant Verses,
Revelation 16:13-14;
And I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of the beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits like frogs; for they are spirits of demons, performing signs, which go out to the kings of the whole world, to gather them together for the war of the great day of God, the Almighty.
Click to expand...
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Demons,-Evil-Work-Of
 
DaveC426913 said:
Correct. Not "prove", just not "granted".

I dreamed of a fnord last night. It does not objectively exist (i.e. no one has any reason to grant it exists) until/unless I can demonstrate it.
Click to expand...

Exactly.


No. Objective people (who are rational) won't generally accept the existence of something objective unless there's reason to.
Click to expand...

Agreed.

They can't. There are an infinite number of things one could suppose exist (Santa, unicorns, fnords, greeblies, fizbins) but are not objective unless the supposer can make a case for them.
Click to expand...

Almost, but you don't need to make a case for anything to exist, unless you choose to believe.

The alternative is that you must grant that fnords objectively exist simply because I say they do.
Click to expand...

That's called Hitler.

In my discussion about fnords, I'm about to assert that they are the cause of tooth decay and will expound upon their nature.
I can't expect you to discuss their nature, unless I first convince you they exist. And there's no reason you should.
Click to expand...

Correct.
 
Capracus said:
Moderator note: this thread was originally split from the following thread:
According to your standards, the possibility of those qualities are justifiably as likely in myself as they are in any example you can offer for them existing anywhere else.

I am your omnimax god, and you have no way of proving that I’m not.
Click to expand...
And YOU have no way of proving that youre,,
which makes you irrelevant

Check m8
 
Capracus said: ↑
Regardless of what reality you perceive, your innate limitations preclude your ability to discern the actual identity of any god.
/QUOTE

HAHAHA
Youre quite an Ignoramus for an Omniscient one

www.godchecker.com
 
Capracus said:
Since you’re apparently not convinced of my divinity, what would it take for me or any other entity to justify the claim?
Click to expand...
For the record, if you appeared as a 100 mile tall bearded man with a staff, and turned day into night with the snap of your fingers and turned the world inside out without uprooting me from my chair, I would probably concede that 'You are indeed God' would rise to near the top of my list of theories.

Right up there with Clarke's Third Law.
 
DaveC426913 said:
For the record, if you appeared as a 100 mile tall bearded man with a staff, and turned day into night with the snap of your fingers and turned the world inside out without uprooting me from my chair, I would probably concede that 'You are indeed God' would rise to near the top of my list of theories.

Right up there with Clarke's Third Law.
Click to expand...
After experiencing such an exhibition of magic, I would have to remind myself of the human capacity to judge by citing Harry’s First Law.

 
Capracus said:
Of course I would, but I would also have the perogative of having you explain it to everyone else.
Click to expand...
But you would also know wether he will be compliant or not

Is this one of the mysterious ways you move?

:)
 
scorpius said:
Bit dense arent you,kiddo
Wouldnt an ALL Knowing mutha KNOW what would it take to convince me?
Click to expand...
You're kind of missing the point here.
Capracus-God has given you free will to see what you will do with it.
Even though he knows all, he is testing you - to see if you will say what will convince you.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Yes. But as Capracus points out, it's not for His benefit; it's for everyone else's benefit.
Click to expand...
Which he already knows they will or will not get

But I guess mysterious ways will do what mysterious ways will do

Love to see god drive Elon Musk car back to Earth

Settled, he exist

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
Which he already knows they will or will not get
Click to expand...
The purpose is not for Capracus to see what he does; the purpose is for all the rest of his subjects to hear scorpius express his views so they hear one of their own talking about being convinced.

The labcoat knows the rat will find the cheese; the labcoat is getting the rat to show the other rats where the cheese is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top